Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2022

29-11-2021 | 2021 SAGES Oral

Anatomic location and mechanism of hiatal hernia recurrence: a video-based assessment

Authors: Maria E. Linnaus, Anna Garren, Jon C. Gould

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Hiatal hernia recurrence following surgical repair is common. We sought to define the most common anatomic location and mechanism for hiatal failure to inform technical strategies to decrease recurrence rates.

Methods

Retrospective chart review and video analysis were performed for all recurrent hiatal hernia operations performed by a single surgeon between January 2013 and April 2020. Hiatal recurrences were defined by anatomic quadrants. Recurrences on both left and right on either the anterior or posterior portion of the hiatus were simply classified as ‘anterior’ or ‘posterior’, respectively. Three or more quadrants were defined as circumferential. Mechanism of recurrence was defined as disruption of the previous repair or dilation of the hiatus.

Results

There were 130 patients to meet criteria. Median time to reoperation from previous hiatal repair was 60 months (IQR19.5–132). First-time recurrent repairs accounted for 74%, second time 18%, and three or more previous repairs for 8% of analyzed procedures. Mesh had been placed at the hiatus in a previous operation in 16%. All reoperative cases were completed laparoscopically. Video analysis revealed anterior recurrences were most common (67%), followed by circumferential (29%). There were two with left-anterior recurrence (1.5%), two posterior recurrence (1.5%), and one right-sided recurrence. The mechanism of recurrence was dilation in 74% and disruption in 26%. Disruption as a mechanism was most common in circumferential hiatal failures. Neither the prior number of hiatal surgeries nor the presence of mesh at the time of reoperation correlated with anatomic recurrence location or mechanism. Reoperations in patients with hiatal disruption occurred after a shorter interval when compared to hiatal dilation.

