Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2019

Open Access 01-06-2019

What Employer Actions Are Considered Most Important for the Return to Work of Employees with Cancer? A Delphi Study Among Employees and Employers

Authors: M. A. Greidanus, S. J. Tamminga, A. E. de Rijk, M. H. W. Frings-Dresen, A. G. E. M. de Boer

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose Employers are important stakeholders in the return to work (RTW) of employees with cancer. However, it is unclear what employer actions are most important to that process. The objective, therefore, was to reach consensus on what employer actions are considered most important for the RTW of employees with cancer, by employers and employees separately. Methods A two-round online Delphi study was conducted with two expert panels: one with 23 employers and one with 29 employees with cancer. The results from each panel were analysed separately. Out of 24 suggested employer actions, participants selected the 10 they considered most important for RTW in each of the following RTW phases: (1) disclosure, (2) treatment, (3) RTW plan, and (4) actual RTW. The consensus threshold was set at ≥ 80% during the second round. Results The employer and employee expert panels both reached consensus on the importance of ‘emotional support’, ‘practical support’, ‘allow sufficient sick leave’, ‘plan return to work’, ‘adjust expectations’, ‘assess work ability’, and ‘show appreciation’. Employers also reached consensus on ‘communicate’ and ‘treat normally’, and employees on ‘handle unpredictability’. All these employer actions were considered to be specific for one to three RTW phases. Conclusions Employers reached consensus on the importance of nine employer actions, employees on eight. Both stakeholder perspectives showed great similarities, but did vary regarding important employer actions during the employee’s treatment. We recommend developing interventions targeting the employer, meeting both employer and employee needs in each RTW phase, to enhance RTW support for employees with cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–E386.CrossRef Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–E386.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bray F, Soerjomataram I. The changing global burden of cancer: transitions in human development and implications for cancer prevention and control. In: Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R, Horton S, editors. Cancer: disease control priorities, 3rd ed. (vol 3). Washington (DC): World Bank; 2015 Bray F, Soerjomataram I. The changing global burden of cancer: transitions in human development and implications for cancer prevention and control. In: Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R, Horton S, editors. Cancer: disease control priorities, 3rd ed. (vol 3). Washington (DC): World Bank; 2015
3.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–1403.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–1403.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Hebert D, Phan S, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):657–670.CrossRefPubMed Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Hebert D, Phan S, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):657–670.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Duijts SF, van Egmond MP, Spelten E, van Muijen P, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Physical and psychosocial problems in cancer survivors beyond return to work: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2014;23(5):481–492.CrossRefPubMed Duijts SF, van Egmond MP, Spelten E, van Muijen P, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Physical and psychosocial problems in cancer survivors beyond return to work: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2014;23(5):481–492.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Steiner JF, Nowels CT, Main DS. Returning to work after cancer: quantitative studies and prototypical narratives. Psychooncology. 2010;19(2):115–124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Steiner JF, Nowels CT, Main DS. Returning to work after cancer: quantitative studies and prototypical narratives. Psychooncology. 2010;19(2):115–124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Cheung K, Ching SYS, Chan A, Cheung D, Cheung SYP. The impact of personal-, disease- and work-related factors on work ability of women with breast cancer living in the community: a cross-sectional survey study. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(11):3495–3504.CrossRefPubMed Cheung K, Ching SYS, Chan A, Cheung D, Cheung SYP. The impact of personal-, disease- and work-related factors on work ability of women with breast cancer living in the community: a cross-sectional survey study. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(11):3495–3504.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(Suppl 11):2151–2159.CrossRefPubMed Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(Suppl 11):2151–2159.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Nilsson M, Olsson M, Wennman-Larsen A, Petersson LM, Alexanderson K. Return to work after breast cancer: women’s experiences of encounters with different stakeholders. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(3):267–274.CrossRefPubMed Nilsson M, Olsson M, Wennman-Larsen A, Petersson LM, Alexanderson K. Return to work after breast cancer: women’s experiences of encounters with different stakeholders. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(3):267–274.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tiedtke C, Donceel P, Knops L, Desiron H, Dierckx de Casterle B, de Rijk A. Supporting return-to-work in the face of legislation: stakeholders’ experiences with return-to-work after breast cancer in Belgium. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(2):241–251.CrossRefPubMed Tiedtke C, Donceel P, Knops L, Desiron H, Dierckx de Casterle B, de Rijk A. Supporting return-to-work in the face of legislation: stakeholders’ experiences with return-to-work after breast cancer in Belgium. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(2):241–251.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, Anema JR, van Poppel MN. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):543–556.CrossRefPubMed Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, Anema JR, van Poppel MN. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):543–556.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Islam T, Dahlui M, Majid HA, Nahar AM, Mohd Taib NA, Su TT, et al. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(Suppl 3):S8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Islam T, Dahlui M, Majid HA, Nahar AM, Mohd Taib NA, Su TT, et al. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(Suppl 3):S8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Greidanus MA, de Boer A, de Rijk AE, Tiedtke CM, Dierckx de Casterle B, Frings-Dresen MHW, et al. Perceived employer-related barriers and facilitators for work participation of cancer survivors: a systematic review of employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. Psychooncology. 2018;27(3):725–733.CrossRefPubMed Greidanus MA, de Boer A, de Rijk AE, Tiedtke CM, Dierckx de Casterle B, Frings-Dresen MHW, et al. Perceived employer-related barriers and facilitators for work participation of cancer survivors: a systematic review of employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. Psychooncology. 2018;27(3):725–733.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tiedtke CM, Dierckx de Casterle B, Frings-Dresen MHW, De Boer A, Greidanus MA, Tamminga SJ, et al. Employers’ experience of employees with cancer: trajectories of complex communication. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11(5):562–577.CrossRef Tiedtke CM, Dierckx de Casterle B, Frings-Dresen MHW, De Boer A, Greidanus MA, Tamminga SJ, et al. Employers’ experience of employees with cancer: trajectories of complex communication. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11(5):562–577.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Caron M, Durand MJ, Tremblay D. Perceptions of breast cancer survivors on the supporting practices of their supervisors in the return-to-work process: a qualitative descriptive study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):89–96.CrossRefPubMed Caron M, Durand MJ, Tremblay D. Perceptions of breast cancer survivors on the supporting practices of their supervisors in the return-to-work process: a qualitative descriptive study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):89–96.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference von der Gracht HA. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2012;79(8):1525–1536.CrossRef von der Gracht HA. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2012;79(8):1525–1536.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference de Jong M, Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Frings-Dresen MH. Quality of working life of cancer survivors: development of a cancer-specific questionnaire. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(2):394–405.CrossRefPubMed de Jong M, Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Frings-Dresen MH. Quality of working life of cancer survivors: development of a cancer-specific questionnaire. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(2):394–405.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference de Jong M, Tamminga SJ, Frings-Dresen MH, de Boer AG. Quality of working life of cancer survivors: associations with health- and work-related variables. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(5):1475–1484.CrossRefPubMed de Jong M, Tamminga SJ, Frings-Dresen MH, de Boer AG. Quality of working life of cancer survivors: associations with health- and work-related variables. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(5):1475–1484.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–409.CrossRefPubMed Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–409.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform Manag. 2004;42(1):15–29.CrossRef Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform Manag. 2004;42(1):15–29.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Negrini A, Corbiere M, Lecomte T, Coutu MF, Nieuwenhuijsen K, St-Arnaud L, et al. How can supervisors contribute to the return to work of employees who have experienced depression? J Occup Rehabil. 2017;28(2):279–288.CrossRef Negrini A, Corbiere M, Lecomte T, Coutu MF, Nieuwenhuijsen K, St-Arnaud L, et al. How can supervisors contribute to the return to work of employees who have experienced depression? J Occup Rehabil. 2017;28(2):279–288.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tamminga SJ, van Hezel S, de Boer AG, Frings-Dresen MH. Enhancing the return to work of cancer survivors: development and feasibility of the nurse-led ehealth intervention cancer@work. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(2):e118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tamminga SJ, van Hezel S, de Boer AG, Frings-Dresen MH. Enhancing the return to work of cancer survivors: development and feasibility of the nurse-led ehealth intervention cancer@work. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(2):e118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Johnston V, Way K, Long MH, Wyatt M, Gibson L, Shaw WS. Supervisor competencies for supporting return to work: a mixed-methods study. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):3–17.CrossRefPubMed Johnston V, Way K, Long MH, Wyatt M, Gibson L, Shaw WS. Supervisor competencies for supporting return to work: a mixed-methods study. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):3–17.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tiedtke C, Dierckx de Casterle B, Donceel P, de Rijk A. Workplace support after breast cancer treatment: recognition of vulnerability. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(19):1770–1776.CrossRefPubMed Tiedtke C, Dierckx de Casterle B, Donceel P, de Rijk A. Workplace support after breast cancer treatment: recognition of vulnerability. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(19):1770–1776.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(3):190–197.CrossRefPubMed Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(3):190–197.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference McKay G, Knott V, Delfabbro P. Return to work and cancer: the Australian experience. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):93–105.CrossRefPubMed McKay G, Knott V, Delfabbro P. Return to work and cancer: the Australian experience. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):93–105.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Tiedtke C, Donceel P, de Rijk A, Dierckx de Casterle B. Return to work following breast cancer treatment: the employers’ side. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(3):399–409.PubMed Tiedtke C, Donceel P, de Rijk A, Dierckx de Casterle B. Return to work following breast cancer treatment: the employers’ side. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(3):399–409.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Stochkendahl MJ, Myburgh C, Young AE, Hartvigsen J. Manager experiences with the return to work process in a large, publically funded, hospital setting: walking a fine line. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):752–762.CrossRefPubMed Stochkendahl MJ, Myburgh C, Young AE, Hartvigsen J. Manager experiences with the return to work process in a large, publically funded, hospital setting: walking a fine line. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):752–762.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Brown RF, Owens M, Bradley C. Employee to employer communication skills: balancing cancer treatment and employment. Psychooncology. 2013;22(2):426–433.PubMed Brown RF, Owens M, Bradley C. Employee to employer communication skills: balancing cancer treatment and employment. Psychooncology. 2013;22(2):426–433.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Amir Z, Wynn P, Chan F, Strauser D, Whitaker S, Luker K. Return to work after cancer in the UK: attitudes and experiences of line managers. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(4):435–442.CrossRefPubMed Amir Z, Wynn P, Chan F, Strauser D, Whitaker S, Luker K. Return to work after cancer in the UK: attitudes and experiences of line managers. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(4):435–442.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakanen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors’ received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(5):427–435.CrossRefPubMed Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakanen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors’ received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(5):427–435.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Tiedtke C, Dierckx de Casterle B, de Rijk A, Christiaens MR, Donceel P. Breast cancer treatment and work disability: patient perspectives. Breast. 2011;20(6):534–538.PubMed Tiedtke C, Dierckx de Casterle B, de Rijk A, Christiaens MR, Donceel P. Breast cancer treatment and work disability: patient perspectives. Breast. 2011;20(6):534–538.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Rowe G, Wright G. The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects—introduction to the special issue. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2011;78(9):1487–1490.CrossRef Rowe G, Wright G. The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects—introduction to the special issue. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2011;78(9):1487–1490.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kristman VL, Shaw WS, Boot CR, Delclos GL, Sullivan MJ, Ehrhart MG, et al. Researching complex and multi-level workplace factors affecting disability and prolonged sickness absence. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):399–416.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kristman VL, Shaw WS, Boot CR, Delclos GL, Sullivan MJ, Ehrhart MG, et al. Researching complex and multi-level workplace factors affecting disability and prolonged sickness absence. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):399–416.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Hoefsmit N, de Rijk A, Houkes I. Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hoefsmit N, de Rijk A, Houkes I. Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
What Employer Actions Are Considered Most Important for the Return to Work of Employees with Cancer? A Delphi Study Among Employees and Employers
Authors
M. A. Greidanus
S. J. Tamminga
A. E. de Rijk
M. H. W. Frings-Dresen
A. G. E. M. de Boer
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9800-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2019 Go to the issue