Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2015

01-03-2015

Reoperation rates after laparoscopic fundoplication

Authors: Tianzan Zhou, Cristina Harnsberger, Ryan Broderick, Hans Fuchs, Mark Talamini, Garth Jacobsen, Santiago Horgan, David Chang, Bryan Sandler

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Current literature on redo antireflux surgery has limitations due to small sample size or single center experiences. This study aims to evaluate the reoperation rate of laparoscopic fundoplication in a large population database.

Methods

A longitudinal version of the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database from 1995 to 2010 was used. Inclusion criteria were patients who received a laparoscopic fundoplication for uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or hiatal hernia. Patients were excluded if they had complications of GERD, esophageal or gastric cancer, prior esophageal or gastric surgery, vagotomy, esophageal dysmotility, and diaphragmatic hernia with gangrene or obstruction. The outcome was reoperation, specified as another fundoplication or reversal. Analysis was carried out via a Kaplan–Meier plot, hazard curve, and multivariate analysis adjusting for age, race, gender, comorbidities, insurance status, hospital teaching status, and year of procedure.

Results

13,050 patients were included in the study. The 5 and 10-year cumulative reoperation rates were 5.2 % (95 % CI 4.8–5.7%) and 6.9 % (95 % CI 6.1–7.9%), respectively. Of these reoperations, 30 % were performed at a different hospital from that of the initial fundoplication. Reoperation rate was highest at 1 year post-operatively (1.7 % per year), and steadily declined until 4 years post-operatively, after which it remained at approximately 0.5 % per year. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly higher rates of reoperation among younger patients (HR = 3.56 for <30yo; HR = 1.89 for 30–50yo; HR = 1.65 for 50–65yo) and female patients (HR = 1.35).

Conclusions

Nearly one third of reoperations after failed laparoscopic fundoplication occur at a hospital different from the initial operation, which raises concern that existing literature does not reflect the true reoperation rate. The reoperation rate is highest in the first year postoperatively. The reasons for the higher rate of reoperation in females and younger patients remain unclear and warrant further study
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nissen R (1956) A simple operation for control of reflux esophagitis. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 86:590–592PubMed Nissen R (1956) A simple operation for control of reflux esophagitis. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 86:590–592PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Shaheen NJ, Vaezi MF et al (2008) American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 135:1383–1391PubMedCrossRef Kahrilas PJ, Shaheen NJ, Vaezi MF et al (2008) American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 135:1383–1391PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Peters JH, DeMeester TR (1996) Indications, benefits and outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Dig Dis 14(3):169–179PubMedCrossRef Peters JH, DeMeester TR (1996) Indications, benefits and outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Dig Dis 14(3):169–179PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Salminen P (2009) The laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication—a better operation? Surgeon. 7(4):224–227PubMedCrossRef Salminen P (2009) The laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication—a better operation? Surgeon. 7(4):224–227PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference DeMeester TR et al (1986) Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 204(1):19–20CrossRef DeMeester TR et al (1986) Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 204(1):19–20CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Grande L et al (1994) Value of Nissen fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux judged by long-term symptom control. Br J Surg 81(4):548–550PubMedCrossRef Grande L et al (1994) Value of Nissen fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux judged by long-term symptom control. Br J Surg 81(4):548–550PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Booth et al (2002) Results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at 2–8 years after surgery. Br J Surg 89(4):476–481PubMedCrossRef Booth et al (2002) Results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at 2–8 years after surgery. Br J Surg 89(4):476–481PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Anvari M, Allen C (2003) Five-year comprehensive outcomes evaluation in 181 patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Am Coll Surg 196(1):51–57PubMedCrossRef Anvari M, Allen C (2003) Five-year comprehensive outcomes evaluation in 181 patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Am Coll Surg 196(1):51–57PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Stein HJ et al (1996) Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies. Am J Surg 171(1):36–39PubMedCrossRef Stein HJ et al (1996) Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies. Am J Surg 171(1):36–39PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dallemagne B et al (2011) Long-term results after laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux procedures. The British Journal of Surgery. 98(11):1581–1587PubMedCrossRef Dallemagne B et al (2011) Long-term results after laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux procedures. The British Journal of Surgery. 98(11):1581–1587PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Horgan et al (1999) Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations? Arch Surg 134(8):809–815PubMedCrossRef Horgan et al (1999) Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations? Arch Surg 134(8):809–815PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lafullarde T et al (2001) Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: five-year results and beyond. Arch Surg 136(2):180–184PubMedCrossRef Lafullarde T et al (2001) Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: five-year results and beyond. Arch Surg 136(2):180–184PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Byrne JP et al (2005) Symptomatic and functional outcome after laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 92(8):996–1001PubMedCrossRef Byrne JP et al (2005) Symptomatic and functional outcome after laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 92(8):996–1001PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Luostarinen ME et al (1993) Refundoplication for recurrent gastroesophageal reflux. World J Surg 17(5):587–593PubMedCrossRef Luostarinen ME et al (1993) Refundoplication for recurrent gastroesophageal reflux. World J Surg 17(5):587–593PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Mariette C et al (2011) Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25(9):2859–2864PubMedCrossRef Mariette C et al (2011) Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25(9):2859–2864PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Funch-Jensen P et al (2008) Complications and frequency of redo antireflux surgery in Denmark: a nationwide study, 1997–2005. Surg Endosc 22(3):627–630PubMedCrossRef Funch-Jensen P et al (2008) Complications and frequency of redo antireflux surgery in Denmark: a nationwide study, 1997–2005. Surg Endosc 22(3):627–630PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reoperation rates after laparoscopic fundoplication
Authors
Tianzan Zhou
Cristina Harnsberger
Ryan Broderick
Hans Fuchs
Mark Talamini
Garth Jacobsen
Santiago Horgan
David Chang
Bryan Sandler
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3660-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2015 Go to the issue