Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 01-03-2013 | Original Paper

Inter-individual variance and cardiac cycle dependency of aortic root dimensions and shape as assessed by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is it crucial for correct sizing?

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the inter-individual variance and the variability of the aortic root dimensions during the cardiac cycle by computed tomography (CT) in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Fifty-six patients (m/w = 16/40, 81 ± 6.8 years), scheduled for a transapical aortic valve implantation with available preprocedural ECG-gated CT were retrospectively included. The evaluation included sizing of the aortic annulus and the aortic sinus, measurements of the coronary topography, aortic valve planimetry and scoring of calcification. The new defined aortic annulus sphericity ratio revealed a mostly elliptical shape with increasing diastolic deformation. The calculated effective diameter (ED), determined from the annulus’ lumen area, turned out to be the parameter least affected from cardiac cycle changes while systolic and diastolic annulus dimensions and shape (diameter and area) differed significantly (p < 0.001). In about 70 % of the patients with relevant paravalvular leaks the finally implanted prosthesis was too small according to the CT based calculated ED. The ostial height of the coronaries showed a high variability with a critical minimum range <5 mm. The degree of the aortic calcification did not have an influence on the aortic annulus deformation during the cardiac cycle, but on the occurrence of paravalvular leaks. The aortic root anatomy demonstrated a high inter-individual variability and cardiac cycle dependency. These results must be strongly considered during the patient evaluation prior to TAVI to avoid complications. The systolic effective diameter, as measured by ECG-gated CT, represents an appropriate parameter for sizing the aortic annulus.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364(23):2187–2198PubMedCrossRef Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364(23):2187–2198PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363(17):1597–1607PubMedCrossRef Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363(17):1597–1607PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Delgado V, Ewe SH, Ng AC, van der Kley F, Marsan NA, Schuijf JD et al (2010) Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: key steps to assess procedural feasibility. EuroIntervention 6(5):643–652PubMedCrossRef Delgado V, Ewe SH, Ng AC, van der Kley F, Marsan NA, Schuijf JD et al (2010) Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: key steps to assess procedural feasibility. EuroIntervention 6(5):643–652PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaleschke G, Seifarth H, Kerckhoff G, Reinecke H, Baumgartner H (2010) Imaging decision-making for transfemoral or transapical approach of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention 6(Suppl G):G20–G27PubMed Kaleschke G, Seifarth H, Kerckhoff G, Reinecke H, Baumgartner H (2010) Imaging decision-making for transfemoral or transapical approach of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention 6(Suppl G):G20–G27PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lehmkuhl LH, von Aspern K, Foldyna B, Grothoff M, Nitzsche S, Kempfert J et al (2012) Comparison of aortic root measurements in patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) using three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT): differences and variability. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0081-x Lehmkuhl LH, von Aspern K, Foldyna B, Grothoff M, Nitzsche S, Kempfert J et al (2012) Comparison of aortic root measurements in patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) using three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT): differences and variability. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.​1007/​s10554-012-0081-x
6.
go back to reference Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V, Schuijf JD, Mayo JR, Pasupati S et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(3):321–330PubMedCrossRef Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V, Schuijf JD, Mayo JR, Pasupati S et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(3):321–330PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wood DA, Tops LF, Mayo JR, Pasupati S, Schalij MJ, Humphries K et al (2009) Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 103(9):1295–1301PubMedCrossRef Wood DA, Tops LF, Mayo JR, Pasupati S, Schalij MJ, Humphries K et al (2009) Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 103(9):1295–1301PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference de Heer LM, Budde RP, Mali WP, de Vos AM, van Herwerden LA, Kluin J (2011) Aortic root dimension changes during systole and diastole: evaluation with ECG-gated multidetector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(8):1195–1204PubMedCrossRef de Heer LM, Budde RP, Mali WP, de Vos AM, van Herwerden LA, Kluin J (2011) Aortic root dimension changes during systole and diastole: evaluation with ECG-gated multidetector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(8):1195–1204PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bertaso AG, Wong DT, Liew GY, Cunnington MS, Richardson JD, Thomson VS et al (2012) Aortic annulus dimension assessment by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: differences between systole and diastole. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi10.1007/s10554-012-0018-4 Bertaso AG, Wong DT, Liew GY, Cunnington MS, Richardson JD, Thomson VS et al (2012) Aortic annulus dimension assessment by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: differences between systole and diastole. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi10.​1007/​s10554-012-0018-4
10.
go back to reference Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, Becker AE, Serruys PW, Anderson RH (2008) Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1(1):74–81PubMedCrossRef Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, Becker AE, Serruys PW, Anderson RH (2008) Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1(1):74–81PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L, Rastan AJ, Holzhey D, Blumenstein J et al (2012) Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic vs. computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L, Rastan AJ, Holzhey D, Blumenstein J et al (2012) Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic vs. computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg
12.
go back to reference Doddamani S, Grushko MJ, Makaryus AN, Jain VR, Bello R, Friedman MA et al (2009) Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by 64-slice multi-detector CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(2):175–181PubMedCrossRef Doddamani S, Grushko MJ, Makaryus AN, Jain VR, Bello R, Friedman MA et al (2009) Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by 64-slice multi-detector CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(2):175–181PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Walther T, Dewey T, Borger MA, Kempfert J, Linke A, Becht R et al (2009) Transapical aortic valve implantation: step by step. Ann Thorac Surg 87(1):276–283PubMedCrossRef Walther T, Dewey T, Borger MA, Kempfert J, Linke A, Becht R et al (2009) Transapical aortic valve implantation: step by step. Ann Thorac Surg 87(1):276–283PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832PubMedCrossRef Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abdel-Wahab M, Zahn R, Horack M, Gerckens U, Schuler G, Sievert H et al (2011) Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence and early outcome. Results from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry. Heart 97(11):899–906PubMedCrossRef Abdel-Wahab M, Zahn R, Horack M, Gerckens U, Schuler G, Sievert H et al (2011) Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence and early outcome. Results from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry. Heart 97(11):899–906PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tzikas A, Schultz C, Piazza N, Moelker A, Van Mieghem N, Nuis R, et al (2011) Assessment of the aortic annulus by multi-slice computed tomography, contrast aortography and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77(6):868–875 Tzikas A, Schultz C, Piazza N, Moelker A, Van Mieghem N, Nuis R, et al (2011) Assessment of the aortic annulus by multi-slice computed tomography, contrast aortography and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77(6):868–875
17.
go back to reference Hutter A, Opitz A, Bleiziffer S, Ruge H, Hettich I, Mazzitelli D et al (2010) Aortic annulus evaluation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76(7):1009–1019PubMedCrossRef Hutter A, Opitz A, Bleiziffer S, Ruge H, Hettich I, Mazzitelli D et al (2010) Aortic annulus evaluation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76(7):1009–1019PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Haensig M, Lehmkuhl L, Rastan AJ, Kempfert J, Mukherjee C, Gutberlet M, et al (2012) Aortic valve calcium scoring is a predictor of significant paravalvular aortic insufficiency in transapical-aortic valve implantation. Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surg 41(6):1234–1240 Haensig M, Lehmkuhl L, Rastan AJ, Kempfert J, Mukherjee C, Gutberlet M, et al (2012) Aortic valve calcium scoring is a predictor of significant paravalvular aortic insufficiency in transapical-aortic valve implantation. Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surg 41(6):1234–1240
19.
go back to reference Anderson RH, Lal M, Ho SY (1996) Anatomy of the aortic root with particular emphasis on options for its surgical enlargement. J Heart Valve Dis 5(Suppl 3):S249–S257PubMed Anderson RH, Lal M, Ho SY (1996) Anatomy of the aortic root with particular emphasis on options for its surgical enlargement. J Heart Valve Dis 5(Suppl 3):S249–S257PubMed
20.
go back to reference Delgado V, Ng AC, van de Veire NR, van der Kley F, Schuijf JD, Tops LF et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 31(9):1114–1123PubMedCrossRef Delgado V, Ng AC, van de Veire NR, van der Kley F, Schuijf JD, Tops LF et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 31(9):1114–1123PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zegdi R, Ciobotaru V, Noghin M, Sleilaty G, Lafont A, Latrémouille C et al (2008) Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent? Results from a human anatomic study in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(5):579–584PubMedCrossRef Zegdi R, Ciobotaru V, Noghin M, Sleilaty G, Lafont A, Latrémouille C et al (2008) Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent? Results from a human anatomic study in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(5):579–584PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, Ricci DR, Carere RG, Munt BI et al (2006) Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 113(6):842–850PubMedCrossRef Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, Ricci DR, Carere RG, Munt BI et al (2006) Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 113(6):842–850PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Grube E, Laborde JC, Gerckens U, Felderhoff T, Sauren B, Buellesfeld L et al (2006) Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study. Circulation 114(15):1616–1624PubMedCrossRef Grube E, Laborde JC, Gerckens U, Felderhoff T, Sauren B, Buellesfeld L et al (2006) Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study. Circulation 114(15):1616–1624PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Inter-individual variance and cardiac cycle dependency of aortic root dimensions and shape as assessed by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is it crucial for correct sizing?
Publication date
01-03-2013
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0123-4