Conclusion

The most common location and mechanism for hiatal hernia recurrence is anterior dilation of the hiatus. Outcomes following techniques designed to reinforce the anterior hiatus and perhaps to prevent hiatal dilation should be explored.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Nason KS, Christie NA, Pennathur A, Jobe BA, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ (2010) Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(2):395–404CrossRef Luketich JD, Nason KS, Christie NA, Pennathur A, Jobe BA, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ (2010) Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(2):395–404CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dallemange B, Kohnen L, Perretta S, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Jehaes C (2011) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate. Ann Surg 253(2):291–296CrossRef Dallemange B, Kohnen L, Perretta S, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Jehaes C (2011) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate. Ann Surg 253(2):291–296CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Saad A, Velanovich V (2020) Anatomic observation of recurrent hiatal hernia: recurrence or disease progression? J Am Coll Surg 230(6):999–1007CrossRef Saad A, Velanovich V (2020) Anatomic observation of recurrent hiatal hernia: recurrence or disease progression? J Am Coll Surg 230(6):999–1007CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zhou T, Harnsberger C, Broderick R, Fuchs H, Talamini M, Jacobsen G, Horgan S, Chang D, Sandler B (2015) Reoperation rates after laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc 29:510–514CrossRef Zhou T, Harnsberger C, Broderick R, Fuchs H, Talamini M, Jacobsen G, Horgan S, Chang D, Sandler B (2015) Reoperation rates after laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc 29:510–514CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Obeid N, Altieri M, Yang J, Park J, Price K, Bates A, Pryor AD (2018) Patterns of reoperation after failed fundoplication: an analysis of 9462 patients. Surg Endosc 32:345–350CrossRef Obeid N, Altieri M, Yang J, Park J, Price K, Bates A, Pryor AD (2018) Patterns of reoperation after failed fundoplication: an analysis of 9462 patients. Surg Endosc 32:345–350CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kanani Z, Gould JC (2021) Laparoscopic fundoplication for refractory GERD: a procedure worth repeating if needed. Surg Endosc 35(1):298–302CrossRef Kanani Z, Gould JC (2021) Laparoscopic fundoplication for refractory GERD: a procedure worth repeating if needed. Surg Endosc 35(1):298–302CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Funk LM, Kanji A, Scott Melvin W, Perry KA (2014) Elective antireflux surgery in the US: an analysis of national trends in utilization and inpatient outcomes from 2005 to 2010. Surg Endosc 28:1712–1719CrossRef Funk LM, Kanji A, Scott Melvin W, Perry KA (2014) Elective antireflux surgery in the US: an analysis of national trends in utilization and inpatient outcomes from 2005 to 2010. Surg Endosc 28:1712–1719CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Morgenthal CB, Lin E, Shane MD, Hunter JG, Smith CD (2007) Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 21(11):1978–1984CrossRef Morgenthal CB, Lin E, Shane MD, Hunter JG, Smith CD (2007) Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 21(11):1978–1984CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Iqbal A, Kakarlapudi GV, Awad ZT, Haynatzki G, Turaga KK, Karu A, Fritz K, Haider M, Mittal SK, Filipi CJ (2006) Assessment of diaphragmatic stressors as risk factors for symptomatic failure of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 10(1):12–21CrossRef Iqbal A, Kakarlapudi GV, Awad ZT, Haynatzki G, Turaga KK, Karu A, Fritz K, Haider M, Mittal SK, Filipi CJ (2006) Assessment of diaphragmatic stressors as risk factors for symptomatic failure of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 10(1):12–21CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kunio NR, Dolan JP, Hunter JG (2015) Short esophagus. Surg Clin North Am 95(3):641–652CrossRef Kunio NR, Dolan JP, Hunter JG (2015) Short esophagus. Surg Clin North Am 95(3):641–652CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Asling B, Jirholt J, Hammond P, Knutsson M, Walentinsson A, Davidson G, Agreus L, Lehmann A, Lagerstrom-Fermer M (2009) Collagen type III alpha I is a gastro-oesophageal reflux disease susceptibility gene and a male risk factor for hiatus hernia. Gut 58(8):1063–1069CrossRef Asling B, Jirholt J, Hammond P, Knutsson M, Walentinsson A, Davidson G, Agreus L, Lehmann A, Lagerstrom-Fermer M (2009) Collagen type III alpha I is a gastro-oesophageal reflux disease susceptibility gene and a male risk factor for hiatus hernia. Gut 58(8):1063–1069CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Suppiah A, Sirimanna P, Vivian SJ, O’Donnell H, Lee G, Falk GL (2017) Temporal patterns of hiatus hernia recurrence and hiatal failure: quality of life and recurrence after revisional surgery. Dis Esophagus 30(4):1–8CrossRef Suppiah A, Sirimanna P, Vivian SJ, O’Donnell H, Lee G, Falk GL (2017) Temporal patterns of hiatus hernia recurrence and hiatal failure: quality of life and recurrence after revisional surgery. Dis Esophagus 30(4):1–8CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Parker M, Bowers SP, Bray JM, Harris AS, Belli EV, Pfluke JM, Preissler S, Asbun HJ, Smith CD (2010) Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation. Surg Endosc 24:3095–3101CrossRef Parker M, Bowers SP, Bray JM, Harris AS, Belli EV, Pfluke JM, Preissler S, Asbun HJ, Smith CD (2010) Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation. Surg Endosc 24:3095–3101CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nadipati K, Bye M, Yamamoto SR, Pallati P, Lee T, Mittal SK (2013) Reoperative intervention in patients with mesh at the hiatus is associated with high incidence of esophageal resection–a single-center experience. J Gastrointest Surg 17:2039–2044CrossRef Nadipati K, Bye M, Yamamoto SR, Pallati P, Lee T, Mittal SK (2013) Reoperative intervention in patients with mesh at the hiatus is associated with high incidence of esophageal resection–a single-center experience. J Gastrointest Surg 17:2039–2044CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Oelschlager BK, Peterson RF, Brunt LM, Soper NJ, Sheppard BC, Mitsumori L, Rohrmann C, Swanstrom LL, Pellegrini CA (2012) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 16:453–459CrossRef Oelschlager BK, Peterson RF, Brunt LM, Soper NJ, Sheppard BC, Mitsumori L, Rohrmann C, Swanstrom LL, Pellegrini CA (2012) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 16:453–459CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM, Khan S (2016) Suture cruroplasty versus prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 263(2):258–266CrossRef Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM, Khan S (2016) Suture cruroplasty versus prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 263(2):258–266CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Obeid NM, Velanovich V (2013) The choice of primary repair or mesh repair for paraesophageal hernia: a decision analysis based on utility scores. Ann Surg 257:655–664CrossRef Obeid NM, Velanovich V (2013) The choice of primary repair or mesh repair for paraesophageal hernia: a decision analysis based on utility scores. Ann Surg 257:655–664CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pfluke JM, Parker M, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ, Smith CD (2012) Use of mesh for hiatal hernia repair: a survey of SAGES members. Surg Endosc 26:1843–1848CrossRef Pfluke JM, Parker M, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ, Smith CD (2012) Use of mesh for hiatal hernia repair: a survey of SAGES members. Surg Endosc 26:1843–1848CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Stavropoulos GP (2002) A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair versus simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 137(6):649–652CrossRef Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Stavropoulos GP (2002) A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair versus simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 137(6):649–652CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Granderath FA, Granderath UM, Pointer R (2008) Laparoscopic revisional fundoplication with circular hiatal mesh prosthesis: the long-term results. World J Surg 32(6):999–1007CrossRef Granderath FA, Granderath UM, Pointer R (2008) Laparoscopic revisional fundoplication with circular hiatal mesh prosthesis: the long-term results. World J Surg 32(6):999–1007CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fisichella PM (2013) A synopsis of techniques for paraesophageal hernia repair: different approaches to current controversies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(5):423–424CrossRef Fisichella PM (2013) A synopsis of techniques for paraesophageal hernia repair: different approaches to current controversies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(5):423–424CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zeljka J, Louie BE (2013) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(5):436–441CrossRef Zeljka J, Louie BE (2013) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(5):436–441CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nwokedi U, Nguyen DT, MeisenBach LM, Chihara R, Chan EY, Graviss EA, Kim MP (2021) Short-term outcome of routine use of EndoFLIP during hiatal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 35(7):3840–3849CrossRef Nwokedi U, Nguyen DT, MeisenBach LM, Chihara R, Chan EY, Graviss EA, Kim MP (2021) Short-term outcome of routine use of EndoFLIP during hiatal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 35(7):3840–3849CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Su B, Novak S, Callahan ZM, Kuchta K, Carbray J, Ujiki M (2020) Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication. Surg Endosc 34(4):1761–1768CrossRef Su B, Novak S, Callahan ZM, Kuchta K, Carbray J, Ujiki M (2020) Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication. Surg Endosc 34(4):1761–1768CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Anatomic location and mechanism of hiatal hernia recurrence: a video-based assessment
Authors
Maria E. Linnaus
Anna Garren
Jon C. Gould
Publication date
29-11-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08887-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2022 Go to the issue