Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease | 2019 SAGES Oral

Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication

Authors: Bailey Su, Stephanie Novak, Zachary M. Callahan, Kristine Kuchta, JoAnn Carbray, Michael B. Ujiki

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of using a functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP™) intra-operatively during hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication. Additionally, we hypothesize that these measurements correlate with long-term outcomes.

Methods

A prospectively maintained quality database was queried. Between 2013 and 2018, 175 patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication, the majority of which also had a hiatal hernia repair. The EndoFLIP™ was used to measure minimum diameter (Dmin), balloon pressure, and distensibility index (DI) at different timepoints throughout the operation. Clinical outcomes were measured up to 2 years after treatment.

Results

Crural closure and fundoplication resulted in a significant increase in balloon pressure and decrease in DI when compared to initial measurements as well as measurements taken after hernia reduction. After 1 year, patients with a final DI < 2.0 mm2/mmHg reported significantly more gas bloat and dysphagia than those with a final DI ≥ 2.0 mm2/mmHg (p = 0.040 and p = 0.025, respectively). This disparity became even more dramatic at 2 years (p = 0.006 and p = 0.004, respectively), with a final DI < 2.0 mm2/mmHg being significantly associated with higher prevalence of daily gas bloat (43.8% vs. 12.0%; p = 0.03). Additionally, patients with a final DI between 2.0 and 3.5 mm2/mmHg reported significantly lower Reflux Symptom Index scores at one year compared to those with a final DI < 2.0 or > 3.5 mm2/mmHg (p = 0.042).

Conclusion

EndoFLIP™ measurements correlate well with patient outcomes, with a final DI between 2 and 3.5 mm2/mmHg potentially being ideal. The EndoFLIP™ can be a useful adjunct in the operating room by providing objective measurements of esophageal distensibility after crural closure and fundoplication.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Richter JE, Rubenstein JH (2018) Presentation and epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 154:267–276CrossRefPubMed Richter JE, Rubenstein JH (2018) Presentation and epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 154:267–276CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dodds WJ, Dent J, Hogan WJ, Helm JF, Hauser R, Patel GK, Egide MS (1982) Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med 307:1547–1552CrossRefPubMed Dodds WJ, Dent J, Hogan WJ, Helm JF, Hauser R, Patel GK, Egide MS (1982) Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med 307:1547–1552CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mehta S, Bennett J, Mahon D, Rhodes M (2006) Prospective trial of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitor therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: seven-year follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1312–1316 (discussion 1316) CrossRefPubMed Mehta S, Bennett J, Mahon D, Rhodes M (2006) Prospective trial of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitor therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: seven-year follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1312–1316 (discussion 1316) CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dallemagne B, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Dewandre JM, Wahlen C, Monami B, Jehaes C (2006) Clinical results of laparoscopic fundoplication at ten years after surgery. Surg Endosc 20:159–165CrossRefPubMed Dallemagne B, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Dewandre JM, Wahlen C, Monami B, Jehaes C (2006) Clinical results of laparoscopic fundoplication at ten years after surgery. Surg Endosc 20:159–165CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Humphries LA, Hernandez JM, Clark W, Luberice K, Ross SB, Rosemurgy AS (2013) Causes of dissatisfaction after laparoscopic fundoplication: the impact of new symptoms, recurrent symptoms, and the patient experience. Surg Endosc 27:1537–1545CrossRefPubMed Humphries LA, Hernandez JM, Clark W, Luberice K, Ross SB, Rosemurgy AS (2013) Causes of dissatisfaction after laparoscopic fundoplication: the impact of new symptoms, recurrent symptoms, and the patient experience. Surg Endosc 27:1537–1545CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Patterson EJ, Herron DM, Hansen PD, Ramzi N, Standage BA, Swanström LL (2000) Effect of an esophageal bougie on the incidence of dysphagia following nissen fundoplication: a prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg 135:1055–1061 (discussion 1061) CrossRefPubMed Patterson EJ, Herron DM, Hansen PD, Ramzi N, Standage BA, Swanström LL (2000) Effect of an esophageal bougie on the incidence of dysphagia following nissen fundoplication: a prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg 135:1055–1061 (discussion 1061) CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, Carrara A, Marrese R, Gaspari AL, Grassi GB (2004) Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg 239:325–337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, Carrara A, Marrese R, Gaspari AL, Grassi GB (2004) Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg 239:325–337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Richter JE (2013) Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: side effects and complications of fundoplication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:465–471 (quiz e39) CrossRefPubMed Richter JE (2013) Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: side effects and complications of fundoplication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:465–471 (quiz e39) CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Hirano I, Kahrilas PJ (2010) Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP). Gastrointest Endosc 72:272–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Hirano I, Kahrilas PJ (2010) Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP). Gastrointest Endosc 72:272–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas K, Soper NJ, Bulsiewicz WJ, McMahon BP, Gregersen H, Pandolfino JE (2010) Esophagogastric junction distensibility after fundoplication assessed with a novel functional luminal imaging probe. J Gastrointest Surg 14:268–276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas K, Soper NJ, Bulsiewicz WJ, McMahon BP, Gregersen H, Pandolfino JE (2010) Esophagogastric junction distensibility after fundoplication assessed with a novel functional luminal imaging probe. J Gastrointest Surg 14:268–276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Ilczyszyn A, Botha AJ (2014) Feasibility of esophagogastric junction distensibility measurement during Nissen fundoplication. Dis Esophagus 27:637–644CrossRefPubMed Ilczyszyn A, Botha AJ (2014) Feasibility of esophagogastric junction distensibility measurement during Nissen fundoplication. Dis Esophagus 27:637–644CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2002) Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice 16:274–277CrossRefPubMed Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2002) Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice 16:274–277CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 20:130–134CrossRefPubMed Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 20:130–134CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, Shi G, Curry J, Joehl RJ, Brasseur JG, Kahrilas PJ (2002) Esophagogastric junction distensibility: a factor contributing to sphincter incompetence. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 282:G1052–G1058CrossRefPubMed Pandolfino JE, Shi G, Curry J, Joehl RJ, Brasseur JG, Kahrilas PJ (2002) Esophagogastric junction distensibility: a factor contributing to sphincter incompetence. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 282:G1052–G1058CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kim MP, Meisenbach LM, Chan EY (2018) Tailored fundoplication with endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe allows for successful minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28:178–182PubMed Kim MP, Meisenbach LM, Chan EY (2018) Tailored fundoplication with endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe allows for successful minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28:178–182PubMed
17.
go back to reference DeHaan RK, Davila D, Frelich MJ, Gould JC (2017) Esophagogastric junction distensibility is greater following Toupet compared to Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 31:193–198CrossRefPubMed DeHaan RK, Davila D, Frelich MJ, Gould JC (2017) Esophagogastric junction distensibility is greater following Toupet compared to Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 31:193–198CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, de Ruigh A, Nicodème F, Xiao Y, Boris L, Kahrilas PJ (2013) Distensibility of the esophagogastric junction assessed with the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP™) in achalasia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 25:496–501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pandolfino JE, de Ruigh A, Nicodème F, Xiao Y, Boris L, Kahrilas PJ (2013) Distensibility of the esophagogastric junction assessed with the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP™) in achalasia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 25:496–501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication
Authors
Bailey Su
Stephanie Novak
Zachary M. Callahan
Kristine Kuchta
JoAnn Carbray
Michael B. Ujiki
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06925-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2020 Go to the issue