Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2/2014

01-04-2014 | Research Article

Interindividual Variation of Sensitivity to Frequency Modulation: Its Relation with Click-Evoked and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions

Authors: Sho Otsuka, Shigeto Furukawa, Shimpei Yamagishi, Koich Hirota, Makio Kashino

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

The frequency modulation detection limen (FMDL) with a low modulation rate has been used as a measure of the listener’s sensitivity to the temporal fine structure of a stimulus, which is represented by the pattern of neural phase locking at the auditory periphery. An alternative to the phase locking cue, the excitation pattern cue, has been suggested to contribute to frequency modulation (FM) detection. If the excitation pattern cue has a significant contribution to low-rate FM detection, the functionality of cochlear mechanics underlying the excitation pattern should be reflected in low-rate FMDLs. This study explored the relationship between cochlear mechanics and low-rate FMDLs by evaluating physiological measures of cochlear functions, namely distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs). DPOAEs and CEOAEs reflect nonlinear cochlear gain. CEOAEs have been considered also to reflect the degree of irregularity, such as spatial variations in number or geometry of outer hair cells, on the basilar membrane. The irregularity profile could affect the reliability of the phase locking cue, thereby influencing the FMDLs. The features extracted from DPOAEs and CEOAEs, when combined, could account for more than 30 % of the inter-listener variation of low-rate FMDLs. This implies that both cochlear gain and irregularity on the basilar membrane have some influence on sensitivity to low-rate FM: the loss of cochlear gain or broader tuning might influence the excitation pattern cue, and the irregularity on the basilar membrane might disturb the ability to use the phase locking cue.
Literature
go back to reference Cook RD (1977) Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics 19:15–18CrossRef Cook RD (1977) Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics 19:15–18CrossRef
go back to reference Dorn PA, Piskorski P, Gorga MP et al (1999) Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses. Ear Hear 20:149–163PubMedCrossRef Dorn PA, Piskorski P, Gorga MP et al (1999) Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses. Ear Hear 20:149–163PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dorn PA, Konrad-Martin D, Neely ST et al (2001) Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 110:3119–3131PubMedCrossRef Dorn PA, Konrad-Martin D, Neely ST et al (2001) Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 110:3119–3131PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Epstein M, Buus S, Florentine M (2004) The effects of window delay, delinearization, and frequency on tone-burst otoacoustic emission input/output measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 116:1160–1167PubMedCrossRef Epstein M, Buus S, Florentine M (2004) The effects of window delay, delinearization, and frequency on tone-burst otoacoustic emission input/output measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 116:1160–1167PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ernst SMA, Moore BCJ (2010) Mechanisms underlying the detection of frequency modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 128:3642–3648PubMedCrossRef Ernst SMA, Moore BCJ (2010) Mechanisms underlying the detection of frequency modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 128:3642–3648PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Feeney MP, Grant IL, Marryott LP (2003) Wideband energy reflectance measurements in adults with middle-ear disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res 46:901–911PubMedCrossRef Feeney MP, Grant IL, Marryott LP (2003) Wideband energy reflectance measurements in adults with middle-ear disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res 46:901–911PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Grose JH, Mamo SK (2012) Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects. Hear Res 294:49–54PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Grose JH, Mamo SK (2012) Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects. Hear Res 294:49–54PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hilger AW, Furness DN, Wilson JP (1995) The possible relationship between transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and organ of Corti irregularities in the guinea pig. Hear Res 84:1–11PubMedCrossRef Hilger AW, Furness DN, Wilson JP (1995) The possible relationship between transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and organ of Corti irregularities in the guinea pig. Hear Res 84:1–11PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Johannesen PT, Lopez-Poveda EA (2010) Correspondence between behavioral and individually “optimized” otoacoustic emission estimates of human cochlear input/output curves. J Acoust Soc Am 127:3602–3613PubMedCrossRef Johannesen PT, Lopez-Poveda EA (2010) Correspondence between behavioral and individually “optimized” otoacoustic emission estimates of human cochlear input/output curves. J Acoust Soc Am 127:3602–3613PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kalluri R, Shera CA (2007) Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 121:2097–2110PubMedCrossRef Kalluri R, Shera CA (2007) Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 121:2097–2110PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Keefe DH (1998) Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Measurement theory and nonlinear coherence. J Acoust Soc Am 103:3489–3498CrossRef Keefe DH (1998) Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Measurement theory and nonlinear coherence. J Acoust Soc Am 103:3489–3498CrossRef
go back to reference Keefe DH, Ling R, Bulen JC (1992) Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient. J Acoust Soc Am 91:470–485PubMedCrossRef Keefe DH, Ling R, Bulen JC (1992) Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient. J Acoust Soc Am 91:470–485PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Keefe DH, Goodman SS, Ellison JC et al (2011) Detecting high-frequency hearing loss with click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 129:245–261PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Keefe DH, Goodman SS, Ellison JC et al (2011) Detecting high-frequency hearing loss with click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 129:245–261PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kemp DT (1978) Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 64:1386–1391PubMedCrossRef Kemp DT (1978) Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 64:1386–1391PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kummer P, Janssen T, Hulin P, Arnold W (2000) Optimal L1–L2 primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans. Hear Res 146:47–56PubMedCrossRef Kummer P, Janssen T, Hulin P, Arnold W (2000) Optimal L1–L2 primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans. Hear Res 146:47–56PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lachenbruch PA, Mickey MR (1968) Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis. Technometrics 10:1–11CrossRef Lachenbruch PA, Mickey MR (1968) Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis. Technometrics 10:1–11CrossRef
go back to reference Lacher-Fougère S, Demany L (1998) Modulation detection by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol 37:109–121CrossRef Lacher-Fougère S, Demany L (1998) Modulation detection by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol 37:109–121CrossRef
go back to reference Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Probst R, Coats AC (1988) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy. Hear Res 33:69–93PubMedCrossRef Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Probst R, Coats AC (1988) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy. Hear Res 33:69–93PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lucertini M, Bergamaschi A, Urbani L (1996) Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in occupational medicine as an auditory screening test for employment. Br J Audiol 30:79–88PubMedCrossRef Lucertini M, Bergamaschi A, Urbani L (1996) Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in occupational medicine as an auditory screening test for employment. Br J Audiol 30:79–88PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Sek A (1994) Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 96:741–751PubMedCrossRef Moore BCJ, Sek A (1994) Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 96:741–751PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Sek A (1995) Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and modulation waveform on the detection of modulation and the discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation versus frequency modulation). J Acoust Soc Am 97:2468–2478PubMedCrossRef Moore BCJ, Sek A (1995) Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and modulation waveform on the detection of modulation and the discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation versus frequency modulation). J Acoust Soc Am 97:2468–2478PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Sek A (1996) Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2320–2331PubMedCrossRef Moore BCJ, Sek A (1996) Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2320–2331PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Skrodzka E (2002) Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 111:327–335PubMedCrossRef Moore BCJ, Skrodzka E (2002) Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 111:327–335PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Probst R, Harris FP (1993) A comparison of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. In: Allum JHJ, Allum-Mecklenburg DJ, Probst R, Harris FP (eds) Prog. Brain Res. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 91–99 Probst R, Harris FP (1993) A comparison of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. In: Allum JHJ, Allum-Mecklenburg DJ, Probst R, Harris FP (eds) Prog. Brain Res. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 91–99
go back to reference Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Coats AC (1987) Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol 8:73–81PubMedCrossRef Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Coats AC (1987) Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol 8:73–81PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1991) A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 89:2027–2067PubMedCrossRef Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1991) A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 89:2027–2067PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ruggles D, Bharadwaj H, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2011) Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:15516–15521PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ruggles D, Bharadwaj H, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2011) Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:15516–15521PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schairer KS, Fitzpatrick D, Keefe DH (2003) Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears. J Acoust Soc Am 114:944–966PubMedCrossRef Schairer KS, Fitzpatrick D, Keefe DH (2003) Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears. J Acoust Soc Am 114:944–966PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sek A, Moore BCJ (1995) Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency, measured in several ways. J Acoust Soc Am 97:2479–2486PubMedCrossRef Sek A, Moore BCJ (1995) Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency, measured in several ways. J Acoust Soc Am 97:2479–2486PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Siegel JH, Hirohata ET (1994) Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies. Hear Res 80:146–152PubMedCrossRef Siegel JH, Hirohata ET (1994) Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies. Hear Res 80:146–152PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sisto R, Moleti A (2005) On the large-scale spectral structure of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 117:1234–1240PubMedCrossRef Sisto R, Moleti A (2005) On the large-scale spectral structure of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 117:1234–1240PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sisto R, Moleti A, Shera CA (2007) Cochlear reflectivity in transmission-line models and otoacoustic emission characteristic time delays. J Acoust Soc Am 122:3554–3561PubMedCrossRef Sisto R, Moleti A, Shera CA (2007) Cochlear reflectivity in transmission-line models and otoacoustic emission characteristic time delays. J Acoust Soc Am 122:3554–3561PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Strelcyk O, Dau T (2009) Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 125:3328–3345PubMedCrossRef Strelcyk O, Dau T (2009) Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 125:3328–3345PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wright A (1984) Dimensions of the cochlear stereocilia in man and the guinea pig. Hear Res 13:89–98PubMedCrossRef Wright A (1984) Dimensions of the cochlear stereocilia in man and the guinea pig. Hear Res 13:89–98PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Yates GK, Withnell RH (1999) The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 136:49–64PubMedCrossRef Yates GK, Withnell RH (1999) The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 136:49–64PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zweig G, Shera CA (1995) The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 98:2018–2047PubMedCrossRef Zweig G, Shera CA (1995) The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 98:2018–2047PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zwicker E (1965) Temporal effects in simultaneous masking by white-noise bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 37:653–663CrossRef Zwicker E (1965) Temporal effects in simultaneous masking by white-noise bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 37:653–663CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Interindividual Variation of Sensitivity to Frequency Modulation: Its Relation with Click-Evoked and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions
Authors
Sho Otsuka
Shigeto Furukawa
Shimpei Yamagishi
Koich Hirota
Makio Kashino
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-013-0439-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2/2014 Go to the issue