Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2011

01-06-2011 | Clinical trial

Women’s interest in taking tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: response to a tailored decision aid

Authors: Angela Fagerlin, Amanda J. Dillard, Dylan M. Smith, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, Rosemarie Pitsch, Jennifer B. McClure, Sarah Greene, Sharon Hensley Alford, Vijayan Nair, Daniel F. Hayes, Cheryl Wiese, Peter A. Ubel

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Although tamoxifen can prevent primary breast cancer, few women use it as a preventive measure. A second option, raloxifene, has recently been approved. The objective of the study was to determine women’s interest in tamoxifen and raloxifene after reading a decision aid (DA) describing the risks and benefits of each medication. Women with 5-year risk of breast cancer ≥ 1.66 from two large health maintenance organizations were randomized to receive a DA versus usual care. After reading an on-line DA that discussed the risks and benefits of tamoxifen and raloxifene, women completed measures of risk perception, decisional conflict, behavioral intentions, and actual behavior related to tamoxifen and raloxifene. 3 months following the intervention, 8.1% of participants had looked for additional information about breast cancer prevention drugs, and 1.8% had talked to their doctor about tamoxifen and/or raloxifene. The majority, 54.7%, had decided to not take either drug, 0.5% had started raloxifene, and none had started tamoxifen. Participants were not particularly worried about taking tamoxifen or raloxifene and did not perceive significant benefits from taking these drugs. Over 50% did not perceive a change in their risk of getting breast cancer if they took tamoxifen or raloxifene. After reading a DA about tamoxifen and raloxifene, few women were interested in taking either breast cancer prevention drug.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Port ER, Montgomery LL, Heerdt AS, Borgen PI (2001) Patient reluctance toward tamoxifen use for breast cancer primary prevention. Ann Surg Oncol 8(7):580–585PubMedCrossRef Port ER, Montgomery LL, Heerdt AS, Borgen PI (2001) Patient reluctance toward tamoxifen use for breast cancer primary prevention. Ann Surg Oncol 8(7):580–585PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stacey D, O’Connor A, De Grasse C, Verma S (2003) Development and evaluation of a breast cancer prevention decision aid for higher risk women. Health Expect 6(1):3–18PubMedCrossRef Stacey D, O’Connor A, De Grasse C, Verma S (2003) Development and evaluation of a breast cancer prevention decision aid for higher risk women. Health Expect 6(1):3–18PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bober S, Hoke L, Duda R, Regan M, Tung N (2004) Decision-making about tamoxifen in women at high risk for breast cancer: clinical and psychological factors. J Clin Oncol 22(24):4951–4957PubMedCrossRef Bober S, Hoke L, Duda R, Regan M, Tung N (2004) Decision-making about tamoxifen in women at high risk for breast cancer: clinical and psychological factors. J Clin Oncol 22(24):4951–4957PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Waters EA, Cronin KA, Graubard BI, Han PK, Freedman AN (2010) Prevalence of tamoxifen use for breast cancer chemoprevention among U. S. women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:443PubMedCrossRef Waters EA, Cronin KA, Graubard BI, Han PK, Freedman AN (2010) Prevalence of tamoxifen use for breast cancer chemoprevention among U. S. women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:443PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Melnikow J, Paterniti D, Azari R, Kuenneth C, Birch S, Kuppermann M, Nuovo J, Keyzer J, Henderson S (2005) Preferences of women evaluating risks of tamoxifen (POWER) study of preferences for tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction. Cancer 103(10):1996–2005PubMedCrossRef Melnikow J, Paterniti D, Azari R, Kuenneth C, Birch S, Kuppermann M, Nuovo J, Keyzer J, Henderson S (2005) Preferences of women evaluating risks of tamoxifen (POWER) study of preferences for tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction. Cancer 103(10):1996–2005PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stacey D, O’Connor AM, De Grasse C, Verma S (2003) Development and evaluation of a breast cancer prevention decision aid for higher-risk women. Health Expect 6:3–18PubMedCrossRef Stacey D, O’Connor AM, De Grasse C, Verma S (2003) Development and evaluation of a breast cancer prevention decision aid for higher-risk women. Health Expect 6:3–18PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher B, Smith D, Nair V, Derry H, McClure J, Greene S, Stark A, Alford S, Lantz P et al (2010) Women’s decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:613–620PubMedCrossRef Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher B, Smith D, Nair V, Derry H, McClure J, Greene S, Stark A, Alford S, Lantz P et al (2010) Women’s decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:613–620PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Salant T, Ganschow PS, Olopade OI, Lauderdale DS (2006) “Why take it if you don’t have anything?” Breast cancer risk perceptions and prevention choices at a public hospital. J Gen Intern Med 21:779–785PubMedCrossRef Salant T, Ganschow PS, Olopade OI, Lauderdale DS (2006) “Why take it if you don’t have anything?” Breast cancer risk perceptions and prevention choices at a public hospital. J Gen Intern Med 21:779–785PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Snyder C, Seidel J, Hanna D, Lynch HT, Narod S (2005) The use of preventative measures among healthy women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Familial Cancer 4:97–103PubMedCrossRef Metcalfe KA, Snyder C, Seidel J, Hanna D, Lynch HT, Narod S (2005) The use of preventative measures among healthy women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Familial Cancer 4:97–103PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vogel V, Constantino J, Wickerman D et al (2006) Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes; the NSABP study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial. JAMA 295(23):2727–2741PubMedCrossRef Vogel V, Constantino J, Wickerman D et al (2006) Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes; the NSABP study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial. JAMA 295(23):2727–2741PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Donovan R, Jalleh G, Jones S (2003) The word ‘cancer’: reframing the context to reduce anxiety arousal. Aust N Z J Public Health 27(3):291–293PubMedCrossRef Donovan R, Jalleh G, Jones S (2003) The word ‘cancer’: reframing the context to reduce anxiety arousal. Aust N Z J Public Health 27(3):291–293PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA, Shafir E (1995) Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. J Am Med Assoc 273(4):302–305CrossRef Redelmeier DA, Shafir E (1995) Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. J Am Med Assoc 273(4):302–305CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(24):1879–1886PubMedCrossRef Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(24):1879–1886PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J et al (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(18):1371–1388PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J et al (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(18):1371–1388PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference O’Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 15(1):25–30CrossRef O’Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 15(1):25–30CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM (2007) Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the subjective numeracy scale. Med Decis Mak 27(5):672–680CrossRef Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM (2007) Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the subjective numeracy scale. Med Decis Mak 27(5):672–680CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A (2007) Validation of the subjective numeracy scale (SNS): effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med Decis Mak 27(5):663–671CrossRef Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A (2007) Validation of the subjective numeracy scale (SNS): effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med Decis Mak 27(5):663–671CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (1982) The need for cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol 42:116–131CrossRef Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (1982) The need for cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol 42:116–131CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Neuberg SL, Newsome JT (1993) Personal need for structure: individual differences in the desire for simple structure. J Pers Soc Psychol 65(1):113–131CrossRef Neuberg SL, Newsome JT (1993) Personal need for structure: individual differences in the desire for simple structure. J Pers Soc Psychol 65(1):113–131CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Meiser B, Butow P, Friedlander M, Schnieden V, Gattas M, Kirk J, Suthers G, Haan E, Tucker K (2000) Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18(11):2250–2257PubMed Meiser B, Butow P, Friedlander M, Schnieden V, Gattas M, Kirk J, Suthers G, Haan E, Tucker K (2000) Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18(11):2250–2257PubMed
Metadata
Title
Women’s interest in taking tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: response to a tailored decision aid
Authors
Angela Fagerlin
Amanda J. Dillard
Dylan M. Smith
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
Rosemarie Pitsch
Jennifer B. McClure
Sarah Greene
Sharon Hensley Alford
Vijayan Nair
Daniel F. Hayes
Cheryl Wiese
Peter A. Ubel
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1450-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine