Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2/2014

01-04-2014 | Research Article

Examining the Electro-Neural Interface of Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychophysics, CT Scans, and Speech Understanding

Authors: Christopher J. Long, Timothy A. Holden, Gary H. McClelland, Wendy S. Parkinson, Clough Shelton, David C. Kelsall, Zachary M. Smith

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between focused-stimulation thresholds, electrode positions, and speech understanding in deaf subjects treated with a cochlear implant (CI). Focused stimulation is more selective than monopolar stimulation, which excites broad regions of the cochlea, so may be more sensitive as a probe of neural survival patterns. Focused thresholds are on average higher and more variable across electrodes than monopolar thresholds. We presume that relatively high focused thresholds are the result of larger distances between the electrodes and the neurons. Two factors are likely to contribute to this distance: (1) the physical position of electrodes relative to the modiolus, where the excitable auditory neurons are normally located, and (2) the pattern of neural survival along the length of the cochlea, since local holes in the neural population will increase the distance between an electrode and the nearest neurons. Electrode-to-modiolus distance was measured from high-resolution CT scans of the cochleae of CI users whose focused-stimulation thresholds were also measured. A hierarchical set of linear models of electrode-to-modiolus distance versus threshold showed a significant increase in threshold with electrode-to-modiolus distance (average slope = 11 dB/mm). The residual of these models was hypothesized to reflect neural survival in each subject. Consonant–Nucleus–Consonant (CNC) word scores were significantly correlated with the within-subject variance of threshold (r 2 = 0.82), but not with within-subject variance of electrode distance (r 2 = 0.03). Speech understanding also significantly correlated with how well distance explained each subject’s threshold data (r 2 = 0.63). That is, subjects with focused thresholds that were well described by electrode position had better speech scores. Our results suggest that speech understanding is highly impacted by individual patterns of neural survival and that these patterns manifest themselves in how well (or poorly) electrode position predicts focused thresholds.
Literature
go back to reference Bierer JA (2007) Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1642.PubMedCrossRef Bierer JA (2007) Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1642.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bierer JA (2010) Probing the electrode–neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation. Trends Amplif 14:84–95.PubMed Bierer JA (2010) Probing the electrode–neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation. Trends Amplif 14:84–95.PubMed
go back to reference Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, Lindström B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, Whitford L (1996) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1:293–306PubMedCrossRef Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, Lindström B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, Whitford L (1996) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1:293–306PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Blamey PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, Clark GM, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Hollow RD (1992) Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101:342–8PubMed Blamey PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, Clark GM, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Hollow RD (1992) Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101:342–8PubMed
go back to reference Cohen LT, Saunders E, Clark GM (2001) Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear Res 155:63–81PubMedCrossRef Cohen LT, Saunders E, Clark GM (2001) Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear Res 155:63–81PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fayad JN, Linthicum FH (2006) Multichannel cochlear implants: relation of histopathology to performance. Laryngoscope 116:1310–20.PubMedCrossRef Fayad JN, Linthicum FH (2006) Multichannel cochlear implants: relation of histopathology to performance. Laryngoscope 116:1310–20.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gordon KA, Papsin BC (2013) From nucleus 24 to 513: changing cochlear implant design affects auditory response thresholds. Otol Neurotol 34:436–42.PubMedCrossRef Gordon KA, Papsin BC (2013) From nucleus 24 to 513: changing cochlear implant design affects auditory response thresholds. Otol Neurotol 34:436–42.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, Holden TA, Brenner C, Potts LG, Gotter BD, Vanderhoof SS, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner MW (2013) Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34:342–60.PubMedCrossRef Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, Holden TA, Brenner C, Potts LG, Gotter BD, Vanderhoof SS, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner MW (2013) Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34:342–60.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van den Honert C, Carlyon R, Long C, Smith Z, Shelton C, Kelsall D (2007) Perceptual evidence of spatially-restricted excitation with focused stimulation. Conf Implantable Audit Prostheses 2:58 Van den Honert C, Carlyon R, Long C, Smith Z, Shelton C, Kelsall D (2007) Perceptual evidence of spatially-restricted excitation with focused stimulation. Conf Implantable Audit Prostheses 2:58
go back to reference Van den Honert C, Kelsall DC (2007) Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels. J Acoust Soc Am 121:3703–16.PubMedCrossRef Van den Honert C, Kelsall DC (2007) Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels. J Acoust Soc Am 121:3703–16.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Judd CM, McClelland GH, Ryan CS (2009) Data analysis: a model comparison approach, 2nd ed. Routledge, New York, p 328 Judd CM, McClelland GH, Ryan CS (2009) Data analysis: a model comparison approach, 2nd ed. Routledge, New York, p 328
go back to reference Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clark GM, Ramsden RT, Raine CH (1998) Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 118:313–326CrossRef Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clark GM, Ramsden RT, Raine CH (1998) Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 118:313–326CrossRef
go back to reference Khan AM, Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB (2005) Is word recognition correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants? Laryngoscope 115:672–7.PubMedCrossRef Khan AM, Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB (2005) Is word recognition correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants? Laryngoscope 115:672–7.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Landry TG, Fallon JB, Wise AK, Shepherd RK (2013) Chronic neurotrophin delivery promotes ectopic neurite growth from the spiral ganglion of deafened cochleae without compromising the spatial selectivity ofcochlear implants. J Comp Neurol. doi:10.1002/cne.23318 PubMed Landry TG, Fallon JB, Wise AK, Shepherd RK (2013) Chronic neurotrophin delivery promotes ectopic neurite growth from the spiral ganglion of deafened cochleae without compromising the spatial selectivity ofcochlear implants. J Comp Neurol. doi:10.​1002/​cne.​23318 PubMed
go back to reference Leake PA, Stakhovskaya O, Hetherington A, Rebscher SJ, Bonham B (2013) Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and electrical stimulation on survival and function of cochlear spiral ganglion neurons in deafened, developing cats. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 14:187–211.PubMedCrossRef Leake PA, Stakhovskaya O, Hetherington A, Rebscher SJ, Bonham B (2013) Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and electrical stimulation on survival and function of cochlear spiral ganglion neurons in deafened, developing cats. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 14:187–211.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Li PM, Somdas MA, Eddington DK, Nadol JB (2007) Analysis of intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue formation in human subjects with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116:731–8PubMed Li PM, Somdas MA, Eddington DK, Nadol JB (2007) Analysis of intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue formation in human subjects with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116:731–8PubMed
go back to reference Makary CA, Shin J, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, Merchant SN (2011) Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:711–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Makary CA, Shin J, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, Merchant SN (2011) Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:711–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nadol JB, Young YS, Glynn RJ (1989) Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98:411–6PubMed Nadol JB, Young YS, Glynn RJ (1989) Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98:411–6PubMed
go back to reference Nadol JB, Shiao J, Burgess B, Ketten D, Eddington D, Gantz B, Kos I, Montandon P, Coker N, Roland JJ, Shallop J (2001) Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:883–891 Nadol JB, Shiao J, Burgess B, Ketten D, Eddington D, Gantz B, Kos I, Montandon P, Coker N, Roland JJ, Shallop J (2001) Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:883–891
go back to reference Peterson GE, Lehiste I (1962) Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Dis 27:62–70 Peterson GE, Lehiste I (1962) Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Dis 27:62–70
go back to reference Pfingst BE, Xu L (2004) Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:11–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pfingst BE, Xu L (2004) Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:11–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pfingst BE, Xu L, Thompson CS (2004) Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition. Audiol Neurootol 9:341–52.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pfingst BE, Xu L, Thompson CS (2004) Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition. Audiol Neurootol 9:341–52.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Roland JT (2005) A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion technique. Laryngoscope 115:1325–39.PubMedCrossRef Roland JT (2005) A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion technique. Laryngoscope 115:1325–39.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Roland P, Wright C (2006) Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 64:11–30PubMed Roland P, Wright C (2006) Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 64:11–30PubMed
go back to reference Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, Voie AH, Brunsden B, Neely JG, Saxon EA, Hullar TE, Finley CC (2007) In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 197:2–24PubMed Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, Voie AH, Brunsden B, Neely JG, Saxon EA, Hullar TE, Finley CC (2007) In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 197:2–24PubMed
go back to reference Smith ZM, Parkinson WS, Long CJ (2013) Multipolar current focusing increases spectral resolution in cochlear implants. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Jul 2013:2796–2799. Smith ZM, Parkinson WS, Long CJ (2013) Multipolar current focusing increases spectral resolution in cochlear implants. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Jul 2013:2796–2799.
go back to reference Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA (2007) Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:220–33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA (2007) Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:220–33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Teymouri J, Hullar TE, Holden TA, Chole RA (2011) Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis. Otol Neurotol 32:980–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Teymouri J, Hullar TE, Holden TA, Chole RA (2011) Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis. Otol Neurotol 32:980–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Todt I, Basta D, Eisenschenk A, Ernst A (2005) The “pull-back” technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:751–4.PubMedCrossRef Todt I, Basta D, Eisenschenk A, Ernst A (2005) The “pull-back” technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:751–4.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vanpoucke F, Boermans P, Frijns J (2012) Assessing the placement of a cochlear electrode array by multidimensional scaling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:307–310PubMedCrossRef Vanpoucke F, Boermans P, Frijns J (2012) Assessing the placement of a cochlear electrode array by multidimensional scaling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:307–310PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Voie AH (2002) Imaging the intact guinea pig tympanic bulla by orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning microscopy. Hear Res 171:119–128PubMedCrossRef Voie AH (2002) Imaging the intact guinea pig tympanic bulla by orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning microscopy. Hear Res 171:119–128PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zwolan TA, Collins LM, Wakefield GH (1997) Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 102:3673–85PubMedCrossRef Zwolan TA, Collins LM, Wakefield GH (1997) Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 102:3673–85PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Examining the Electro-Neural Interface of Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychophysics, CT Scans, and Speech Understanding
Authors
Christopher J. Long
Timothy A. Holden
Gary H. McClelland
Wendy S. Parkinson
Clough Shelton
David C. Kelsall
Zachary M. Smith
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-013-0437-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2/2014 Go to the issue