Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 3/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Paper

Assessment of a transcatheter heart valve prosthesis with multidetector computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo imaging characteristics

Authors: Linda M. de Heer, Jesse Habets, Jolanda Kluin, Pieter R. Stella, Willem P. Th. M. Mali, Lex A. van Herwerden, Ricardo P. J. Budde

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) image quality (IQ) of the commonly implanted Sapien prosthesis was assessed both in vitro and in vivo. The prosthesis was imaged in an in vitro model with a 256-slice CT system under pulsatile conditions using three protocols (1) retrospectively ECG-gating at 120 kV/600 mAs and (2) 140 kV/406 mAs, and (3) prospective triggering at 120 kV/210 mAs (10 acquisitions per protocol). After reconstruction in three perpendicular planes, IQ of the supra-,peri-,sub-,and intraprosthetic as well as leaflet regions was scored on a four-point scale (1 = non-diagnostic, 2 = moderate, 3 = good and 4 = excellent) by two observers. IQ was also assessed for twenty-one post-operative scans. The in vitro scans of the two retrospective protocols and twenty-one in vivo scans were analyzed during systole and diastole. The prospectively triggered scans were analyzed during diastole. Except for the valve leaflets in 5 systolic reconstructions, the in vitro scores were moderate to excellent. In vivo, 7 systolic and 3 diastolic reconstructions of the valve leaflets were non-diagnostic as well as 3 peri-prosthetic regions in diastole. All other scores were moderate to excellent. The Sapien prosthesis surrounded by a radiopaque stainless steel stent can be visualized with MDCT with moderate to good IQ, except for the valve leaflet region that has generally non-diagnostic or moderate IQ.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humprhies K et al (2007) Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116:755–763PubMedCrossRef Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humprhies K et al (2007) Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116:755–763PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Walther T, Falk V, Kempfert J et al (2008) Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: the initial 50 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:983–988PubMedCrossRef Walther T, Falk V, Kempfert J et al (2008) Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: the initial 50 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:983–988PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Walther T, Simon P, Dewey T et al (2007) Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation 116:1240–1245CrossRef Walther T, Simon P, Dewey T et al (2007) Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation 116:1240–1245CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL (2011) Feasibility and accuracy of a comprehensive multidetector row computed tomography acquisition for patients referred for balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 161:1106–1113PubMedCrossRef Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL (2011) Feasibility and accuracy of a comprehensive multidetector row computed tomography acquisition for patients referred for balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 161:1106–1113PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kurra V, Schoenhagen P, Roselli EE et al (2009) Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(5):1258–1264PubMedCrossRef Kurra V, Schoenhagen P, Roselli EE et al (2009) Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(5):1258–1264PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multi-slice computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 1:321–330 Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multi-slice computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 1:321–330
7.
go back to reference Delgado V, Ng AC, van de Veire NR et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 31:1114–1123PubMedCrossRef Delgado V, Ng AC, van de Veire NR et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 31:1114–1123PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koos R, Altiok E, Mahnken AH et al (2012) Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 158:353–358 Koos R, Altiok E, Mahnken AH et al (2012) Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 158:353–358
9.
go back to reference Wood DA, Tops LF, Mayo JR et al (2009) Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 103(9):1295–1301PubMedCrossRef Wood DA, Tops LF, Mayo JR et al (2009) Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 103(9):1295–1301PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schultz CJ, Weustink A, Piazza N et al (2009) Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:911–918PubMedCrossRef Schultz CJ, Weustink A, Piazza N et al (2009) Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:911–918PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Koos R, Mahnken AH, Dohmen G et al (2011) Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 150:142–145PubMedCrossRef Koos R, Mahnken AH, Dohmen G et al (2011) Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 150:142–145PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Caudron J, Fares J, Hauville C et al (2011) Evaluation of multislice computed tomography early after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis. Am J Cardiol 108:873–881 Caudron J, Fares J, Hauville C et al (2011) Evaluation of multislice computed tomography early after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis. Am J Cardiol 108:873–881
13.
go back to reference Habets J, Symersky P, van Herwerden LA et al (2011) Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT: imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients. Eur Radiol 21:1390–1396PubMedCrossRef Habets J, Symersky P, van Herwerden LA et al (2011) Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT: imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients. Eur Radiol 21:1390–1396PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Symersky P, Budde RPJ, Prokop M, De Mol BAJM (2011) Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging characteristics of mechanical prosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis 20:216–222PubMed Symersky P, Budde RPJ, Prokop M, De Mol BAJM (2011) Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging characteristics of mechanical prosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis 20:216–222PubMed
15.
go back to reference Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnul JG et al (2009) Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:975–1014PubMedCrossRef Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnul JG et al (2009) Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:975–1014PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 122:e525–e555PubMedCrossRef Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 122:e525–e555PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Habets J, Budde RP, Symersky P et al (2011) Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Nat Rev Cardiol 8:466–478PubMedCrossRef Habets J, Budde RP, Symersky P et al (2011) Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Nat Rev Cardiol 8:466–478PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Konen E, Goitein O, Feinberg MS et al (2008) The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 191:26–31CrossRef Konen E, Goitein O, Feinberg MS et al (2008) The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 191:26–31CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Symersky P, Budde RPJ, De Mol BA, Prokop M (2009) Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 104:1128–1134PubMedCrossRef Symersky P, Budde RPJ, De Mol BA, Prokop M (2009) Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 104:1128–1134PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y et al (2009) Correctness of multidetector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative finding as a gold standard. Eur Radiol 19:857–867PubMedCrossRef Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y et al (2009) Correctness of multidetector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative finding as a gold standard. Eur Radiol 19:857–867PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Symersky P, Budde RPJ, De Mol BA, Prokop M (2009) Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 104:1128–1134PubMedCrossRef Symersky P, Budde RPJ, De Mol BA, Prokop M (2009) Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 104:1128–1134PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chenot F, Montant P, Goffinet C et al (2010) Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Radiology 255:377–385PubMedCrossRef Chenot F, Montant P, Goffinet C et al (2010) Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Radiology 255:377–385PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sherif MA, Abdel-Wahab M, Beurich HW et al (2011) Haemodynamic evaluation of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eurointervention 7:57–63PubMedCrossRef Sherif MA, Abdel-Wahab M, Beurich HW et al (2011) Haemodynamic evaluation of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eurointervention 7:57–63PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Roques F, Nashef SAM, Michel P et al (1999) Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the euroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:816–823PubMedCrossRef Roques F, Nashef SAM, Michel P et al (1999) Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the euroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:816–823PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of a transcatheter heart valve prosthesis with multidetector computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo imaging characteristics
Authors
Linda M. de Heer
Jesse Habets
Jolanda Kluin
Pieter R. Stella
Willem P. Th. M. Mali
Lex A. van Herwerden
Ricardo P. J. Budde
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0111-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 3/2013 Go to the issue