Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2017

01-03-2017

Clinical features of negative pathologic results after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Authors: Dong Il Jeong, Hyung Wook Kim, Cheol Woong Choi, Dae Hwan Kang, Su Bum Park, Su Jin Kim, Hyeong Seok Nam

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used for the treatment of gastric superficial neoplasms. Negative pathologic results after ESD can confuse the endoscopists and patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reasons for and the factors associated with negative pathologic results after ESD.

Patients and methods

From December 2008 to July 2015, a total of 1379 lesions diagnosed as definite dysplasia or adenocarcinoma by endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) were removed with an ESD procedure. The initial endoscopic and pathologic findings were analyzed.

Results

The incidence of negative pathology after ESD was 2.0 % (28/1379). Compared with positive pathologic lesions, negative pathologic lesions were smaller and had less surface area (P < 0.001). The reasons for negative pathologic lesions after ESD were complete removal by EFB (n = 20), over-estimations of the EFB specimen (n = 5), and different ESD site (n = 3).

Conclusion

Small tumor size and surface area are associated with negative pathologic results after ESD. When negative pathologic results are reported after ESD, we should review the previous endoscopic biopsy tissue specimen and compare the previous EFB site to the ESD site. Thereafter, regular endoscopic examination of the lesion is needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jeong O, Park YK (2011) Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer 11:69–77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeong O, Park YK (2011) Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer 11:69–77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Suh M, Choi KS, Lee YY, Jun JK (2013) Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004–2012. Cancer Res Treat 45:86–94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suh M, Choi KS, Lee YY, Jun JK (2013) Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004–2012. Cancer Res Treat 45:86–94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Correa P (1988) A human model of gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 48:3554–3560PubMed Correa P (1988) A human model of gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 48:3554–3560PubMed
4.
go back to reference Goldstein NS, Lewin KJ (1997) Gastric epithelial dysplasia and adenoma: historical review and histological criteria for grading. Hum Pathol 28:127–133CrossRefPubMed Goldstein NS, Lewin KJ (1997) Gastric epithelial dysplasia and adenoma: historical review and histological criteria for grading. Hum Pathol 28:127–133CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Park YM, Cho E, Kang HY, Kim JM (2011) The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25:2666–2677CrossRefPubMed Park YM, Cho E, Kang HY, Kim JM (2011) The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25:2666–2677CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Choi CW, Kim HW, Shin DH, Kang DH, Hong YM, Park JH, Park SB, Cho M, Lee JH (2014) The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia). Dig Dis Sci 59:421–427CrossRefPubMed Choi CW, Kim HW, Shin DH, Kang DH, Hong YM, Park JH, Park SB, Cho M, Lee JH (2014) The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia). Dig Dis Sci 59:421–427CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kato M, Nishida T, Tsutsui S, Komori M, Michida T, Yamamoto K, Kawai N, Kitamura S, Zushi S, Nishihara A, Nakanishi F, Kinoshita K, Yamada T, Iijima H, Tsujii M, Hayashi N (2011) Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group. J Gastroenterol 46:325–331CrossRefPubMed Kato M, Nishida T, Tsutsui S, Komori M, Michida T, Yamamoto K, Kawai N, Kitamura S, Zushi S, Nishihara A, Nakanishi F, Kinoshita K, Yamada T, Iijima H, Tsujii M, Hayashi N (2011) Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group. J Gastroenterol 46:325–331CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Choi JM, Kim SG, Yang HJ, Lim JH, Choi J, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2016) Clinical outcomes of no residual disease in the specimen after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30:610–618CrossRefPubMed Choi JM, Kim SG, Yang HJ, Lim JH, Choi J, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2016) Clinical outcomes of no residual disease in the specimen after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30:610–618CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Yang MJ, Shin SJ, Lee KS, Lee KM, Lim SG, Kang JK, Hwang JC, Kim SS, Lee D, Kim JS, Lee GH, Ryu HS, Yoo BM, Lee KJ, Kim YB, Kim JH (2015) Non-neoplastic pathology results after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial dysplasia or early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 47:598–604CrossRefPubMed Yang MJ, Shin SJ, Lee KS, Lee KM, Lim SG, Kang JK, Hwang JC, Kim SS, Lee D, Kim JS, Lee GH, Ryu HS, Yoo BM, Lee KJ, Kim YB, Kim JH (2015) Non-neoplastic pathology results after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial dysplasia or early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 47:598–604CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Inoue H, Kashida H, Kudo S, Sasako M, Shimoda T, Watanabe H, Yoshida S, Guelrud M, Lightdale CJ, Wang K, Riddell RH (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 58:S3–S43CrossRef Inoue H, Kashida H, Kudo S, Sasako M, Shimoda T, Watanabe H, Yoshida S, Guelrud M, Lightdale CJ, Wang K, Riddell RH (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 58:S3–S43CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, Dixon MF, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Fléjou JF, Geboes K, Hattori T, Hirota T, Itabashi M, Iwafuchi M, Iwashita A, Kim YI, Kirchner T, Klimpfinger M, Koike M, Lauwers GY, Lewin KJ, Oberhuber G, Offner F, Price AB, Rubio CA, Shimizu M, Shimoda T, Sipponen P, Solcia E, Stolte M, Watanabe H, Yamabe H (2000) The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 47:251–255CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, Dixon MF, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Fléjou JF, Geboes K, Hattori T, Hirota T, Itabashi M, Iwafuchi M, Iwashita A, Kim YI, Kirchner T, Klimpfinger M, Koike M, Lauwers GY, Lewin KJ, Oberhuber G, Offner F, Price AB, Rubio CA, Shimizu M, Shimoda T, Sipponen P, Solcia E, Stolte M, Watanabe H, Yamabe H (2000) The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 47:251–255CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Lee JH, Kim JG, Jung HK, Kim JH, Jeong WK, Jeon TJ, Kim JM, Kim YI, Ryu KW, Kong SH, Kim HI, Jung HY, Kim YS, Zang DY, Cho JY, Park JO, Lim do H, Jung ES, Ahn HS, Kim HJ (2014) Clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer in Korea: an evidence-based approach. J Gastric Cancer 14:87–104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee JH, Kim JG, Jung HK, Kim JH, Jeong WK, Jeon TJ, Kim JM, Kim YI, Ryu KW, Kong SH, Kim HI, Jung HY, Kim YS, Zang DY, Cho JY, Park JO, Lim do H, Jung ES, Ahn HS, Kim HJ (2014) Clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer in Korea: an evidence-based approach. J Gastric Cancer 14:87–104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, Kook MC, Park S, Ryu KW, Lee JH, Kim YW (2011) Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification. Endoscopy 43:465–471CrossRefPubMed Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, Kook MC, Park S, Ryu KW, Lee JH, Kim YW (2011) Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification. Endoscopy 43:465–471CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, Gyorkey F (1982) Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 82:228–231PubMed Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, Gyorkey F (1982) Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 82:228–231PubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical features of negative pathologic results after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
Authors
Dong Il Jeong
Hyung Wook Kim
Cheol Woong Choi
Dae Hwan Kang
Su Bum Park
Su Jin Kim
Hyeong Seok Nam
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5086-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2017 Go to the issue