Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2010

01-12-2010

Return to Work After Cancer in the UK: Attitudes and Experiences of Line Managers

Authors: Ziv Amir, Phil Wynn, Fong Chan, David Strauser, Stuart Whitaker, Karen Luker

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction With improvements in diagnosis, treatment and survival rates, returning to work after cancer is of increasing importance to individuals and employers. Although line managers can play a potentially important role in the return to work process, research thus far has focused on the return to work process from the perspective of cancer survivors. Aim To explore the attitudes of line managers towards employees with a cancer diagnosis. Methods A short self-administered, on-line questionnaire was circulated to managers in the North East of England. Factorial structures of the line managers’ attitudes survey was examined using exploratory factor analysis and the effect of demographic characteristics and organisational variable on the attitudes of line managers was examined using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Results Line managers’ attitudes can be conceptualized according to five empirical factors: (a) fearful attitudes towards cancer survivors, (b) supportive attitudes, (c) line-managers’ perceived burden, (d) maintaining normality, and (e) financial benefits issues. Overall, line-managers hold relatively positive attitudes toward cancer survivors and are willing to support them in their effort to return to work. However, managers tend to harbour negative attitudes regarding the individual cancer survivors’ ability both to engage in work related activities and in meeting the demands of employment. MANOVA results also indicated that female managers hold more positive attitudes than male managers toward cancer diagnosis, less concerned about workload burdens of working with cancer survivors, and more willing to help cancer survivors maintain normality. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that employers/line-managers need to be provided with training, support, and resources to help them facilitate employment and job retention of employees diagnosed with cancer.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12:190–7.CrossRefPubMed Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12:190–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:83–92.CrossRefPubMed Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:83–92.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakkinen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors’ received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:427–35.CrossRefPubMed Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakkinen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors’ received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:427–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Taskila T, Martikainen R, Hietanen P, Lindbohm ML. Comparative study of work ability between cancer survivors and their referents. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:914–20.CrossRefPubMed Taskila T, Martikainen R, Hietanen P, Lindbohm ML. Comparative study of work ability between cancer survivors and their referents. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:914–20.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:345–53.CrossRefPubMed Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:345–53.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J, Brisson C, Masse B, Deschenes L. Work situation after breast cancer: results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1813–22.CrossRefPubMed Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J, Brisson C, Masse B, Deschenes L. Work situation after breast cancer: results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1813–22.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Perry EL, Kuhlik CT. The devolution of HR to the line: implications for perceptions of people management effectiveness. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2008;19:262–73. Perry EL, Kuhlik CT. The devolution of HR to the line: implications for perceptions of people management effectiveness. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2008;19:262–73.
9.
go back to reference Heraty N, Morley M. Line managers and human resource development. J Eur Indust Train. 1995;19:31–7.CrossRef Heraty N, Morley M. Line managers and human resource development. J Eur Indust Train. 1995;19:31–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Renwick D. Line manager involvement in HRM: an inside view. Employee Relat. 2003;25:262–80.CrossRef Renwick D. Line manager involvement in HRM: an inside view. Employee Relat. 2003;25:262–80.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thornhill A, Saunders MNK. What if line managers don’t realise they’re responsible for HR? Lessons from an organisation experiencing rapid change. Pers Rev. 1998;27:460–76.CrossRef Thornhill A, Saunders MNK. What if line managers don’t realise they’re responsible for HR? Lessons from an organisation experiencing rapid change. Pers Rev. 1998;27:460–76.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bond S, Wise S. Family leave policies and devolution to the line. Pers Rev. 2003;32:58–72.CrossRef Bond S, Wise S. Family leave policies and devolution to the line. Pers Rev. 2003;32:58–72.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cunningham I, Hyman J. Devolving human resource responsibilities to the line: beginning of the end or a new beginning for personnel? Pers Rev. 1999;28:9–27.CrossRef Cunningham I, Hyman J. Devolving human resource responsibilities to the line: beginning of the end or a new beginning for personnel? Pers Rev. 1999;28:9–27.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, de Boer AGEM, Blonk RWB, van Dijk FJH. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:817–23.CrossRefPubMed Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, de Boer AGEM, Blonk RWB, van Dijk FJH. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:817–23.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kushnir T, Luria O. Supervisors’ attitudes towards return to work after myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44:331–7.CrossRefPubMed Kushnir T, Luria O. Supervisors’ attitudes towards return to work after myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44:331–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cunningham I, James P, Dibben P. Bridging the gap between rhetoric and reality: line managers and the protection of job security for ill workers in the modern workplace. Br J Manage. 2004;15:273–90.CrossRef Cunningham I, James P, Dibben P. Bridging the gap between rhetoric and reality: line managers and the protection of job security for ill workers in the modern workplace. Br J Manage. 2004;15:273–90.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Amir Z, Wynn P, Whitaker S, Luker K. Cancer survivorship and return to work: a survey of UK occupational physician experience. Occup Med. 2009;59(6):390–6.CrossRef Amir Z, Wynn P, Whitaker S, Luker K. Cancer survivorship and return to work: a survey of UK occupational physician experience. Occup Med. 2009;59(6):390–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cook C, Heath F, Thompson R. A meta analysis of responses rates in web or internet based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60:821–36.CrossRef Cook C, Heath F, Thompson R. A meta analysis of responses rates in web or internet based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60:821–36.CrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Chan F, Cardoso L, Copeland J, Jones R, Fraser R. Workplace accommodations. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Handbook of cancer survivorship and work. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 223–54. Chan F, Cardoso L, Copeland J, Jones R, Fraser R. Workplace accommodations. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Handbook of cancer survivorship and work. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 223–54.
22.
go back to reference Amir Z, Strauser D, Chan F. Employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Work and cancer survivors. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 73–89. Amir Z, Strauser D, Chan F. Employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. In: Feuerstein M, editor. Work and cancer survivors. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 73–89.
Metadata
Title
Return to Work After Cancer in the UK: Attitudes and Experiences of Line Managers
Authors
Ziv Amir
Phil Wynn
Fong Chan
David Strauser
Stuart Whitaker
Karen Luker
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9197-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2010 Go to the issue