Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2016

Open Access 01-04-2016

Quality of working life of cancer survivors: development of a cancer-specific questionnaire

Authors: Merel de Jong, Sietske J. Tamminga, Angela G. E. M. de Boer, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to generate, and select quality of working life issues for the development of an initial version of the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS).

Methods

Quality of working life issues were generated through focus groups with cancer survivors and oncological occupational physicians, and interviews with employers, supervisors, and organization officers. A selection of these quality of working life issues was made based on relevance and importance by conducting an online questionnaire among the cancer survivors and oncological occupational physicians. Researchers formulated the issues into items for the QWLQ-CS.

Results

A total of 24 cancer survivors, six oncological occupational physicians and 11 employers, supervisors, and organization officers participated. The 222 quality of working life issues identified through the focus groups, interviews, and literature were converted into an online questionnaire. Cancer survivors (N = 20) found 44 issues not relevant or important with respect to their quality of working life. The researchers reviewed the remaining 178 issues and formulated them into 102 items classified by five categories: work perception, job characteristics, the social structure and environment, organizational characteristics, and the effect of the disease and treatment.

Conclusions

The initial version of the QWLQ-CS exists out of 102 items which cover the experiences and perceptions of cancer survivors in the work environment. All items were indicated by working cancer survivors as relevant and important.

Implications for cancer survivors

This initial version of the QWLQ-CS may increase awareness of the potential problems or emotional difficulties working cancer survivors face during the work continuation process.
Literature
1.
Parry C, Kent EE, Mariotto AB, Alfano CM, Rowland JH. Cancer survivors: a booming population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(10):1996–2005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, De Graaf JH, Balak F, Groothoff JW. Sickness absence and return to work rates in women with breast cancer. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(4):543–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Kuijpens JLP. Cancer in the working population: numbers and trends. [In Dutch: Kanker in de beroepsbevolking: Aantallen en trends]. TBV. 2008;16:281–4.CrossRef
4.
Spelten ER, Sprangers MA, Verbeek JH. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology. 2002;11(2):124–31.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Mellon S, Northouse LL, Weiss LK. A population-based study of the quality of life of cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs. 2006;29(2):120–31. quiz 32–3.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Banning M. Employment and breast cancer: a meta-ethnography. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011;20(6):708–19.CrossRef
8.
Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(3):190–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Tamminga SJ, de Boer AG, Verbeek JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Breast cancer survivors’ views of factors that influence the return-to-work process - a qualitative study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):144–54.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Pearce A, Timmons A, O’Sullivan E, Gallagher P, Gooberman-Hill R, Thomas AA, et al. Long-term workforce participation patterns following head and neck cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2014. doi:10.​1007/​s11764-014-0382-2.PubMed
11.
Feuerstein M, Hansen JA, Calvio LC, Johnson L, Ronquillo JG. Work productivity in brain tumor survivors. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(7):803–11.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Blinder V, Patil S, Eberle C, Griggs J, Maly RC. Early predictors of not returning to work in low-income breast cancer survivors: a 5-year longitudinal study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140(2):407–16.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Chan KW, Wyatt TA. Quality of work life: a study of employees in Shanghai. China Asia Pac Bus Rev. 2007;13(4):501–17.CrossRef
14.
15.
Van Laar D, Edwards JA, Easton S. The work-related quality of life scale for healthcare workers. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60(3):325–33.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Ventegodt S, Andersen NJ, Kandel I, Enevoldsen L, Merrick J. Scientific research in the quality of working-life (QWL): generic measuring of the global working life quality with the SEQWL questionnaire. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2008;7(2):201–17.
17.
Royuela V, López-Tamayo J, Suriñach J. The institutional vs. the academic definition of the quality of work life. What is the focus of the European commission? Soc Indic Res. 2008;86(3):401–15.CrossRef
18.
Murphy L. Job stress research at NIOSH: 1972-2002. In: Perrewé PL, Ganster DC, editors. Research in occupational stress and well-being: historical and current perspectives on stress and health. Kidlington: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2002. p. 1–55.CrossRef
19.
Martel J-P, Dupuis G. Quality of Work Life: theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Soc Indic Res. 2006;77(2):333–68.CrossRef
20.
Brooks BA, Anderson MA. Defining quality of nursing work life. Nurs Econ. 2005;23(6):319–26. 279.PubMed
21.
22.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed
23.
de Jong M, de Boer AG, Tamminga SJ, Frings-Dresen MH. Quality of working life issues of employees with a chronic physical disease: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):182–96.CrossRefPubMed
24.
de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine. A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.CrossRef
25.
Evers J. Designing a focus group interview. [In Dutch: Het ontwerpen van een focusgroep]. In: Evers J, editor. Qualitative interviewing: Art and skills. [In Dutch: Kwalitatief interviewen: Kunst én kunde]. Den Haag: Uitgeverij LEMMA; 2007. p. 97–114.
26.
Liamputtong P. Focus group methodology: principles and practices. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2011.CrossRef
27.
Richiardi L, Boffetta P, Merletti F. Analysis of nonresponse bias in a population-based case-control study on lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(10):1033–40.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(9):643–53.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Borg V, Kristensen TS. Social class and self-rated health: can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment? Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(7):1019–30.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Wells M, Williams B, Firnigl D, Lang H, Coyle J, Kroll T, et al. Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psychooncology. 2013;22(6):1208–19.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):345–53.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Høyer M, Nordin K, Ahlgren J, Bergkvist L, Lambe M, Johansson B, et al. Change in working time in a population-based cohort of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(23):2853–60.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Mehnert A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;77(2):109–30.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Tiedtke C, De Rijk A, De Dierckx de Casterlé B, Christiaens MR, Donceel P. Experiences and concerns about ‘returning to work’ for women breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology. 2010;19(7):677–83.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;27(3):S217–32.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Wiebe S, Guyatt G, Weaver B, Matijevic S, Sidwell C. Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(1):52–60.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Galesic M, Bosnjak M. Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opin Quart. 2009;73(2):349–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quality of working life of cancer survivors: development of a cancer-specific questionnaire
Authors
Merel de Jong
Sietske J. Tamminga
Angela G. E. M. de Boer
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0485-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2016 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Do we reach the patients with the most problems? Baseline data from the WebCan study among survivors of head-and-neck cancer, Denmark

OriginalPaper

Late effects in survivors of central nervous system tumors: reports by patients and proxies

Announcement

Call for manuscripts digital technologies and cancer survivorship

OriginalPaper

Variation in resources needed to implement psychosocial support interventions for rural breast cancer survivors

Review

Effects of radiation therapy on the structure and function of the pelvic floor muscles of patients with cancer in the pelvic area: a systematic review

OriginalPaper

Predictors of financial difficulties and work modifications among cancer survivors in the United States
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits