Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 3/2012

01-06-2012 | Original Article

Evaluation of teicoplanin dosing designs to achieve a new target trough concentration

Authors: Takashi Ueda, Yoshio Takesue, Kazuhiko Nakajima, Kaoru Ichki, Yasunao Wada, Toshie Tsuchida, Yoshiko Takahashi, Mika Ishihara, Sumiyo Tatsumi, Takeshi Kimura, Hiroki Ikeuchi, Motoi Uchino

Published in: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) creep in vancomycin has prompted guidelines that recommend a target trough concentration (C min) of 15–20 mg/L, and it is also considered necessary to set a C min of >15 mg/L for teicoplanin (TEIC), especially in patients with complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the appropriate TEIC regimen for reaching the revised target C min (15–30 mg/L) in patients with normal renal function and those with renal dysfunction. We analyzed patients with MRSA infections who were treated with TEIC between July 2006 and December 2009. Two-day loading regimen was studied in patients with non-renal-dysfunction (group 1). The 1-day loading regimen was studied in patients with non-renal-dysfunction (group 2, control) and in patients with renal dysfunction (group 3). The 178 patients in the study consisted of 76, 28, and 74 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. C min on day 4 was 14.6 ± 5.6, 11.9 ± 4.1, and 13.5 ± 4.2 mg/L, and the proportion of patients achieving the revised target range was 34.2%, 17.9%, and 20.3%, respectively. Only one patient in group 1 revealed C min of >30 mg/L. Treatment success rates, nephrotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity were similar among the three groups. It was difficult to achieve the revised target C min with the 2-day loading regimen in patients without renal dysfunction and with the standard TEIC regimen, even in patients with renal dysfunction. Further investigation of an even higher TEIC dosing regimen is considered necessary.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Svetitsky S, Leibovici L, Paul M. Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:4069–79.PubMedCrossRef Svetitsky S, Leibovici L, Paul M. Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:4069–79.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Van der Auwera P, Aoun M, Meunier F. Randomized study of vancomycin versus teicoplanin for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections in immunocompromised hosts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:451–7.PubMed Van der Auwera P, Aoun M, Meunier F. Randomized study of vancomycin versus teicoplanin for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections in immunocompromised hosts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:451–7.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Begg EJ, Barclay ML, Kirkpatrick CM. The therapeutic monitoring of antimicrobial agents. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:35S–43S.PubMedCrossRef Begg EJ, Barclay ML, Kirkpatrick CM. The therapeutic monitoring of antimicrobial agents. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:35S–43S.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schaison G, Graninger W, Bouza E. Teicoplanin in the treatment of serious infection. J Chemother. 2000;12:26–33.PubMed Schaison G, Graninger W, Bouza E. Teicoplanin in the treatment of serious infection. J Chemother. 2000;12:26–33.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Matthews PC, Taylor A, Byren I, Atkins BL. Teicoplanin levels in bone and joint infections: are standard doses subtherapeutic? J Infect. 2007;55:408–13.PubMedCrossRef Matthews PC, Taylor A, Byren I, Atkins BL. Teicoplanin levels in bone and joint infections: are standard doses subtherapeutic? J Infect. 2007;55:408–13.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weinbren M, Struthers K. Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with reduced susceptibility to teicoplanin during therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50:306–7.PubMedCrossRef Weinbren M, Struthers K. Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with reduced susceptibility to teicoplanin during therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50:306–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brink AJ, Richards GA, Cummins RR, Lambson J. Gauteng understanding teicoplanin serum levels (GUTS) study group. Recommendations to achieve rapid therapeutic teicoplanin plasma concentrations in adult hospitalised patients treated for sepsis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32:455–8.PubMedCrossRef Brink AJ, Richards GA, Cummins RR, Lambson J. Gauteng understanding teicoplanin serum levels (GUTS) study group. Recommendations to achieve rapid therapeutic teicoplanin plasma concentrations in adult hospitalised patients treated for sepsis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32:455–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Harding I, MacGowan AP, White LO, Darley ES, Reed V. Teicoplanin therapy for Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia: relationship between pre-dose serum concentrations and outcome. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45:835–41.PubMedCrossRef Harding I, MacGowan AP, White LO, Darley ES, Reed V. Teicoplanin therapy for Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia: relationship between pre-dose serum concentrations and outcome. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45:835–41.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Steinkraus G, White R, Friedrich L. Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001–05. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:788–94.PubMedCrossRef Steinkraus G, White R, Friedrich L. Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001–05. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:788–94.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R Jr, Craig W, Billeter M, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.PubMedCrossRef Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, Moellering R Jr, Craig W, Billeter M, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hidayat LK, Hsu DI, Quist R, Shriner KA, Wong-Beringer A. High-dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity. Arch Intern Med. 2006;23:2138–44.CrossRef Hidayat LK, Hsu DI, Quist R, Shriner KA, Wong-Beringer A. High-dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity. Arch Intern Med. 2006;23:2138–44.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lodise TP, Lomaestro B, Graves J, Drusano GL. Larger vancomycin doses (at least four grams per day) are associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1330–6.PubMedCrossRef Lodise TP, Lomaestro B, Graves J, Drusano GL. Larger vancomycin doses (at least four grams per day) are associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1330–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lamont E, Seaton RA, Macpherson M, Semple L, Bell E, Thomson AH. Development of teicoplanin dosage guidelines for patients treated within an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64:181–7.PubMedCrossRef Lamont E, Seaton RA, Macpherson M, Semple L, Bell E, Thomson AH. Development of teicoplanin dosage guidelines for patients treated within an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64:181–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pea F, Viale P, Candoni A, Pavan F, Pageni L, Dasini D, et al. Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43:405–15.PubMedCrossRef Pea F, Viale P, Candoni A, Pavan F, Pageni L, Dasini D, et al. Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43:405–15.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mimoz O, Rolland D, Adoun M, Marchand S, Breilh D, Brumpt I, et al. Steady-state trough serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations of teicoplanin 12 mg/kg per day in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:775–9.PubMedCrossRef Mimoz O, Rolland D, Adoun M, Marchand S, Breilh D, Brumpt I, et al. Steady-state trough serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations of teicoplanin 12 mg/kg per day in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:775–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pea F, Brollo L, Viale P, Pavan F, Furlanut M. Teicoplanin therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients: a retrospective study emphasizing the importance of a loading dose. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:971–5.PubMedCrossRef Pea F, Brollo L, Viale P, Pavan F, Furlanut M. Teicoplanin therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients: a retrospective study emphasizing the importance of a loading dose. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:971–5.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.PubMedCrossRef Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Senior JR. Monitoring for hepatotoxicity: what is the predictive value of liver “function” tests? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85:331–4.PubMedCrossRef Senior JR. Monitoring for hepatotoxicity: what is the predictive value of liver “function” tests? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85:331–4.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yoshida M, Matzno S, Namba H, Nishikata M, Matsuyama K. Statistical analysis of the adverse effects of glycopeptide antibiotics, based on pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics (PK/TK). J Infect Chemother. 2006;12:114–8.PubMedCrossRef Yoshida M, Matzno S, Namba H, Nishikata M, Matsuyama K. Statistical analysis of the adverse effects of glycopeptide antibiotics, based on pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics (PK/TK). J Infect Chemother. 2006;12:114–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of teicoplanin dosing designs to achieve a new target trough concentration
Authors
Takashi Ueda
Yoshio Takesue
Kazuhiko Nakajima
Kaoru Ichki
Yasunao Wada
Toshie Tsuchida
Yoshiko Takahashi
Mika Ishihara
Sumiyo Tatsumi
Takeshi Kimura
Hiroki Ikeuchi
Motoi Uchino
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1341-321X
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7780
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-011-0325-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 3/2012 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.