Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2008

01-10-2008 | Review

Mammographic features of triple receptor-negative primary breast cancers in young premenopausal women

Authors: Wei-Tse Yang, Mark Dryden, Kristine Broglio, Michael Gilcrease, Shaheenah Dawood, Peter J. Dempsey, Vicente Valero, Gabriel Hortobagyi, Deann Atchley, Banu Arun

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background The mammographic features of triple receptor-negative [TRN] breast cancers, a distinct cancer subtype with a poor prognosis have not been reported to our knowledge. The aim of this study was to compare the mammographic breast density, visibility, and tumor features of different breast cancer immunophenotypes. Patients and methods We identified all premenopausal women aged 45 years or less who had been diagnosed with primary breast cancer between January 1999 and November 2005 at a single institution and who had undergone mammography at initial diagnosis. Patient characteristics including clinical, histologic, and mammographic features of breast cancers were tabulated by immunophenotype and compared with the chi-square test or the Kruskal–Wallis test. The P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results We identified 198 premenopausal women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Thirty-eight (19%) women had TRN cancer, 67 (34%) had HER2+ cancer, and 93 (47%) had ER+ cancer. Mammographic density and cancer visibility were similar between all immunophenotypes of cancers. TRN cancers were more frequently associated with a mass (33/33 [100%]) than were HER2+ (35/64 [55%]) and ER+ cancers (42/87 [48%]) (P < 0.0001), and were less frequently associated with calcifications (5/33 [15%]) than were HER2+ (43/64 [67%]) and ER+ (53/87 [61%]) cancers (P < 0.0001). Associated ductal carcinoma in situ was reported in 18% (7/38), 57% (38/67), and 48% (52/93) of TRN, HER2+, and ER+ patients, respectively (P = 0.0003). Conclusion The mammographic features of TRN breast cancer suggest more rapid carcinogenesis leading directly to invasive cancer, that may require adjunct imaging tools for early diagnosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Perou CM, Jeffrey SS, van de Rijn M et al (1999) Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9212–9217PubMedCrossRef Perou CM, Jeffrey SS, van de Rijn M et al (1999) Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9212–9217PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752PubMedCrossRef Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874PubMedCrossRef Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA et al (2006) Race, breastcancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 295:2492–2502PubMedCrossRef Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA et al (2006) Race, breastcancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 295:2492–2502PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V (2007) Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer 109:1721–1728PubMedCrossRef Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V (2007) Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer 109:1721–1728PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M et al (2006) Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5652–5657PubMedCrossRef Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M et al (2006) Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5652–5657PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lancet (1997) Pathology of familial breast cancer: differences between breast cancers in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and sporadic cases. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Lancet 349:1505–1510CrossRef Lancet (1997) Pathology of familial breast cancer: differences between breast cancers in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and sporadic cases. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Lancet 349:1505–1510CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eisinger F, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Longy M et al (1996) Germ line mutation at BRCA1 affects the histoprognostic grade in hereditary breast cancer. Cancer Res 56:471–474PubMed Eisinger F, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Longy M et al (1996) Germ line mutation at BRCA1 affects the histoprognostic grade in hereditary breast cancer. Cancer Res 56:471–474PubMed
9.
go back to reference Marcus JN, Watson P, Page DL et al (1996) Hereditary breast cancer: pathobiology, prognosis, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene linkage. Cancer 77:697–709PubMedCrossRef Marcus JN, Watson P, Page DL et al (1996) Hereditary breast cancer: pathobiology, prognosis, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene linkage. Cancer 77:697–709PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC et al (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215:267–279PubMed Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC et al (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215:267–279PubMed
12.
go back to reference Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ et al (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1095–1102PubMedCrossRef Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ et al (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1095–1102PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317–1325PubMedCrossRef Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317–1325PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US—diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207:191–199PubMed Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US—diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207:191–199PubMed
16.
go back to reference Komenaka IK, Ditkoff BA, Joseph KA et al (2004) The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations. Cancer 100:2079–2083PubMedCrossRef Komenaka IK, Ditkoff BA, Joseph KA et al (2004) The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations. Cancer 100:2079–2083PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Johnson MS, Gonzales MN, Bizila S (2005) Responsible conduct of radiology research. Part V. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and research. Radiology 237:757–764PubMedCrossRef Johnson MS, Gonzales MN, Bizila S (2005) Responsible conduct of radiology research. Part V. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and research. Radiology 237:757–764PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (ACR) (2003) ACR BI-RADS—Mammography, 4th edn. In: ACR breast imaging reporting and data system, Breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA. American College of Radiology American College of Radiology (ACR) (2003) ACR BI-RADS—Mammography, 4th edn. In: ACR breast imaging reporting and data system, Breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA. American College of Radiology
19.
go back to reference Albain KS, Allred C, Clark GM (1994) Breast cancer outcome and predictors of outcome: are there age differentials? Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16:335–342 Albain KS, Allred C, Clark GM (1994) Breast cancer outcome and predictors of outcome: are there age differentials? Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16:335–342
20.
go back to reference Backhouse CM, Lloyd-Davis ER, Shousha S (1987) Carcinoma of the breast in women aged 35 or less. Br J Surg 74:591–593PubMedCrossRef Backhouse CM, Lloyd-Davis ER, Shousha S (1987) Carcinoma of the breast in women aged 35 or less. Br J Surg 74:591–593PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Marcus JN, Watson P, Page DL, Lynch HT (1994) Pathology and heredity of breast cancer in younger women. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 76:23–34 Marcus JN, Watson P, Page DL, Lynch HT (1994) Pathology and heredity of breast cancer in younger women. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 76:23–34
22.
go back to reference Stalsberg H, Thomas DB, Noonan EA (1989) Histologic types of breast carcinoma in relation to international variation and breast cancer risk factors. Int J Cancer 44:399–409PubMedCrossRef Stalsberg H, Thomas DB, Noonan EA (1989) Histologic types of breast carcinoma in relation to international variation and breast cancer risk factors. Int J Cancer 44:399–409PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Moore OS, Foote FW Jr (1949) The relatively favorable prognosis of medullary carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 2:635–642PubMedCrossRef Moore OS, Foote FW Jr (1949) The relatively favorable prognosis of medullary carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 2:635–642PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Norris HJ, Taylor HB (1970) Carcinoma of the breast in women less than thirty years old. Cancer 26:953–959PubMedCrossRef Norris HJ, Taylor HB (1970) Carcinoma of the breast in women less than thirty years old. Cancer 26:953–959PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Noyes RD, Spanos WJ, Montague ED (1990) Breast cancer in women aged 30 and under. Invest Radiol 25:67–71CrossRef Noyes RD, Spanos WJ, Montague ED (1990) Breast cancer in women aged 30 and under. Invest Radiol 25:67–71CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD, Carter D (1993) Relationship between breast histopathology and family history of breast cancer. Cancer 71:147–153PubMedCrossRef Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD, Carter D (1993) Relationship between breast histopathology and family history of breast cancer. Cancer 71:147–153PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Holland R, Peterse JL, Millis RR et al (1994) Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 11:167–180PubMed Holland R, Peterse JL, Millis RR et al (1994) Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 11:167–180PubMed
28.
go back to reference Evans A, Pinder S, Wilson R et al (1994) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1307–1311PubMed Evans A, Pinder S, Wilson R et al (1994) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1307–1311PubMed
29.
go back to reference Barreau B, Mascarel I, Feuga C et al (2005) Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations. Eur J Radiol 54:55–61PubMedCrossRef Barreau B, Mascarel I, Feuga C et al (2005) Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations. Eur J Radiol 54:55–61PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ferranti C, Coopmans deYoldi G et al (2000) Relationships between age, mammographic features and pathological tumor characteristics in non-palpable breast cancer. Br J Radiol 73:698–705PubMed Ferranti C, Coopmans deYoldi G et al (2000) Relationships between age, mammographic features and pathological tumor characteristics in non-palpable breast cancer. Br J Radiol 73:698–705PubMed
31.
go back to reference Seo BK, Pisano ED, Kuzimak CM et al (2006) Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol 13:1211–1218PubMedCrossRef Seo BK, Pisano ED, Kuzimak CM et al (2006) Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol 13:1211–1218PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Noguchi S, Kasugai T, Miki Y et al (1999) Clinicopathologic analysis of BRCA1- or BRCA2-associated hereditary breast carcinoma in Japanese women. Cancer 85:2200–2205PubMedCrossRef Noguchi S, Kasugai T, Miki Y et al (1999) Clinicopathologic analysis of BRCA1- or BRCA2-associated hereditary breast carcinoma in Japanese women. Cancer 85:2200–2205PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Johannsson TO, Idvall I, Anderson C et al (1997) Tumor biological features of BRCA1-induced breast and ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 33:362–371PubMedCrossRef Johannsson TO, Idvall I, Anderson C et al (1997) Tumor biological features of BRCA1-induced breast and ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 33:362–371PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Crook T, Crossland S, Crompton MR, Osin P, Gusterson BA (1997) P53 mutations in BRCA1-associated familial breast cancer. Lancet 350:638–639PubMedCrossRef Crook T, Crossland S, Crompton MR, Osin P, Gusterson BA (1997) P53 mutations in BRCA1-associated familial breast cancer. Lancet 350:638–639PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lakhani SR, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP et al (1998) Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1138–1145PubMedCrossRef Lakhani SR, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP et al (1998) Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1138–1145PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Jacquemier J, Eisinger F, Guinebretiere JM, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sobol H (1996) Intraductal component and BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Lancet 348:1098CrossRef Jacquemier J, Eisinger F, Guinebretiere JM, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sobol H (1996) Intraductal component and BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Lancet 348:1098CrossRef
37.
38.
go back to reference Claus EB, Petruzella S, Matloff E, Carter D (2005) Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA 293:964–969PubMedCrossRef Claus EB, Petruzella S, Matloff E, Carter D (2005) Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA 293:964–969PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Ridolfi RL, Rosen PP, Port A, Kinne D, Miké V (1977) Medullary carcinoma of the breast. A clinicopathologic study with 10 year follow-up. Cancer 40:1365–1385PubMedCrossRef Ridolfi RL, Rosen PP, Port A, Kinne D, Miké V (1977) Medullary carcinoma of the breast. A clinicopathologic study with 10 year follow-up. Cancer 40:1365–1385PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Rapin V, Contesso G, Mouriesse H et al (1988) Medullary breast carcinoma. A reevaluation of 95 cases of breast cancer with inflammatory stroma. Cancer 61:2503–2510PubMedCrossRef Rapin V, Contesso G, Mouriesse H et al (1988) Medullary breast carcinoma. A reevaluation of 95 cases of breast cancer with inflammatory stroma. Cancer 61:2503–2510PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mammographic features of triple receptor-negative primary breast cancers in young premenopausal women
Authors
Wei-Tse Yang
Mark Dryden
Kristine Broglio
Michael Gilcrease
Shaheenah Dawood
Peter J. Dempsey
Vicente Valero
Gabriel Hortobagyi
Deann Atchley
Banu Arun
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9810-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine