Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 4/2012

01-04-2012 | Original Paper

Reproducibility of coronary plaque detection and characterization using low radiation dose coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease (ReSCAN study)

Authors: Kristian Altern Øvrehus, Mohamed Marwan, Hans Erik Bøtker, Stephan Achenbach, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the interscan, interobserver and intraobserver agreement for coronary plaque detection, and characterization using low radiation dose high-pitch spiral acquisition coronary CT angiography (CTA). Two experienced observers independently evaluated coronary CTA datasets from 50 consecutive patients undergoing two 128-slice dual source CT scans within 12 days. Mean (±SD) estimated radiation exposure was 1.5 ± 0.2 mSv per scan. Observers recorded the presence and characterization of coronary plaques as non-calcified or calcified. A “segment involvement score” (SIS) was computed by summing the numbers of segments with any coronary plaque per patient. Reproducibility was assessed using kappa (κ) statistics, paired t test and Bland–Altman analyses. Interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver agreement (κ-values) for detection of any or calcified plaques were 83–94% (κ-values 0.57–0.85), and 67–84% (0.31–0.67) for non-calcified plaques on a patient level. No significant difference was observed in mean interscan or interobserver SIS. Mean (95% CI) intraobserver SIS difference was −0.88 (−1.25; −0.51), P < 0.001, with limits of agreement from −4.7 to 2.9. Low radiation dose high-pitch coronary CTA permits detection of any or calcified plaques with high interscan, interobserver, intraobserver agreement. However, variability for the detection of non-calcified plaque is substantial.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M (2010) Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 152:167–177PubMed Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M (2010) Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 152:167–177PubMed
2.
go back to reference Chow BJ, Wells GA, Chen L et al (2010) Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1017–1028PubMedCrossRef Chow BJ, Wells GA, Chen L et al (2010) Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1017–1028PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB et al (2007) Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1161–1170PubMedCrossRef Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB et al (2007) Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1161–1170PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H et al (2009) Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:49–57PubMedCrossRef Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H et al (2009) Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:49–57PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:672–677PubMedCrossRef Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:672–677PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A et al (2004) Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1241–1247PubMedCrossRef Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A et al (2004) Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1241–1247PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Petranovic M, Soni A, Bezzera H et al (2009) Assessment of nonstenotic coronary lesions by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in comparison to intravascular ultrasound: evaluation of nonculprit coronary lesions. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:24–31PubMedCrossRef Petranovic M, Soni A, Bezzera H et al (2009) Assessment of nonstenotic coronary lesions by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in comparison to intravascular ultrasound: evaluation of nonculprit coronary lesions. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:24–31PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ferencik M, Nieman K, Achenbach S (2006) Noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque detection by contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography: a study of interobserver agreement. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:207–209PubMedCrossRef Ferencik M, Nieman K, Achenbach S (2006) Noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque detection by contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography: a study of interobserver agreement. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:207–209PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hoffmann H, Frieler K, Hamm B, Dewey M (2008) Intra- and interobserver variability in detection and assessment of calcified and noncalcified coronary artery plaques using 64-slice computed tomography: variability in coronary plaque measurement using MSCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:735–742PubMedCrossRef Hoffmann H, Frieler K, Hamm B, Dewey M (2008) Intra- and interobserver variability in detection and assessment of calcified and noncalcified coronary artery plaques using 64-slice computed tomography: variability in coronary plaque measurement using MSCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:735–742PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pagali SR, Madaj P, Gupta M et al (2010) Interobserver variations of plaque severity score and segment stenosis score in coronary arteries using 64 slice multidetector computed tomography: a substudy of the ACCURACY trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 4:312–318PubMedCrossRef Pagali SR, Madaj P, Gupta M et al (2010) Interobserver variations of plaque severity score and segment stenosis score in coronary arteries using 64 slice multidetector computed tomography: a substudy of the ACCURACY trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 4:312–318PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Saur SC, Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P et al (2010) Effect of reader experience on variability, evaluation time and accuracy of coronary plaque detection with computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 20:1599–1606PubMedCrossRef Saur SC, Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P et al (2010) Effect of reader experience on variability, evaluation time and accuracy of coronary plaque detection with computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 20:1599–1606PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lehman SJ, Schlett CL, Bamberg F et al (2009) Assessment of coronary plaque progression in coronary computed tomography angiography using a semiquantitative score. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:1262–1270PubMedCrossRef Lehman SJ, Schlett CL, Bamberg F et al (2009) Assessment of coronary plaque progression in coronary computed tomography angiography using a semiquantitative score. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:1262–1270PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cheng VY, Nakazato R, Dey D et al (2009) Reproducibility of coronary artery plaque volume and composition quantification by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: an intraobserver, interobserver, and interscan variability study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:312–320PubMedCrossRef Cheng VY, Nakazato R, Dey D et al (2009) Reproducibility of coronary artery plaque volume and composition quantification by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: an intraobserver, interobserver, and interscan variability study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:312–320PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 31:340–346PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 31:340–346PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Diamond GA, Forrester JS (1979) Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 300:1350–1358PubMedCrossRef Diamond GA, Forrester JS (1979) Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 300:1350–1358PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ovrehus KA, Jensen JK, Mickley HF et al (2010) Comparison of usefulness of exercise testing versus coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 105:773–779PubMedCrossRef Ovrehus KA, Jensen JK, Mickley HF et al (2010) Comparison of usefulness of exercise testing versus coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 105:773–779PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Diamond GA (1983) A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort. J Am Coll Cardiol 1:574–575PubMedCrossRef Diamond GA (1983) A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort. J Am Coll Cardiol 1:574–575PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832PubMedCrossRef Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:122–136PubMedCrossRef Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:122–136PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG et al (2009) European guidelines for multislice computed tomography: 2004 CT quality criteria, Appendix C Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG et al (2009) European guidelines for multislice computed tomography: 2004 CT quality criteria, Appendix C
21.
go back to reference Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Berman DS et al (2008) Task force 13: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (computed tomography) endorsed by the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:409–414PubMedCrossRef Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Berman DS et al (2008) Task force 13: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (computed tomography) endorsed by the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:409–414PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sim J, Wright CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85:257–268PubMed Sim J, Wright CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85:257–268PubMed
23.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dey D, Cheng VY, Slomka PJ et al (2009) Automated 3-dimensional quantification of noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:372–382PubMedCrossRef Dey D, Cheng VY, Slomka PJ et al (2009) Automated 3-dimensional quantification of noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:372–382PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reproducibility of coronary plaque detection and characterization using low radiation dose coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease (ReSCAN study)
Authors
Kristian Altern Øvrehus
Mohamed Marwan
Hans Erik Bøtker
Stephan Achenbach
Bjarne Linde Nørgaard
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9895-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 4/2012 Go to the issue