Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2008

01-10-2008 | Epidemiology

Surveillance mammography and the risk of death among elderly breast cancer patients

Authors: Mario Schootman, Donna B. Jeffe, Min Lian, Rebecca Aft, William E. Gillanders

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose To examine the benefits of mammography for elderly breast cancer survivors in community settings. Methods Using the 1991–1999 linked SEER-Medicare data, we examined if mammography reduced the risk of breast-cancer-specific and all-cause mortality among women age 66 or older who were diagnosed with first primary breast cancer (FPBC) at stages 0–III and survived at least 30 months. To analyze the influence of mammography (both within one year and within two years prior to death/censoring) on the risk of breast-cancer-specific mortality, we compared women who died of breast cancer (cases) with women who died of other causes or were censored (controls). For an analysis of all-cause mortality, we compared women who died from any cause (cases) with women who were censored (controls). Propensity scores were used to adjust for tumor-related, treatment-related, and sociodemographic confounders. Results Among 1351 breast cancer deaths (cases) and 5,262 controls, women who had a mammogram during a one or two-year time interval were less likely to die from breast cancer than women who did not have any mammograms during this time period in propensity-score-adjusted analysis (within one year odds ratio [OR]: 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–0.95; within two years OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70–0.92). Similarly, risk of all-cause mortality was reduced among women who had mammograms during one- or two-year intervals. Conclusions In community settings, mammography use during a one- or two-year time interval was associated with a small-reduced risk of breast-cancer-specific and all-cause mortality among elderly breast cancer survivors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(17):1784–1792PubMedCrossRef Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(17):1784–1792PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW (2005) Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 293(10):1245–1256PubMedCrossRef Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW (2005) Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 293(10):1245–1256PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference McCarthy E, Burns R, Freund K et al (2000) Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(10):1226–1266PubMed McCarthy E, Burns R, Freund K et al (2000) Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(10):1226–1266PubMed
4.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Gebretsadik T, Newman J (2000) Is screening mammography effective in elderly women? Am J Med 108(2):112–119PubMedCrossRef Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Gebretsadik T, Newman J (2000) Is screening mammography effective in elderly women? Am J Med 108(2):112–119PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fletcher SW, Elmore JG (2003) Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348(17):1672–1680PubMedCrossRef Fletcher SW, Elmore JG (2003) Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348(17):1672–1680PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Walter LC, Lewis CL, Barton MB (2005) Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: A review of the evidence. Am J Med 118(10):1078–1086PubMedCrossRef Walter LC, Lewis CL, Barton MB (2005) Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: A review of the evidence. Am J Med 118(10):1078–1086PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, Noorani H, McGahan L et al (2002) Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review. The Breast 11(3):228–235PubMedCrossRef Grunfeld E, Noorani H, McGahan L et al (2002) Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review. The Breast 11(3):228–235PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lash TL, Fox MP, Buist DSM et al (2007) Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 25:3001–3006PubMedCrossRef Lash TL, Fox MP, Buist DSM et al (2007) Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 25:3001–3006PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kaas R, Hart AA, Besnard AP, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ (2001) Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer. Br J Surg 88(1):123–127PubMedCrossRef Kaas R, Hart AA, Besnard AP, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ (2001) Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer. Br J Surg 88(1):123–127PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Davidson NE, Schapira DV et al (1999) American society of clinical oncology 1998 update of recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol 17(3):1080PubMed Smith TJ, Davidson NE, Schapira DV et al (1999) American society of clinical oncology 1998 update of recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol 17(3):1080PubMed
12.
go back to reference Temple LKF, Wang EEL, McLeod RS (1999) Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. CMAJ 161(8):1001–1008PubMed Temple LKF, Wang EEL, McLeod RS (1999) Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. CMAJ 161(8):1001–1008PubMed
15.
go back to reference Butler Nattinger A, Schapira MM, Warren JL, Earle CC (2002) Methodological issues in the use of administrative claims data to study surveillance after cancer treatment. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-69–74 Butler Nattinger A, Schapira MM, Warren JL, Earle CC (2002) Methodological issues in the use of administrative claims data to study surveillance after cancer treatment. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-69–74
16.
go back to reference Schapira MM, McAuliffe TL, Nattinger AB (2000) Underutilization of mammography in older breast cancer survivors. Med Care 38(3):281–289PubMedCrossRef Schapira MM, McAuliffe TL, Nattinger AB (2000) Underutilization of mammography in older breast cancer survivors. Med Care 38(3):281–289PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Black WC, Haggstrom DA, Gilbert Welch H (2002) All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(3):167–173PubMed Black WC, Haggstrom DA, Gilbert Welch H (2002) All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(3):167–173PubMed
18.
go back to reference Alibhai SMH (2006) Cancer screening: the importance of outcome measures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 57(3):215–224PubMedCrossRef Alibhai SMH (2006) Cancer screening: the importance of outcome measures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 57(3):215–224PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Blustein J (1995) Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women. N Engl J Med 332:1138–1143PubMedCrossRef Blustein J (1995) Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women. N Engl J Med 332:1138–1143PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference May DS, Trontell AE (1998) Mammography use by elderly women: a methodological comparison of two national data sources. Ann Epidemiol 8(7):439–444PubMedCrossRef May DS, Trontell AE (1998) Mammography use by elderly women: a methodological comparison of two national data sources. Ann Epidemiol 8(7):439–444PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Randolph WM, Mahnken JD, Goodwin JS, Freeman JL (2002) Using medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms. Health Serv Res 37(6):1643–1657PubMedCrossRef Randolph WM, Mahnken JD, Goodwin JS, Freeman JL (2002) Using medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms. Health Serv Res 37(6):1643–1657PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Randolph WM, Goodwin JS, Mahnken JD, Freeman JL (2002) Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Intern Med 137(10):783–790PubMed Randolph WM, Goodwin JS, Mahnken JD, Freeman JL (2002) Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Intern Med 137(10):783–790PubMed
23.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Schultz L, Simpkins J, Lafata JE (2007) The utility of administrative data for measuring adherence to cancer surveillance care guidelines. Med Care 45(1):66–72PubMedCrossRef Cooper GS, Schultz L, Simpkins J, Lafata JE (2007) The utility of administrative data for measuring adherence to cancer surveillance care guidelines. Med Care 45(1):66–72PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619PubMedCrossRef Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A et al (2002) Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-55–61 Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A et al (2002) Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-55–61
27.
go back to reference Du X, Goodwin JS (2001) Increase of chemotherapy use in older women with breast carcinoma from 1991 to 1996. Cancer 92:730–737PubMedCrossRef Du X, Goodwin JS (2001) Increase of chemotherapy use in older women with breast carcinoma from 1991 to 1996. Cancer 92:730–737PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Culler SD, Parchman ML, Przybylski M (1998) Factors related to potentially preventable hospitalizations among the elderly. Med Care 36(6):804–817PubMedCrossRef Culler SD, Parchman ML, Przybylski M (1998) Factors related to potentially preventable hospitalizations among the elderly. Med Care 36(6):804–817PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Parchman ML, Culler SD (1999) Preventable hospitalizations in primary care shortage area. An analysis of vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Fam Med 8:487–491PubMedCrossRef Parchman ML, Culler SD (1999) Preventable hospitalizations in primary care shortage area. An analysis of vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Fam Med 8:487–491PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM (1992) Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA 268(17):2388–2394PubMedCrossRef Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM (1992) Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA 268(17):2388–2394PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Earle CC, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Weeks JC (2003) Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 21(8):1447–1451PubMedCrossRef Earle CC, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Weeks JC (2003) Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 21(8):1447–1451PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rao S, Kubisiak J, Gilden D (2004) Cost of illness associated with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 83(1):25–32PubMedCrossRef Rao S, Kubisiak J, Gilden D (2004) Cost of illness associated with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 83(1):25–32PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Rosenbaum P (2002) Observational studies, 2nd edn. Springer, New York Rosenbaum P (2002) Observational studies, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
34.
go back to reference Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127(8 Pt 2):757–763PubMed Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127(8 Pt 2):757–763PubMed
35.
go back to reference Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49(12):1373–1379PubMedCrossRef Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49(12):1373–1379PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17(19):2265–2281PubMedCrossRef D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17(19):2265–2281PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Sturmer T (2006) Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol 163(12):1149–1156PubMedCrossRef Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Sturmer T (2006) Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol 163(12):1149–1156PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Weitzen S, Lapane KL, Toledano AY, Hume AL, Mor V (2004) Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 13:841–853PubMedCrossRef Weitzen S, Lapane KL, Toledano AY, Hume AL, Mor V (2004) Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 13:841–853PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Weitzen S, Lapane KL, Toledano AY, Hume AL, Mor V (2005) Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: The case of the omitted confounder. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 14(4):227–238PubMedCrossRef Weitzen S, Lapane KL, Toledano AY, Hume AL, Mor V (2005) Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: The case of the omitted confounder. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 14(4):227–238PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Mandelblatt J, Saha S, Teutsch S et al (2003) The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 139(10):835–842PubMed Mandelblatt J, Saha S, Teutsch S et al (2003) The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 139(10):835–842PubMed
41.
go back to reference White E, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2004) Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(24):1832–1839PubMed White E, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2004) Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(24):1832–1839PubMed
42.
go back to reference Lash TL, Clough-Gorr K, Silliman RA (2005) Reduced rates of cancer-related worries and mortality associated with guideline surveillance after breast cancer therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89(1):61–67PubMedCrossRef Lash TL, Clough-Gorr K, Silliman RA (2005) Reduced rates of cancer-related worries and mortality associated with guideline surveillance after breast cancer therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89(1):61–67PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Mandelblatt JS, Lawrence WF, Cullen J et al (2006) Patterns of care in early-stage breast cancer survivors in the first year after cessation of active treatment. J Clin Oncol 24(1):77–84PubMedCrossRef Mandelblatt JS, Lawrence WF, Cullen J et al (2006) Patterns of care in early-stage breast cancer survivors in the first year after cessation of active treatment. J Clin Oncol 24(1):77–84PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Harris R (2005) Effectiveness: the next question for breast cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(14):1021–1023PubMedCrossRef Harris R (2005) Effectiveness: the next question for breast cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(14):1021–1023PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Hillner BE, Mandelblatt J (2006) Caring for older women with breast cancer: can observational research fill the clinical trial gap? J Natl Cancer Inst 98(10):660–661PubMed Hillner BE, Mandelblatt J (2006) Caring for older women with breast cancer: can observational research fill the clinical trial gap? J Natl Cancer Inst 98(10):660–661PubMed
46.
go back to reference Brown ML, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG (1995) Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165(6):1373–1377PubMed Brown ML, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG (1995) Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165(6):1373–1377PubMed
47.
go back to reference Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH (2002) Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137(5 Part 1):347–360PubMed Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH (2002) Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137(5 Part 1):347–360PubMed
Metadata
Title
Surveillance mammography and the risk of death among elderly breast cancer patients
Authors
Mario Schootman
Donna B. Jeffe
Min Lian
Rebecca Aft
William E. Gillanders
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9795-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine