Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Cancer Causes & Control
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 11/2011

01-11-2011 | Original paper

What factors do cancer patients believe contribute to the development of their cancer? (New South Wales, Australia)

Authors: Simon J. Willcox, Bernard W. Stewart, Freddy Sitas

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 11/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To analyze Australian cancer patients’ beliefs about factors contributing to the development of their cancer.

Methods

As part of a case–control study (The Cancer Council NSW Cancer, Lifestyle and Evaluation of Risk Study), a total of 2,857 cancer patients (open to all types of cancer) were surveyed and via an open-ended question, were asked to specify factors they think contributed to the development of their cancer. Qualitative analysis and categorical techniques were used to analyze the data.

Results

About half, 53%, of patients specified at least one contributing factor. The odds of a person specifying a contributing factor increased with time period since diagnosis (p = 0.0006). Patients most frequently specified, respectively: “Stress” (15.4%), “Genetics/hereditary” (10.9%) and “Smoking” (6.2%). Among factors specified the largest proportion (24.1%) was perceived to be “Non-modifiable.”

Conclusion

Cancer patients specified a broad range of factors and agents to which their disease may be attributed. Some of these were poorly correlated with epidemiological rankings of attributable risk factors. The role of psychosocial and genetic factors was overstated. Misconceptions regarding the causes of cancer are a key consideration of health professionals when devising communication strategies around cancer prevention.
Literature
1.
Doyle C, Kushi LH, Byers T et al (2006) Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: an American Cancer Society guide for informed choices. CA Cancer J Clin 56:323–353PubMedCrossRef
2.
Doll R, Peto R (1981) The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates for avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. Oxford University Press, Oxford
3.
Colditz GA, Sellers TA, Trapido E (2006) Epidemiology–identifying the causes and preventability of cancer? Nat Rev Cancer 6:75–83PubMedCrossRef
4.
Redeker C, Wardle J, Wilder D, Hiom S, Miles A (2009) The launch of Cancer Research UK’s ‘Reduce the Risk’ campaign: baseline measurements of public awareness of risk factors in 2004. Eur J Cancer 45:827–836PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
Wold KS, Byers T, Crane LA, Ahnen D (2005) What do cancer survivors believe causes cancer? Cancer Causes Control 16:115–123PubMedCrossRef
7.
Costanzo ES, Lutgendorf SK, Bradley SL, Rose SL, Anderson B (2005) Cancer attributions, distress, and health practices among gynecologic cancer survivors. Psychosom Med 67:972–980PubMedCrossRef
8.
Kulik L, Kronfeld M (2005) Adjustment to breast cancer: the contribution of resources and causal attributions regarding the illness. Soc Work Health Care 41:37–57PubMedCrossRef
9.
Linn MW, Linn BS, Stein SR (1982) Beliefs about causes of cancer in cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 16:835–839PubMedCrossRef
10.
Maskarinek G, Gotay CC, Tatsumura Y, Shumay DM, Kakai H (2000) Perceived cancer causes: use of complementary and alternative therapy. Cancer Pract 9(4):183–189CrossRef
11.
Salander P (2007) Attributions of lung cancer: my own illness is hardly caused by smoking. Psychooncology 16:587–592PubMedCrossRef
12.
Lehto RH (2007) Causal attributions in individuals with suspected lung cancer: relationships to illness coherence and emotional responses. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 13:109–115CrossRef
13.
Perez-Stable EJ, Sabogal F, Otero-Sabagal R, Hiatt RA, McPhee SJ (1992) Misconceptions about cancer among Latinos and Anglos. JAMA 268:3219–3223PubMedCrossRef
14.
Garcia M, Fernandez E, Borras JM et al (2005) Cancer risk perceptions in an urban mediterranean population. Int J Cancer 117:132–136PubMedCrossRef
15.
Inoue M, Iwasaki M, Otani T, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S (2006) Public awareness of risk factors for cancer among the Japanese general population: a population-based survey. BMC Public Health 6:2PubMedCrossRef
16.
Starr G, Langley A, Taylor A (2000) Environmental health risk perception in Australia. Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra
17.
Wang C, Miller SM, Egleston BL, Hay JL, Weinberg DS (2010) Beliefs about the causes of breast and colorectal cancer among women in the general population. Cancer Causes Control 21:99–107PubMedCrossRef
18.
Lipworth WL, Davey HM, Carter SM, Hooker C, Hu W (2010) Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people’s understandings of cancer risk? Health Expect 13:113–124PubMedCrossRef
19.
Stewart B (2008) Banding carcinogenic risks in developed countries: a procedural basis for qualitative assessment. Mutat Res 658:124–151PubMedCrossRef
20.
Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California
21.
SAS Institute Inc (2008) Statistical analysis software (SAS) [computer program]. Microsoft windows version 9.2, March 2008. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc
22.
Stewart BW, Kleihues P (Eds) (2003) World cancer report. IARC Press
23.
Segerstrom S, Miller G (2004) Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychol Bull 130(4):601–630PubMedCrossRef
24.
Garssen B (2004) Psychological factors and cancer development: evidence after 30 years of research. Clin Psychol Rev 24(3):315–338PubMedCrossRef
25.
Reiche EM, Nunes SO, Morimoto HK (2004) Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer. Lancet Oncol 5(10):617–625PubMedCrossRef
26.
Thewes B, Butow P, Girgis A, Pendlebury S (2004) The psychosocial needs of breast cancer survivors; a qualitative study of the shared and unique needs of younger versus older survivors. Psychooncology 13(3):177–189PubMedCrossRef
27.
Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK et al (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer. New Engl J Med 343:78–85PubMedCrossRef
28.
World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. AICR, Washington DC
29.
30.
Stewart D, Cheung A, Duff S et al (2001) Attributions of cause and recurrence in long-term breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 10:179–183PubMedCrossRef
31.
Faller H, Schilling S, Lang H (1995) Causal attribution and adaptation among lung cancer patients. J Psychosom Res 39:619–627PubMedCrossRef
32.
Kelley H (1973) The Processes of causal attribution. Am Psychol 28(2):107–128
33.
Schwarzer R (1994) Optimism, vulnerability, and self-beliefs as health-related cognitions: A systematic overview. Psychol Health 9(3):161–180CrossRef
34.
Weinstein ND (1984) Why it won’t happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychol 3(5):431–457PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
What factors do cancer patients believe contribute to the development of their cancer? (New South Wales, Australia)
Authors
Simon J. Willcox
Bernard W. Stewart
Freddy Sitas
Publication date
01-11-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 11/2011
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-011-9824-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2011

Cancer Causes & Control 11/2011 Go to the issue

Original paper

Paternal occupational exposure to pesticides and risk of neuroblastoma among children: a meta-analysis

Original paper

Parental occupational exposure to exhausts, solvents, glues and paints, and risk of childhood leukemia

Original paper

Associations of pregnancy characteristics with maternal and cord steroid hormones, angiogenic factors, and insulin-like growth factor axis

Brief report

Insulin-like growth factor-I and C-reactive protein during pregnancy and maternal risk of non-epithelial ovarian cancer: a nested case–control study

Original paper

A case–control study of reproductive factors and renal cell carcinoma among black and white women in the United States

Original paper

Social and clinical predictors of prostate cancer treatment decisions among men in South Carolina
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits