Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Spine Journal
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2003

01-10-2003 | Review

Biomechanics of the aging spine

Authors: Stephen J. Ferguson, Thomas Steffen

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 2/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

The human spine is composed of highly specific tissues and structures, which together provide the extensive range of motion and considerable load carrying capacity required for the physical activities of daily life. Alterations to the form and composition of the individual structures of the spine with increasing age can increase the risk of injury and can have a profound influence on the quality of life. Cancellous bone forms the structural framework of the vertebral body. Individual trabeculae are oriented along the paths of principal forces and play a crucial role in the transfer of the predominantly compressive forces along the spine. Age-related changes to the cancellous core of the vertebra includes a loss of bone mineral density, as well as morphological changes including trabecular thinning, increased intratrabecular spacing, and loss of connectivity between trabeculae. Material and morphological changes may lead to an increased risk of vertebral fracture. The vertebral endplate serves the dual role of containing the adjacent disc and evenly distributing applied loads to the underlying cancellous bone and the cortex of the vertebra. With aging, thinning of the endplate, and loss of bone mineral density increases the risk of endplate fracture. Ossification of the endplate may have consequences for the nutritional supply and hydration of the intervertebral disc. The healthy intervertebral disc provides mobility to the spine and transfers load via hydrostatic pressurization of the hydrated nucleus pulposus. Changes to the tissue properties of the disc, including dehydration and reorganization of the nucleus and stiffening of the annulus fibrosus, markedly alter the mechanics of load transfer in the spine. There is no direct correlation between degenerative changes to the disc and to the adjacent vertebral bodies. Furthermore, advancing age is not the sole factor in the degeneration of the spine. Further study is crucial for understanding the unique biomechanical function of the aging spine.
Literature
1.
Acaroglu ER, Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Foster RJ, Mow VC, Weidenbaum M (1995) Degeneration and aging affect the tensile behavior of human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 20:2690–2701
2.
Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) 'Stress' distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:965–972
3.
Ayotte DC, Ito K, Perren SM, Tepic S (2000) Direction-dependent constriction flow in a poroelastic solid: the intervertebral disc valve. J Biomech Eng 122:587–593
4.
Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D (1989) Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Spine 14:606–610
5.
Cummings SR, Black D (1995) Bone mass measurements and risk of fracture in Caucasian women: a review of findings from prospective studies. Am J Med 98:24S-28S
6.
Dai L (1998) The relationship between vertebral body deformity and disc degeneration in lumbar spine of the senile. Eur Spine J 7:40–44
7.
Ebara S, Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Foster RJ, Mow VC, Weidenbaum M (1996) Tensile properties of nondegenerate human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 21:452–461
8.
Ferguson SJ, Ito K, Nolte LP (2003) Fluid flow and convective transport of solutes within the intervertebral disc. J Biomech (in press)
9.
Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF (2001) Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine 26:889–896
10.
Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG (2002) The effects of bone density and disc degeneration on the structural property distributions in the lower lumbar vertebral endplates. J Orthop Res 20:1115–1120
11.
Hansson TH, Keller TS, Spengler DM (1987) Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading. J Orthop Res 5:479–487
12.
Hansson T, Keller T, Jonson R (1988) Fatigue fracture morphology in human lumbar motion segments. J Spinal Disord 1:33–38
13.
Harada A, Okuizumi H, Miyagi N, Genda E (1998) Correlation between bone mineral density and intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 23:857–861
14.
Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Weidenbaum M, Mow VC (1997) Alterations in the mechanical behavior of the human lumbar nucleus pulposus with degeneration and aging. J Orthop Res 15:318–322
15.
Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Foster RJ, Rawlins BA, Weidenbaum M, Mow VC (1998) Degeneration affects the anisotropic and nonlinear behaviors of human anulus fibrosus in compression. J Biomech 31:535–544
16.
Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Dion JE (1997) Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:1897–1904
17.
Keller TS (1994) Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J Biomech 27:1159–1168
18.
Keller TS, Hansson TH, Abram AC, Spengler DM, Panjabi MM (1989) Regional variations in the compressive properties of lumbar vertebral trabeculae. Effects of disc degeneration. Spine 14:1012–1019
19.
Keller TS, Moeljanto E, Main JA, Spengler DM (1992) Distribution and orientation of bone in the human lumbar vertebral centrum. J Spinal Disord 5:60–74
20.
Keller TS, Ziv I, Moeljanto E, Spengler DM (1993) Interdependence of lumbar disc and subdiscal bone properties: a report of the normal and degenerated spine. J Spinal Disord 6:106–113
21.
Leidig-Bruckner G, Limberg B, Felsenberg D, Bruckner T, Holder S, Kather A, Miksch J, Wuster C, Ziegler R, Scheidt-Nave C (2000) Sex difference in the validity of vertebral deformities as an index of prevalent vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a population survey of older men and women. Osteoporos Int 11:102–119
22.
Mazess RB (1982) On aging bone loss. Clin Orthop 239–252
23.
McBroom RJ, Hayes WC, Edwards WT, Goldberg RP, White AA III (1985) Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1206–1214
24.
National Institutes of Health (2003) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. NIH consensus statement 17:1–36
25.
Neumann P, Ekstrom LA, Keller TS, Perry L, Hansson TH (1994) Aging, vertebral density, and disc degeneration alter the tensile stress-strain characteristics of the human anterior longitudinal ligament. J Orthop Res 12:103–112
26.
Oner FC, van der Rijt RR, Ramos LM, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (1998) Changes in the disc space after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:833–839
27.
Oxland TR, Grant JP, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG (2003) Effects of endplate removal on the structural properties of the lower lumbar vertebral bodies. Spine 28:771–777
28.
Polikeit A (2002) Finite element analyses of the lumbar spine: clinical applications. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Berne
29.
Recke P von der, Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Christiansen C (1996) The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction. Osteoporos Int 6:43–49
30.
Resch A, Schneider B, Bernecker P, Battmann A, Wergedal J, Willvonseder R, Resch H (1995) Risk of vertebral fractures in men: relationship to mineral density of the vertebral body. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1447–1450
31.
Roberts S, Urban JP, Evans H, Eisenstein SM (1996) Transport properties of the human cartilage endplate in relation to its composition and calcification. Spine 21:415–420
32.
Roberts S, McCall IW, Menage J, Haddaway MJ, Eisenstein SM (1997) Does the thickness of the vertebral subchondral bone reflect the composition of the intervertebral disc? Eur Spine J 6:385–389
33.
Shirado O, Kaneda K, Tadano S, Ishikawa H, McAfee PC, Warden KE (1992) Influence of disc degeneration on mechanism of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 17:286–292
34.
Silva MJ, Wang C, Keaveny TM, Hayes WC (1994) Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate. Bone 15:409–414
35.
Silva MJ, Keaveny TM, Hayes WC (1997) Load sharing between the shell and centrum in the lumbar vertebral body. Spine 22:140–150
36.
Twomey LT, Taylor JR (1987) Age changes in lumbar vertebrae and intervertebral discs. Clin Orthop 97–104
37.
Urban JP, McMullin JF (1988) Swelling pressure of the lumbar intervertebral discs: influence of age, spinal level, composition, and degeneration. Spine 13:179–187
38.
Vernon-Roberts B (1988) Disc pathology and disease states. In: Ghosh P (ed) The biology of the intervertebral disc. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 73–120
39.
Wagner AL, Murtagh FR, Arrington JA, Stallworth D (2000) Relationship of Schmorl's nodes to vertebral body endplate fractures and acute endplate disk extrusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:276–281
Metadata
Title
Biomechanics of the aging spine
Authors
Stephen J. Ferguson
Thomas Steffen
Publication date
01-10-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 2/2003
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0621-0

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2003

European Spine Journal 2/2003 Go to the issue

Review

Cervical myelopathy: clinical and neurophysiological evaluation

Review

Recognizing and reporting osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Review

Principles of management of osteometabolic disorders affecting the aging spine

Review

Spinal metastasis in the elderly

Review

Posterior approach to the degenerative cervical spine

Editorial

The aging of the population: a growing concern for spine care in the twenty-first century