Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurocritical Care 1/2022

04-03-2022 | Central Nervous System Trauma | Original work

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit for Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Analysis of the CENTER-TBI China Registry

Authors: Chun Yang, Yuxiao Ma, Li Xie, Xiang Wu, Jiyuan Hui, Jiyao Jiang, Guoyi Gao, Junfeng Feng

Published in: Neurocritical Care | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although the current guidelines recommend the use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), the evidence indicating benefit is limited. The present study aims to evaluate the impact of ICP monitoring on patients with sTBI in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

The patient data were obtained from the Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury China Registry, a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal, observational, cohort study. Patients with sTBI who were admitted to 52 ICUs across China, managed with ICP monitoring or without, were analyzed in this study. Patients with missing information on discharge survival status, Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission to hospital, and record of ICP monitoring application were excluded from the analysis. Data on demographic characteristics, injury, clinical features, treatments, survival at discharge, discharge destination, and length of stay were collected and assessed. The primary end point was survival state at discharge, and death from any cause was considered the event of interest.

Results

A total of 2029 patients with sTBI were admitted to the ICU; 737 patients (36.32%) underwent ICP monitoring, and 1292 (63.68%) were managed without ICP monitoring. There was a difference between management with and without ICP monitoring on in-hospital mortality in the unmatched cohort (18.86% vs. 26.63%, p < 0.001) and the propensity-score-matched cohort (19.82% vs. 26.83%, p = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regressions also indicated that increasing age, higher injury severity score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, unilateral and bilateral pupillary abnormalities, systemic hypotension (SBP ≤ 90 mm Hg), hypoxia (SpO2 < 95%) on arrival at the hospital, and management without ICP monitoring were associated with higher in-hospital mortality. However, the patients without ICP monitoring had a lower length of stay in the ICU (11.79 vs. 7.95 days, p < 0.001) and hospital (25.96 vs. 21.71 days, p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of survivors were discharged to the home with better recovery in self-care.

Conclusions

Although ICP monitoring was not widely used by all of the centers participating in this study, patients with sTBI managed with ICP monitoring show a better outcome in overall survival. Nevertheless, the use of ICP monitoring makes the management of sTBI more complex and increases the costs of medical care by prolonging the patient’s stay in the ICU or hospital.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al. Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intens Care Med 2014;40(9):1189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3369-6. Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al. Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intens Care Med 2014;40(9):1189–209. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00134-014-3369-6.
8.
go back to reference Brain Trauma F, American Association of Neurological S, Congress of Neurological S, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 2007;24 Suppl 1:S37–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2007.9990. Brain Trauma F, American Association of Neurological S, Congress of Neurological S, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 2007;24 Suppl 1:S37–44. DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1089/​neu.​2007.​9990.
13.
go back to reference Lane PL, Skoretz TG, Doig G, Girotti MJ. Intracranial pressure monitoring and outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Can J Surg. 2000;43(6):442–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Lane PL, Skoretz TG, Doig G, Girotti MJ. Intracranial pressure monitoring and outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Can J Surg. 2000;43(6):442–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Alali AS, Fowler RA, Mainprize TG, et al. Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: results from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Journal of neurotrauma 2013;30(20):1737–46. (In eng). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2012.2802. Alali AS, Fowler RA, Mainprize TG, et al. Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: results from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Journal of neurotrauma 2013;30(20):1737–46. (In eng). DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1089/​neu.​2012.​2802.
38.
go back to reference Zeiler FA, Donnelly J, Smielewski P, Menon DK, Hutchinson PJ, Czosnyka M. Critical thresholds of intracranial pressure-derived continuous cerebrovascular reactivity indices for outcome prediction in noncraniectomized patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(10):1107–15. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5472.CrossRefPubMed Zeiler FA, Donnelly J, Smielewski P, Menon DK, Hutchinson PJ, Czosnyka M. Critical thresholds of intracranial pressure-derived continuous cerebrovascular reactivity indices for outcome prediction in noncraniectomized patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(10):1107–15. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1089/​neu.​2017.​5472.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Cnossen MC, Huijben JA, van der Jagt M, et al. Variation in monitoring and treatment policies for intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study. Critical Care (London, England) 2017;21(1):233. (In eng). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1816-9. Cnossen MC, Huijben JA, van der Jagt M, et al. Variation in monitoring and treatment policies for intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study. Critical Care (London, England) 2017;21(1):233. (In eng). DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13054-017-1816-9.
50.
go back to reference Kostic A, Stefanovic I, Novak V, Veselinovic D, Ivanov G, Veselinovic A. Prognostic significance of intracranial pressure monitoring and intracranial hypertension in severe brain trauma patients. Med Pregl. 2011;64(9–10):461–5.CrossRefPubMed Kostic A, Stefanovic I, Novak V, Veselinovic D, Ivanov G, Veselinovic A. Prognostic significance of intracranial pressure monitoring and intracranial hypertension in severe brain trauma patients. Med Pregl. 2011;64(9–10):461–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit for Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Analysis of the CENTER-TBI China Registry
Authors
Chun Yang
Yuxiao Ma
Li Xie
Xiang Wu
Jiyuan Hui
Jiyao Jiang
Guoyi Gao
Junfeng Feng
Publication date
04-03-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Neurocritical Care / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1541-6933
Electronic ISSN: 1556-0961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01463-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Neurocritical Care 1/2022 Go to the issue