Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Cancer Causes & Control
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 7/2014

01-07-2014 | Review

What causes breast cancer? A systematic review of causal attributions among breast cancer survivors and how these compare to expert-endorsed risk factors

Authors: Jo Anne Dumalaon-Canaria, Amanda D. Hutchinson, Ivanka Prichard, Carlene Wilson

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 7/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper was to review published research that analyzed causal attributions for breast cancer among women previously diagnosed with breast cancer. These attributions were compared with risk factors identified by published scientific evidence in order to determine the level of agreement between cancer survivors’ attributions and expert opinion.

Methods

A comprehensive search for articles, published between 1982 and 2012, reporting studies on causal attributions for breast cancer among patients and survivors was undertaken. Of 5,135 potentially relevant articles, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Two additional articles were sourced from reference lists of included studies.

Results

Results indicated a consistent belief among survivors that their own breast cancer could be attributed to family history, environmental factors, stress, fate, or chance. Lifestyle factors were less frequently identified, despite expert health information highlighting the importance of these factors in controlling and modifying cancer risk. This review demonstrated that misperceptions about the contribution of modifiable lifestyle factors to the risk of breast cancer have remained largely unchanged over the past 30 years.

Conclusions

The findings of this review indicate that beliefs about the causes of breast cancer among affected women are not always consistent with the judgement of experts. Breast cancer survivors did not regularly identify causal factors supported by expert consensus such as age, physical inactivity, breast density, alcohol consumption, and reproductive history. Further research examining psychological predictors of attributions and the impact of cancer prevention messages on adjustment and well-being of cancer survivors is warranted.
Footnotes
1
*Search term and its derivatives were used (e.g., cause, causes, causal).
 
Literature
1.
2.
Barraclough J (1999) Cancer and emotion: a practical guide to psycho-oncology, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester
3.
Hill J, Holcombe C, Clark L, Boothby MR, Hincks A, Fisher J, Tufail S, Salmon P (2011) Predictors of onset of depression and anxiety in the year after diagnosis of breast cancer. Psychol Med. doi:10.​1017/​S003329171000186​8
4.
Janoff-Bulman R (1992) Shattered assumptions. Free Press, New York
5.
Roesch SC, Weiner B (2001) A meta-analytic review of coping with illness: do causal attributions matter? J Psychosom Res 50:205–219
6.
Michela JL, Wood JV (1986) Causal attributions in health and illness. In: Kendall PC (ed) Advances in cognitive behavioral research and therapy, vol 5. Academic Press, New York, pp 179–235CrossRef
7.
8.
Weiner B (1986) An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
9.
10.
Shiloh S, Rashuk-Rosenthal DR, Benyamini Y (2002) Illness causal attributions: an exploratory study of their structure and association with other illness cognition and perceptions of control. J Behav Med 25:379–394CrossRef
11.
Lykins EL, Graue LO, Brechting EH, Roach AR, Gochett CG, Andrykowski MA (2008) Beliefs about cancer causation and prevention as a function of personal and family history of cancer: a national, population-based study. Psychooncology. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1306 PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
13.
14.
Baider L, Sarell M (1983) Perceptions and causal attributions of Israeli women with breast cancer concerning their illness: the effects of ethnicity and religiosity. Psychother Psychosom 39:136–143PubMedCrossRef
15.
Taylor SE, Lichtman RR, Wood JV (1984) Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 46:489–502PubMedCrossRef
16.
Willcox SJ, Stewart BW, Sitas F (2011) What factors do cancer patients believe contribute to the development of their cancer? (New South Wales, Australia). Cancer Causes Control. doi:10.​1007/​s10552-011-9824-6
17.
Parkin DM, Boyd L, Walker LC (2011) 16. The fraction of cancer attributable to lifestyle and environmental factors in the UK in 2010. Br J Cancer. doi:10.​1038/​bjc.​2011.​489
18.
19.
Wang C, Miller SM, Egleston BL, Hay JL, Weinberg DS (2010) Beliefs about the causes of breast and colorectal cancer among women in the general population. Cancer Causes Control. doi:10.​1007/​s10552-009-9439-3
20.
21.
Friedman LC, Romero C, Elledge R, Chang J, Kalidas M, Dulay MF, Lynch GR, Osborne C (2007) Attribution of blame, self-forgiving attitude and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. J Behav Med 30:351–357PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
24.
Rabin C, Pinto B (2006) Cancer-related beliefs and health behavior change among breast cancer survivors and their first-degree relatives. Psychooncology. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1000
25.
Rees G, Fry A, Cull A (2001) A family history of breast cancer: women’s experiences from a theoretical perspective. Soc Sci Med 52:1433–1440PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
MacKenzie R, Chapman S, Holding S, Stiven A (2010) “No respecter of youth”: over-representation of young women in Australian television coverage of breast cancer. J Cancer Educ. doi:10.​1007/​s13187-010-0083-0
28.
Henderson L, Kitzinger J (1999) The human drama of genetics: ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ media representations of inherited breast cancer. Sociol Health Illn. doi:10.​1111/​1467-9566.​00173
29.
30.
31.
World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. AICR, Washington, DC
32.
33.
Newcomb PA, Wernli KJ (2010) Risk Factors. In: Sauter E, Daly M (eds) Breast cancer risk reduction and early detection. Springer, New York, pp 3–22CrossRef
34.
Rozema H, Vollink T, Lechner L (2009) The role of illness representations in coping and health of patients treated for breast cancer. Psychooncology. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1488 PubMed
35.
Oba S, Takatsuka N, Nagata C, Nagao Y, Yamamoto S, Shibuya C, Kashiki Y, Shimizu H (2009) Causal attributions to epidemiological risk factors and their associations to later psychological adjustment among Japanese breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-008-0446-9 PubMed
36.
37.
Stewart DE, Cheung AM, Duff S, Wong F, McQuestion M, Cheng T, Purdy L, Bunston T (2001) Attributions of cause and recurrence in long-term breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​497
38.
39.
De Ver Dye T, Bogale S, Hobden C, Tilahun Y, Hechter V, Deressa T, Bize M, Reeler A (2011) A mixed-method assessment of beliefs and practice around breast cancer in Ethiopia: implications for public health programming and cancer control. Glob Public Health. doi:10.​1080/​17441692.​2010.​510479
40.
Arman M, Backman M, Carlsson M, Hamrin E (2006) Women’s perceptions and beliefs about the genesis of their breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 29:142–148
41.
42.
Lavery JF, Clarke VA (1996) Causal attributions, coping strategies, and adjustment to breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 19:20–28PubMedCrossRef
43.
Lowery BJ, Jacobsen BS, Ducette J (1993) Causal attribution, control, and adjustment to breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 10:37–53CrossRef
44.
45.
46.
Timko C, Janoff-Bulman R (1985) Attributions, vulnerability, and psychological adjustment: the case of breast cancer. Health Psychol 4:521–544PubMedCrossRef
47.
Surtees PG, Wainwright NW, Luben RN, Khaw KT, Bingham SA (2010) No evidence that social stress is associated with breast cancer incidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-009-0454-6
48.
Michael YL, Carlson NE, Chlebowski RT, Aickin M, Weihs KL, Ockene JK, Bowen DJ, Ritenbaugh C (2009) Influence of stressors on breast cancer incidence in the Women’s Health Initiative. Health Psychol. doi:10.​1037/​a0012982 PubMedCentralPubMed
49.
50.
51.
52.
Ashing-Giwa KT, Padilla G, Tejero J, Kraemer J, Wright K, Coscarelli A, Clayton S, Williams I, Hills D (2004) Understanding the breast cancer experience of women: a qualitative study of African American, Asian American, Latina and Caucasian cancer survivors. Psychooncology. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​750
53.
54.
Karbani G, Lim JN, Hewison J, Atkin K, Horgan K, Lansdown M, Chu CE (2011) Culture, attitude and knowledge about breast cancer and preventive measures: a qualitative study of South Asian breast cancer patients in the UK. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12:1619–1626PubMed
55.
56.
Metadata
Title
What causes breast cancer? A systematic review of causal attributions among breast cancer survivors and how these compare to expert-endorsed risk factors
Authors
Jo Anne Dumalaon-Canaria
Amanda D. Hutchinson
Ivanka Prichard
Carlene Wilson
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0377-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2014

Cancer Causes & Control 7/2014 Go to the issue

Original paper

Occupational exposure and ovarian cancer risk

Original paper

Reproductive history and the risk of molecular breast cancer subtypes in a prospective study of Norwegian women

Original paper

Gene–environment interactions between JAZF1 and occupational and household lead exposure in prostate cancer among African American men

Original paper

Maternal and birth characteristics and childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group

Original paper

Associations between circulating 1,25(OH)2D concentration and odds of metachronous colorectal adenoma

Original paper

Plasma free 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, and risk of breast cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study II
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits