Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 7/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Paper

Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience

Authors: Márcio Sommer Bittencourt, Bernhard Schmidt, Martin Seltmann, Gerd Muschiol, Dieter Ropers, Werner Günther Daniel, Stephan Achenbach

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Improvements in image quality in cardiac computed tomography may be achieved through iterative image reconstruction techniques. We evaluated the ability of “Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space” (IRIS) reconstruction to reduce image noise and improve subjective image quality. 55 consecutive patients undergoing coronary CT angiography to rule out coronary artery stenosis were included. A dual source CT system and standard protocols were used. Images were reconstructed using standard filtered back projection and IRIS. Image noise, attenuation within the coronary arteries, contrast, signal to noise and contrast to noise parameters as well as subjective classification of image quality (using a scale with four categories) were evaluated and compared between the two image reconstruction protocols. Subjective image quality (2.8 ± 0.4 in filtered back projection and 2.8 ± 0.4 in iterative reconstruction) and the number of “evaluable” segments per patient 14.0 ± 1.2 in filtered back projection and 14.1 ± 1.1 in iterative reconstruction) were not significant different between the two methods. However iterative reconstruction had a lower image noise (22.6 ± 4.5 HU vs. 28.6 ± 5.1 HU) and higher signal to noise and image to noise ratios in the proximal coronary arteries. IRIS reduces image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio in coronary CT angiography, thus providing potential for reducing radiation exposure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference (2007) CT market summary report. IMV Medical Information Division, Des Plaines (2007) CT market summary report. IMV Medical Information Division, Des Plaines
2.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, Saini S (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, Saini S (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Linton OW, Mettler FA Jr (2003) National conference on dose reduction in CT with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR 181:321–329PubMed Linton OW, Mettler FA Jr (2003) National conference on dose reduction in CT with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR 181:321–329PubMed
4.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, Gerber TC, McCollough C, Martinoff S, Kastrati A, Schömig A, Achenbach S (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301(5):500–507PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, Gerber TC, McCollough C, Martinoff S, Kastrati A, Schömig A, Achenbach S (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301(5):500–507PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gerber TC, Kantor B, McCollough CH (2009) Radiation dose and safety in cardiac computed tomography. Cardiol Clin 27(4):665–677PubMedCrossRef Gerber TC, Kantor B, McCollough CH (2009) Radiation dose and safety in cardiac computed tomography. Cardiol Clin 27(4):665–677PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Knesaurek K, Machac J, Vallabhajosula S, Buchsbaum MS (1996) A new iterative reconstruction technique for attenuation correction in high-resolution positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 23(6):656–661PubMedCrossRef Knesaurek K, Machac J, Vallabhajosula S, Buchsbaum MS (1996) A new iterative reconstruction technique for attenuation correction in high-resolution positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 23(6):656–661PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Liow JS, Strother SC, Rehm K, Rottenberg DA (1997) Improved resolution for PET volume imaging through three-dimensional iterative reconstruction. J Nucl Med 38(10):1623–1631PubMed Liow JS, Strother SC, Rehm K, Rottenberg DA (1997) Improved resolution for PET volume imaging through three-dimensional iterative reconstruction. J Nucl Med 38(10):1623–1631PubMed
9.
go back to reference Wang G, Yu H, De Man B (2008) An outlook on X-ray CT research and development. Med Phys 35:1051–1064PubMedCrossRef Wang G, Yu H, De Man B (2008) An outlook on X-ray CT research and development. Med Phys 35:1051–1064PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544PubMedCrossRef Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, Taylor C, Dunning A, Earls JP (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(3):649–654PubMedCrossRef Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, Taylor C, Dunning A, Earls JP (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(3):649–654PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K, Deak P, Kalender WA, Uder M, Achenbach S (2009) High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results. Invest Radiol 44(11):728–733PubMedCrossRef Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K, Deak P, Kalender WA, Uder M, Achenbach S (2009) High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results. Invest Radiol 44(11):728–733PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, Frauenfelder T, Leschka S, Husmann L, Flohr TG, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, Alkadhi H (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599PubMedCrossRef Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, Frauenfelder T, Leschka S, Husmann L, Flohr TG, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, Alkadhi H (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Anders K, Wenkel E, Pohle K, Kachelriess M, Derlien H, Kalender WA, Daniel WG, Bautz W, Baum U (2003) Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron-beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 38:119–128PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Anders K, Wenkel E, Pohle K, Kachelriess M, Derlien H, Kalender WA, Daniel WG, Bautz W, Baum U (2003) Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron-beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 38:119–128PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, Dubinsky TJ, Warren BH, Caldwell JH (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248(2):431–437PubMedCrossRef Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, Dubinsky TJ, Warren BH, Caldwell JH (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248(2):431–437PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K, Kuettner A, Daniel WG, Uder M, Lell MM (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 31(3):340–346PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K, Kuettner A, Daniel WG, Uder M, Lell MM (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 31(3):340–346PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. Am J Radiol 193:764–771 Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. Am J Radiol 193:764–771
Metadata
Title
Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience
Authors
Márcio Sommer Bittencourt
Bernhard Schmidt
Martin Seltmann
Gerd Muschiol
Dieter Ropers
Werner Günther Daniel
Stephan Achenbach
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9756-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 7/2011 Go to the issue