Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018

Open Access 01-06-2018 | Epidemiology

A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time

Authors: Mikael Eriksson, Jingmei Li, Karin Leifland, Kamila Czene, Per Hall

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mammographic density is a marker of breast cancer risk and diagnostics accuracy. Density change over time is a strong proxy for response to endocrine treatment and potentially a stronger predictor of breast cancer incidence. We developed STRATUS to analyse digital and analogue images and enable automated measurements of density changes over time.

Method

Raw and processed images from the same mammogram were randomly sampled from 41,353 healthy women. Measurements from raw images (using FDA approved software iCAD) were used as templates for STRATUS to measure density on processed images through machine learning. A similar two-step design was used to train density measures in analogue images. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated in three unique datasets. An alignment protocol was developed using images from 11,409 women to reduce non-biological variability in density change. The protocol was evaluated in 55,073 women having two regular mammography screens. Differences and variances in densities were compared before and after image alignment.

Results

The average relative risk of breast cancer in the three datasets was 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–1.8] per standard deviation of percent mammographic density. The discrimination was AUC 0.62 (CI 0.60–0.64). The type of image did not significantly influence the risk associations. Alignment decreased the non-biological variability in density change and re-estimated the yearly overall percent density decrease from 1.5 to 0.9%, p < 0.001.

Conclusions

The quality of STRATUS density measures was not influenced by mammogram type. The alignment protocol reduced the non-biological variability between images over time. STRATUS has the potential to become a useful tool for epidemiological studies and clinical follow-up.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(9):670–675CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(9):670–675CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Solomon SR, Sawilowsky SS (2009) Impact of rank-based normalizing transformations on the accuracy of test scores. J Modern Appl Stat Methods 8(2):448–462CrossRef Solomon SR, Sawilowsky SS (2009) Impact of rank-based normalizing transformations on the accuracy of test scores. J Modern Appl Stat Methods 8(2):448–462CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Levenberg Kenneth (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 2:164–168CrossRef Levenberg Kenneth (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 2:164–168CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I (ed) Contributions to probability and statistics; essays in honor of Harold hotelling. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 278–292 Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I (ed) Contributions to probability and statistics; essays in honor of Harold hotelling. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 278–292
21.
go back to reference Student [William Sealy Gosset] (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6:1 Student [William Sealy Gosset] (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6:1
24.
go back to reference Hussain Z, Roberts N (1999) Estimation of breast volume and its variation during the menstrual cycle using MRI and stereology. Br J Radiol 72(855):236–245CrossRefPubMed Hussain Z, Roberts N (1999) Estimation of breast volume and its variation during the menstrual cycle using MRI and stereology. Br J Radiol 72(855):236–245CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Chan S, Su MY et al (2011) Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in breast density measured by using three-dimensional MR imaging. Radiology 261(3):744–751CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chan S, Su MY et al (2011) Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in breast density measured by using three-dimensional MR imaging. Radiology 261(3):744–751CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Iversen A, Frydenberg H et al (2016) Cyclic endogenous estrogen and progesterone vary by mammographic density phenotypes in premenopausal women. Eur J Cancer Prev 25(1):9–18CrossRefPubMed Iversen A, Frydenberg H et al (2016) Cyclic endogenous estrogen and progesterone vary by mammographic density phenotypes in premenopausal women. Eur J Cancer Prev 25(1):9–18CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hovhannisyan G, Chow L et al (2009) Differences in measured mammographic density in the menstrual cycle. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(7):1993–1999CrossRef Hovhannisyan G, Chow L et al (2009) Differences in measured mammographic density in the menstrual cycle. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(7):1993–1999CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Thévenaz P, Ruttimann UE, Unser M (1998) A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans Image Process 7(1):27–41CrossRefPubMed Thévenaz P, Ruttimann UE, Unser M (1998) A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans Image Process 7(1):27–41CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time
Authors
Mikael Eriksson
Jingmei Li
Karin Leifland
Kamila Czene
Per Hall
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine