Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 11/2011

01-11-2011 | Original Article

Geometry of thoracolumbar vertebral endplates of the human spine

Authors: Hong Chen, Dianming Jiang, Yunsheng Ou, Jian Zhong, Fajin Lv

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 11/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Novel and better vertebral body replacement constructs are always desired by surgeons. Endplate geometry is crucial for the design of those implants, but current literature on that topic is very scarce. The authors present a morphometric study of thoracolumbar vertebral endplates, the goal of which was to analyze the geometry of endplates from T10 inferior to L3 superior by employing data from CT scans, as well as to verify the reliability of data derived from the CT measurement. Reformatted CT scans of 83 individuals were analyzed and sagittal concave angle, location of concave region, sagittal diameter of endplate, coronal concave angle, as well as transverse diameter of endplate were measured in midsagittal plane and specified coronal plane. The data of CT and cadaveric measurements of ten cadaveric specimens were also compared. Age and gender did not influence sagittal concave angle, location of concave region, and coronal concave angle significantly (P > 0.05). No significant difference has been revealed among each endplate for sagittal concave angle (range 162.5°–163.9°) and location of concave region (range 42.5–44.2%), either. Ranging between 170.9° and 175.7°, coronal concave angle was constantly larger in superior endplate than in inferior one. The sagittal and transverse endplate diameters of females were significantly smaller than those of males (P < 0.05), being about 88% of the latter one. The mean difference between CT and cadaveric measurements was small (Cronbach alpha > 0.8). Those morphologic parameters, especially the concavity of endplates, should be taken into consideration when designing novel vertebral body replacement constructs. CT measurement data could be used to calculate most suitable geometric parameters of those implants.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Robertson PA, Rawlinson HJ, Hadlow AT (2004) Radiologic stability of titanium mesh cages for anterior spinal reconstruction following thoracolumbar corpectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:44–52PubMedCrossRef Robertson PA, Rawlinson HJ, Hadlow AT (2004) Radiologic stability of titanium mesh cages for anterior spinal reconstruction following thoracolumbar corpectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:44–52PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tomford WW (1995) Transmission of disease through transplantation of musculoskeletal allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1742–1754PubMed Tomford WW (1995) Transmission of disease through transplantation of musculoskeletal allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1742–1754PubMed
3.
go back to reference Christodoulou AG, Givissis P, Karataglis D et al (2006) Treatment of tuberculous spondylitis with anterior stabilization and titanium cage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:60–65PubMedCrossRef Christodoulou AG, Givissis P, Karataglis D et al (2006) Treatment of tuberculous spondylitis with anterior stabilization and titanium cage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:60–65PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grob D, Daehn S, Mannion AF (2005) Titanium mesh cages (TMC) in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 14:211–221PubMedCrossRef Grob D, Daehn S, Mannion AF (2005) Titanium mesh cages (TMC) in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 14:211–221PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS et al (1987) A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae. Spine 12:362–367PubMedCrossRef Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS et al (1987) A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae. Spine 12:362–367PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T et al (1992) Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 17:299–306PubMedCrossRef Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T et al (1992) Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 17:299–306PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gilad I, Nissan M (1986) A study of vertebra and disc geometric relations of the human cervical and lumbar spine. Spine 11:154–157PubMedCrossRef Gilad I, Nissan M (1986) A study of vertebra and disc geometric relations of the human cervical and lumbar spine. Spine 11:154–157PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hall LT, Esses SI, Noble PC et al (1998) Morphology of the lumbar vertebral endplates. Spine 23:1517–1522PubMedCrossRef Hall LT, Esses SI, Noble PC et al (1998) Morphology of the lumbar vertebral endplates. Spine 23:1517–1522PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zhou SH, McCarthy ID, McGregor AH et al (2000) Geometrical dimensions of the lower lumbar vertebrae—analysis of data from digitised CT images. Eur Spine J 9:242–248PubMedCrossRef Zhou SH, McCarthy ID, McGregor AH et al (2000) Geometrical dimensions of the lower lumbar vertebrae—analysis of data from digitised CT images. Eur Spine J 9:242–248PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hasegawa K, Abe M, Washio T et al (2001) An experimental study on the interface strength between titanium mesh cage and vertebra in reference to vertebral bone mineral density. Spine 26:957–963PubMedCrossRef Hasegawa K, Abe M, Washio T et al (2001) An experimental study on the interface strength between titanium mesh cage and vertebra in reference to vertebral bone mineral density. Spine 26:957–963PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Buttermann GR, Beaubien BP, Freeman AL et al (2009) Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics. Spine J 9:564–573PubMedCrossRef Buttermann GR, Beaubien BP, Freeman AL et al (2009) Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics. Spine J 9:564–573PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Edwards WT, Zheng Y, Ferrara LA et al (2001) Structural features and thickness of the vertebral cortex in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 26:218–225PubMedCrossRef Edwards WT, Zheng Y, Ferrara LA et al (2001) Structural features and thickness of the vertebral cortex in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 26:218–225PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rockoff SD, Sweet E, Bleustein J (1969) The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Calcif Tissue Res 3:163–175PubMedCrossRef Rockoff SD, Sweet E, Bleustein J (1969) The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Calcif Tissue Res 3:163–175PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lowe TG, Hashim S, Wilson LA et al (2004) A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support. Spine 29:2389–2394PubMedCrossRef Lowe TG, Hashim S, Wilson LA et al (2004) A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support. Spine 29:2389–2394PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ferguson SJ, Steffen T (2003) Biomechanics of the aging spine. Eur Spine J Suppl 2:S97–S103CrossRef Ferguson SJ, Steffen T (2003) Biomechanics of the aging spine. Eur Spine J Suppl 2:S97–S103CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Twomey LT, Taylor JR (1987) Age changes in lumbar vertebrae and intervertebral discs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 224:97–104PubMed Twomey LT, Taylor JR (1987) Age changes in lumbar vertebrae and intervertebral discs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 224:97–104PubMed
17.
go back to reference van der Houwen EB, Baron P, Veldhuizen AG et al (2010) Geometry of the intervertebral volume and vertebral endplates of the human spine. Ann Biomed Eng 38:33–40PubMedCrossRef van der Houwen EB, Baron P, Veldhuizen AG et al (2010) Geometry of the intervertebral volume and vertebral endplates of the human spine. Ann Biomed Eng 38:33–40PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Miao S, Sha GZ, Wang YD et al (2008) Imageology change of degenerative cartilage endplate to different degree and its clinical significance. Zhongguo Gu Shang 21:414–417PubMed Miao S, Sha GZ, Wang YD et al (2008) Imageology change of degenerative cartilage endplate to different degree and its clinical significance. Zhongguo Gu Shang 21:414–417PubMed
19.
go back to reference Buttermann GR, Freeman AL, Beaubien BP (2010) In vitro biomechanics of an expandable vertebral body replacement with self-adjusting end plates. Spine J 10:1024–1031PubMedCrossRef Buttermann GR, Freeman AL, Beaubien BP (2010) In vitro biomechanics of an expandable vertebral body replacement with self-adjusting end plates. Spine J 10:1024–1031PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pflugmacher R, Schleicher P, Schaefer J et al (2004) Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 29:1413–1419PubMedCrossRef Pflugmacher R, Schleicher P, Schaefer J et al (2004) Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 29:1413–1419PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314:572PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314:572PubMed
Metadata
Title
Geometry of thoracolumbar vertebral endplates of the human spine
Authors
Hong Chen
Dianming Jiang
Yunsheng Ou
Jian Zhong
Fajin Lv
Publication date
01-11-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 11/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1787-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2011

European Spine Journal 11/2011 Go to the issue