Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 9/2007

01-11-2007 | Original Paper

Prostate cancer mortality in relation to screening by prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination: a population-based study in middle-aged men

Authors: Ilir Agalliu, Noel S. Weiss, Daniel W. Lin, Janet L. Stanford

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 9/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although prostate cancer screening by measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) is common in clinical practice, the impact of such screening on prostate cancer-specific mortality remains uncertain.

Methods

Data from a population-based case–control study in King County, Washington, among men aged 50–64 years (706 cases, 645 controls) were used to examine the relationships between PSA and DRE screening and fatal prostate cancer and other-cause mortality. Incident cases were diagnosed in 1993–1996, identified via the Seattle-Puget Sound SEER cancer registry and followed for vital status through 1 June 2007. Controls were ascertained by random digit dialing and frequency age-matched to cases. The screening variable used in this analysis was self-reported receipt of one or more PSA and/or DRE tests performed as part of a routine checkup in the five-year period before diagnosis or reference date.

Results

A smaller proportion of men with fatal prostate cancer had one or more PSA and/or DRE screening tests compared to controls, resulting in an adjusted odds ratios (OR) of 0.38 (95% CI 0.19–0.77). There was no association, however, between PSA and/or DRE screening and other-cause mortality (OR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.51–2.02).

Conclusions

Results of this study suggest a reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality associated with PSA and/or DRE screening in middle-aged men. Findings should be interpreted cautiously, however, as results are based on observational data. Further, the study was not able to separate the relative efficacy of PSA versus DRE screening.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer Facts and Figures American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer Facts and Figures
2.
go back to reference De Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Berenguer Sanchez A, Calais da Silva F, Ciatto S et al (2002) Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer 97:237–244PubMedCrossRef De Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Berenguer Sanchez A, Calais da Silva F, Ciatto S et al (2002) Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer 97:237–244PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Andriole GL, Levin DL, Crawford ED, Gelmann EP, Pinsky PF et al (2005) Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 433–438PubMedCrossRef Andriole GL, Levin DL, Crawford ED, Gelmann EP, Pinsky PF et al (2005) Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 433–438PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV (1991) Case–control study of screening for prostate cancer by digital rectal examination. Lancet 337:1526–1529PubMedCrossRef Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV (1991) Case–control study of screening for prostate cancer by digital rectal examination. Lancet 337:1526–1529PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jacobsen SJ, Bergstralh EJ, Katusic SK, Guess HA, Darby CH, Silverstein MD, Oesterling JE, Lieber MM (1998) Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a population-based case–control study. Urology 52:173–179PubMedCrossRef Jacobsen SJ, Bergstralh EJ, Katusic SK, Guess HA, Darby CH, Silverstein MD, Oesterling JE, Lieber MM (1998) Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a population-based case–control study. Urology 52:173–179PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Richert-Boe KE, Humphrey LL, Glass AG, Weiss NS (1998) Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a case–control study. J Med Screen 5:99–103PubMed Richert-Boe KE, Humphrey LL, Glass AG, Weiss NS (1998) Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a case–control study. J Med Screen 5:99–103PubMed
7.
go back to reference Perron L, Moore L, Bairati I, Bernard PM, Meyer F (2002) PSA screening and prostate cancer mortality. CMAJ 166:586–591PubMed Perron L, Moore L, Bairati I, Bernard PM, Meyer F (2002) PSA screening and prostate cancer mortality. CMAJ 166:586–591PubMed
8.
go back to reference Weinmann S, Richert-Boe KE, Glass AG, Weiss NS (2004) Prostate cancer screening and mortality: a case–control study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 14:133–138CrossRef Weinmann S, Richert-Boe KE, Glass AG, Weiss NS (2004) Prostate cancer screening and mortality: a case–control study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 14:133–138CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Weinmann S, Richert-Boe KE, Van Den Eeden SK, Enger SM, Rybicki BA, Shapiro JA, Weiss NS (2005) Screening by prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in relation to prostate cancer mortality: a case–control study. Epidemiology 16:367–376PubMedCrossRef Weinmann S, Richert-Boe KE, Van Den Eeden SK, Enger SM, Rybicki BA, Shapiro JA, Weiss NS (2005) Screening by prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in relation to prostate cancer mortality: a case–control study. Epidemiology 16:367–376PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kopec JA, Goel V, Bunting PS, Neuman J, Sayre EC, Warde P, Levers P, Fleshner N (2005) Screening with prostate specific antigen and metastatic prostate cancer risk: a population based case–control study. J Urol 174:495–449PubMedCrossRef Kopec JA, Goel V, Bunting PS, Neuman J, Sayre EC, Warde P, Levers P, Fleshner N (2005) Screening with prostate specific antigen and metastatic prostate cancer risk: a population based case–control study. J Urol 174:495–449PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bartsch G, Horninger W, Klocker H, Reissigl A, Oberaigner W, Schonitzer D, Severi G, Robertson C, Boyle P (2001) Tyrol Prostate Cancer Screening Group. Prostate cancer mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria. Urology 58:417–424 Bartsch G, Horninger W, Klocker H, Reissigl A, Oberaigner W, Schonitzer D, Severi G, Robertson C, Boyle P (2001) Tyrol Prostate Cancer Screening Group. Prostate cancer mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria. Urology 58:417–424
12.
go back to reference Horninger W, Berger A, Pelzer A, Klocker H, Oberaigner W, Schonitzer D, Severi G, Robertson C, Boyle P, Bartsch G (2005) Screening for prostate cancer: updated experience from the Tyrol study. Can J Urol 12(Suppl 1):7–13PubMed Horninger W, Berger A, Pelzer A, Klocker H, Oberaigner W, Schonitzer D, Severi G, Robertson C, Boyle P, Bartsch G (2005) Screening for prostate cancer: updated experience from the Tyrol study. Can J Urol 12(Suppl 1):7–13PubMed
13.
go back to reference Oberaigner W, Horninger W, Klocker H, Schonitzer D, Stuhlinger W, Bartsch G (2006) Reduction of prostate cancer mortality in Tyrol, Austria, after introduction of prostate-specific antigen testing. Am J Epidemiol 164:376–384PubMedCrossRef Oberaigner W, Horninger W, Klocker H, Schonitzer D, Stuhlinger W, Bartsch G (2006) Reduction of prostate cancer mortality in Tyrol, Austria, after introduction of prostate-specific antigen testing. Am J Epidemiol 164:376–384PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Concato J, Wells CK, Horwitz RI, Penson D, Fincke G, Berlowitz DR, Froehlich G, Blake D, Vickers MA, Gehr GA, Raheb NH, Sullivan G, Peduzzi P (2006) The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case–control study. Arch Intern Med 166:38–43PubMedCrossRef Concato J, Wells CK, Horwitz RI, Penson D, Fincke G, Berlowitz DR, Froehlich G, Blake D, Vickers MA, Gehr GA, Raheb NH, Sullivan G, Peduzzi P (2006) The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case–control study. Arch Intern Med 166:38–43PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Labrie F, Candas B, Dupont A, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Suburu RE, Diamond P, Levesque J, Belanger A (1999) Screening decreases prostate cancer death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 38:83–91PubMedCrossRef Labrie F, Candas B, Dupont A, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Suburu RE, Diamond P, Levesque J, Belanger A (1999) Screening decreases prostate cancer death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 38:83–91PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Labrie F, Candas B, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Belanger A, Brousseau G, Chevrette E, Levesque J (2004) Screening decreases prostate cancer mortality: 11-year follow-up of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 59:311–388PubMedCrossRef Labrie F, Candas B, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Belanger A, Brousseau G, Chevrette E, Levesque J (2004) Screening decreases prostate cancer mortality: 11-year follow-up of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 59:311–388PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sandblom G, Varenhorst E, Lofman O, Rosell J, Carlsson P (2004) Clinical consequences of screening for prostate cancer: 15 years follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in Sweden. Eur Urol 46:717–723; discussion 724PubMedCrossRef Sandblom G, Varenhorst E, Lofman O, Rosell J, Carlsson P (2004) Clinical consequences of screening for prostate cancer: 15 years follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in Sweden. Eur Urol 46:717–723; discussion 724PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schroder FH, Roobol MJ, Damhuis RA, de Koning HJ, Blijenberg BG, Van der Kwast TH, Kirkels WJ, Bangma CH (2005) Rotterdam randomized pilot studies of screening for prostate cancer—an overview after 10 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:696PubMedCrossRef Schroder FH, Roobol MJ, Damhuis RA, de Koning HJ, Blijenberg BG, Van der Kwast TH, Kirkels WJ, Bangma CH (2005) Rotterdam randomized pilot studies of screening for prostate cancer—an overview after 10 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:696PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ciatto S, Gervasi G, Gorini G, Lombardi C, Zappa M, Crocetti E (2006) Prostate cancer specific mortality in the florence screening pilot study cohort 1992–1993. Eur J Cancer 42:1858–1862PubMedCrossRef Ciatto S, Gervasi G, Gorini G, Lombardi C, Zappa M, Crocetti E (2006) Prostate cancer specific mortality in the florence screening pilot study cohort 1992–1993. Eur J Cancer 42:1858–1862PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stanford JL, Wicklund KG, McKnight B, Daling JR, Brawer MK (1999) Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:881–886PubMed Stanford JL, Wicklund KG, McKnight B, Daling JR, Brawer MK (1999) Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:881–886PubMed
21.
go back to reference Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research, Volume 1. The analysis of case–control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research, Volume 1. The analysis of case–control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
22.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ (2005) American cancer society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55:31–44PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ (2005) American cancer society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55:31–44PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Weiss NS (1994) Application of the case–control method in the evaluation of screening. Am J Epidemiology 16:102–108 Weiss NS (1994) Application of the case–control method in the evaluation of screening. Am J Epidemiology 16:102–108
24.
go back to reference Weiss NS, Etzioni R (2002) Estimating the influence of rescreening interval on the benefits associated with cancer screening: approaches and limitation. Epidemiology 13:713–717PubMedCrossRef Weiss NS, Etzioni R (2002) Estimating the influence of rescreening interval on the benefits associated with cancer screening: approaches and limitation. Epidemiology 13:713–717PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Weiss NS, Lazovich DA (1996) Case–control studies of screening efficacy: the use of persons newly diagnosed with cancer who later sustain an unfavorable outcome. Am J Epidemiol 143:319–322PubMed Weiss NS, Lazovich DA (1996) Case–control studies of screening efficacy: the use of persons newly diagnosed with cancer who later sustain an unfavorable outcome. Am J Epidemiol 143:319–322PubMed
Metadata
Title
Prostate cancer mortality in relation to screening by prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination: a population-based study in middle-aged men
Authors
Ilir Agalliu
Noel S. Weiss
Daniel W. Lin
Janet L. Stanford
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 9/2007
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-007-9031-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2007

Cancer Causes & Control 9/2007 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine