Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 10/2022

01-04-2022 | Peritoneal Dialysis | Nephrology - Original Paper

Effects of a remote patient monitoring system for patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: a randomized crossover controlled trial

Authors: Kiyotaka Uchiyama, Kohkichi Morimoto, Naoki Washida, Ei Kusahana, Takashin Nakayama, Tomoaki Itoh, Takahiro Kasai, Shu Wakino, Hiroshi Itoh

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 10/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has contributed to improved patient-centered outcomes and prognosis in patients with end-stage renal disease on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). However, evidence from prospective trials is lacking.

Methods

The participants (n = 15; median age: 65 years; males: 10; peritoneal dialysis vintage: 6.4 ± 3.5 years) randomly received APD therapy using the Kaguya® APD system either with or without the connective use of the cloud-based RPM software Sharesource® for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction assessed using a modified nine-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were healthcare resource consumption, the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) subscales assessed with the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form questionnaire, and clinical laboratory parameters.

Results

Significant improvements were observed in the TSQM-9 subscales of Effectiveness (64.4 ± 18.8 vs. 57.8 ± 18.8; P = 0.006) and Convenience (76.3 ± 15.4 vs. 63.3 ± 17.3; P < 0.001) in patients on Sharesource®. Moreover, Sharesource® reduced the total amount of healthcare resource consumption (0.80 ± 1.32 vs. 1.87 ± 2.39 times/12 weeks; P = 0.02) and consultation time during regular monthly visits (813 ± 269 vs. 1024 ± 292 s; P < 0.001). A significant increase in ultrafiltration volume was found associated with more frequent modification of APD prescription in patients with Sharesource®. Sharesource® also improved the HRQOL subscale of General Health and Vitality.

Conclusion

Sharesource® can improve patient-centered outcomes in patients on APD while reducing the treatment burden for both patients and medical staff.
Trial registration: The study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT Number: jRCTs032190005).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nitta K, Masakane I, Hanafusa N, et al (2020) 2019 Annual Dialysis Data Report, JSDT Renal Data Registry. J Jpn Soc Dial Ther 53:579–632. (Japanese) Nitta K, Masakane I, Hanafusa N, et al (2020) 2019 Annual Dialysis Data Report, JSDT Renal Data Registry. J Jpn Soc Dial Ther 53:579–632. (Japanese)
2.
go back to reference Li PK, Chow KM, Van de Luijtgaarden MW et al (2017) Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol 13:90–103CrossRef Li PK, Chow KM, Van de Luijtgaarden MW et al (2017) Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol 13:90–103CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rabindranath KS, Adams J, Ali TZ et al (2007) Automated vs continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:2991–2998CrossRef Rabindranath KS, Adams J, Ali TZ et al (2007) Automated vs continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:2991–2998CrossRef
4.
go back to reference De Wit GA, Merkus MP, Krediet RT et al (2001) A comparison of quality of life of patients on automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 21:306–312CrossRef De Wit GA, Merkus MP, Krediet RT et al (2001) A comparison of quality of life of patients on automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 21:306–312CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ariza JG, Walton SM, Sanabria M et al (2020) Evaluating a remote patient monitoring program for automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 40:377–383CrossRef Ariza JG, Walton SM, Sanabria M et al (2020) Evaluating a remote patient monitoring program for automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 40:377–383CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Milan Manani S, Rosner MH, Virzì GM et al (2019) Longitudinal experience with remote monitoring for automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephron 142:1–9CrossRef Milan Manani S, Rosner MH, Virzì GM et al (2019) Longitudinal experience with remote monitoring for automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephron 142:1–9CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sanabria M, Buitrago G, Lindholm B et al (2019) Remote patient monitoring program in automated peritoneal dialysis: impact on hospitalizations. Perit Dial Int 39:472–478CrossRef Sanabria M, Buitrago G, Lindholm B et al (2019) Remote patient monitoring program in automated peritoneal dialysis: impact on hospitalizations. Perit Dial Int 39:472–478CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yeter HH, Akcay OF, Ronco C et al (2020) Automated remote monitoring for peritoneal dialysis and its impact on blood pressure. Cardiorenal Med 10:198–208CrossRef Yeter HH, Akcay OF, Ronco C et al (2020) Automated remote monitoring for peritoneal dialysis and its impact on blood pressure. Cardiorenal Med 10:198–208CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Uchiyama K, Washida N, Yube N et al (2018) The impact of a remote monitoring system of healthcare resource consumption in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD): a simulation study. Clin Nephrol 90:334–340CrossRef Uchiyama K, Washida N, Yube N et al (2018) The impact of a remote monitoring system of healthcare resource consumption in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD): a simulation study. Clin Nephrol 90:334–340CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Makhija D, Alscher MD, Becker S et al (2018) Remote monitoring of automated peritoneal dialysis patients: assessing clinical and economic value. Telemed J E Health 24:315–323CrossRef Makhija D, Alscher MD, Becker S et al (2018) Remote monitoring of automated peritoneal dialysis patients: assessing clinical and economic value. Telemed J E Health 24:315–323CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Milan Manani S, Crepaldi C, Giuliani A et al (2018) Remote monitoring of automated peritoneal dialysis improves personalization of dialytic prescription and patient’s independence. Blood Purif 46:111–117CrossRef Milan Manani S, Crepaldi C, Giuliani A et al (2018) Remote monitoring of automated peritoneal dialysis improves personalization of dialytic prescription and patient’s independence. Blood Purif 46:111–117CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass SL et al (2004) Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:12CrossRef Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass SL et al (2004) Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:12CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bharmal M, Payne K, Atkinson MJ et al (2009) Validation of an abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) among patients on antihypertensive medications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:36CrossRef Bharmal M, Payne K, Atkinson MJ et al (2009) Validation of an abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) among patients on antihypertensive medications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:36CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Green J, Fukuhara S, Shinzato T et al (2001) Translation, cultural adaptation, and initial reliability and multitrait testing of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life instrument for use in Japan. Qual Life Res 10:93–100CrossRef Green J, Fukuhara S, Shinzato T et al (2001) Translation, cultural adaptation, and initial reliability and multitrait testing of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life instrument for use in Japan. Qual Life Res 10:93–100CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Suzukamo Y, Fukuhara S, Green J et al (2011) Validation testing of a three-component model of Short Form-36 scores. J Clin Epidemiol 64:301–308CrossRef Suzukamo Y, Fukuhara S, Green J et al (2011) Validation testing of a three-component model of Short Form-36 scores. J Clin Epidemiol 64:301–308CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Uchiyama K, Washida N, Morimoto K et al (2019) Home-based aerobic exercise and resistance training in peritoneal dialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep 9:2632CrossRef Uchiyama K, Washida N, Morimoto K et al (2019) Home-based aerobic exercise and resistance training in peritoneal dialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep 9:2632CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Grizzle JE (1965) The two-period change-over design and its use in clinical trials. Biometrics 21:467–480CrossRef Grizzle JE (1965) The two-period change-over design and its use in clinical trials. Biometrics 21:467–480CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Grieve AP (1982) The two-period changeover design in clinical trials. Biometrics 38:517PubMed Grieve AP (1982) The two-period changeover design in clinical trials. Biometrics 38:517PubMed
20.
go back to reference Contoli M, Rogliani P, Di Marco F et al (2019) Satisfaction with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment: results from a multicenter, observational study. Ther Adv Respir Dis 13:1753466619888128CrossRef Contoli M, Rogliani P, Di Marco F et al (2019) Satisfaction with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment: results from a multicenter, observational study. Ther Adv Respir Dis 13:1753466619888128CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bovée DM, Visser WJ, Middel I et al (2020) A randomized trial of distal diuretics versus dietary sodium restriction for hypertension in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 31:650–662CrossRef Bovée DM, Visser WJ, Middel I et al (2020) A randomized trial of distal diuretics versus dietary sodium restriction for hypertension in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 31:650–662CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bunch A, Vesga JI, Camargo DO et al (2019) Remote automated peritoneal dialysis management in Colombia. Kidney Int Rep 4:873–876CrossRef Bunch A, Vesga JI, Camargo DO et al (2019) Remote automated peritoneal dialysis management in Colombia. Kidney Int Rep 4:873–876CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brunkhorst R, Wrenger E, Krautzig S et al (1994) Clinical experience with home automated peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int Suppl 48:S25–S30PubMed Brunkhorst R, Wrenger E, Krautzig S et al (1994) Clinical experience with home automated peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int Suppl 48:S25–S30PubMed
24.
go back to reference Schaefer F, Klaus G, Müller-Wiefel DE et al (1999) Current practice of peritoneal dialysis in children: results of a longitudinal survey. Mid European Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group (MEPPS). Perit Dial Int 19:S445–S449CrossRef Schaefer F, Klaus G, Müller-Wiefel DE et al (1999) Current practice of peritoneal dialysis in children: results of a longitudinal survey. Mid European Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group (MEPPS). Perit Dial Int 19:S445–S449CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bro S, Bjorner JB, Tofte-Jensen P et al (1999) A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment. Perit Dial Int 19:526–533CrossRef Bro S, Bjorner JB, Tofte-Jensen P et al (1999) A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment. Perit Dial Int 19:526–533CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sanchez AR, Madonia C, Rascon-Pacheco RA (2008) Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a Mexican PD center. Kidney Int Suppl 108:S76–S80CrossRef Sanchez AR, Madonia C, Rascon-Pacheco RA (2008) Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a Mexican PD center. Kidney Int Suppl 108:S76–S80CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B et al (2016) ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int 36:481–508CrossRef Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B et al (2016) ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int 36:481–508CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Martínez García MA, Fernández Rosales MS, López Domínguez E et al (2018) Telemonitoring system for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis: usability assessment based on a case study. PLoS One 13:e0206600CrossRef Martínez García MA, Fernández Rosales MS, López Domínguez E et al (2018) Telemonitoring system for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis: usability assessment based on a case study. PLoS One 13:e0206600CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Magnus M, Sikka N, Cherian T et al (2017) Satisfaction and improvements in peritoneal dialysis outcomes associated with telehealth. Appl Clin Inform 8:214–225PubMedPubMedCentral Magnus M, Sikka N, Cherian T et al (2017) Satisfaction and improvements in peritoneal dialysis outcomes associated with telehealth. Appl Clin Inform 8:214–225PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K et al (2020) Patients’ and caregivers’ expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for peritoneal dialysis: a qualitative interview study. Perit Dial Int 40:540–547CrossRef Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K et al (2020) Patients’ and caregivers’ expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for peritoneal dialysis: a qualitative interview study. Perit Dial Int 40:540–547CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K et al (2020) Clinicians’ experiences with remote patient monitoring in peritoneal dialysis: a semi-structured interview study. Perit Dial Int 40:202–208CrossRef Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K et al (2020) Clinicians’ experiences with remote patient monitoring in peritoneal dialysis: a semi-structured interview study. Perit Dial Int 40:202–208CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Drepper VJ, Martin PY, Chopard CS et al (2018) Remote patient management in automated peritoneal dialysis: a promising new tool. Perit Dial Int 38:76–78CrossRef Drepper VJ, Martin PY, Chopard CS et al (2018) Remote patient management in automated peritoneal dialysis: a promising new tool. Perit Dial Int 38:76–78CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bernardini J, Nagy M, Piraino B (2000) Pattern of noncompliance with dialysis exchanges in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 35:1104–1110CrossRef Bernardini J, Nagy M, Piraino B (2000) Pattern of noncompliance with dialysis exchanges in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 35:1104–1110CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Giuliani A, Crepaldi C, Milan Manani S et al (2019) Evolution of automated peritoneal dialysis machines. Contrib Nephrol 197:9–16CrossRef Giuliani A, Crepaldi C, Milan Manani S et al (2019) Evolution of automated peritoneal dialysis machines. Contrib Nephrol 197:9–16CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wallace EL, Rosner MH, Alscher MD et al (2017) Remote patient management for home dialysis patients. Kidney Int Rep 2:1009–1017CrossRef Wallace EL, Rosner MH, Alscher MD et al (2017) Remote patient management for home dialysis patients. Kidney Int Rep 2:1009–1017CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of a remote patient monitoring system for patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: a randomized crossover controlled trial
Authors
Kiyotaka Uchiyama
Kohkichi Morimoto
Naoki Washida
Ei Kusahana
Takashin Nakayama
Tomoaki Itoh
Takahiro Kasai
Shu Wakino
Hiroshi Itoh
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03178-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2022

International Urology and Nephrology 10/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.