Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2016

01-02-2016

Clinical outcomes of no residual disease in the specimen after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms

Authors: Ji Min Choi, Sang Gyun Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Joo Hyun Lim, Jeongmin Choi, Jong Pil Im, Joo Sung Kim, Woo Ho Kim, Hyun Chae Jung

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

No residual disease (NRD) can be found in the specimen after endoscopic resection (ER) of biopsy-proven gastric neoplasm. This study aimed to evaluate the endoscopic and pathologic characteristics of patients with NRD and identify the cause and long-term prognosis.

Methods

Medical records of patients who underwent ER for biopsy-proven gastric neoplasms at a single tertiary hospital between January 2005 and November 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients whose post-ER histology was revealed as NRD were included. Overall incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics, cause, and long-term prognosis were analyzed.

Results

NRD was detected in 143 (3.2 %) of 4401 cases of gastric neoplasms treated with ER. Mean endoscopic size of the initial lesion was 8.15 ± 6.64 mm; in 93 cases (65.0 %), the lesion was located in the lower third of the stomach. Initial pathologic diagnosis was as follows: adenoma (n = 110), carcinoma (n = 29), and atypical gland (n = 4). The causes of NRD were minute lesions removed by biopsy in 140 patients, pathologic misdiagnoses in two, and localization error in one. Local recurrence was detected in five patients (3.6 %) with minute lesions during follow-up and treated with argon plasma coagulation (n = 4) or re-ER (n = 1). Synchronous (n = 5, 3.6 %) and metachronous gastric lesions (n = 6, 4.3 %) were also detected during follow-up.

Conclusions

The main cause of NRD was minute lesions which might be completely removed by initial diagnostic biopsy. These cases showed a minimal rate of local recurrence and synchronous or metachronous gastric neoplasms. Careful follow-up is also mandatory for detection of residual disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, Freedman ND, Kamangar F (2014) Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:700–713PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, Freedman ND, Kamangar F (2014) Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:700–713PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
5.
go back to reference Tanaka M, Ono H, Hasuike N, Takizawa K (2008) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. Digestion 77(Suppl 1):23–28CrossRefPubMed Tanaka M, Ono H, Hasuike N, Takizawa K (2008) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. Digestion 77(Suppl 1):23–28CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, Kook MC, Park S, Ryu KW, Lee JH, Kim YW (2011) Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification. Endoscopy 43:465–471CrossRefPubMed Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, Kook MC, Park S, Ryu KW, Lee JH, Kim YW (2011) Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification. Endoscopy 43:465–471CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Choi CW, Kim HW, Shin DH, Kang DH, Hong YM, Park JH, Park SB, Cho M, Lee JH (2014) The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia). Dig Dis Sci 59:421–427CrossRefPubMed Choi CW, Kim HW, Shin DH, Kang DH, Hong YM, Park JH, Park SB, Cho M, Lee JH (2014) The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia). Dig Dis Sci 59:421–427CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kim ES, Jeon SW, Park SY, Park YD, Chung YJ, Yoon SJ, Lee SY, Park JY, Bae HI, Cho CM, Tak WY, Kweon YO, Kim SK, Choi YH (2009) Where has the tumor gone? The characteristics of cases of negative pathologic diagnosis after endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 41:739–745CrossRefPubMed Kim ES, Jeon SW, Park SY, Park YD, Chung YJ, Yoon SJ, Lee SY, Park JY, Bae HI, Cho CM, Tak WY, Kweon YO, Kim SK, Choi YH (2009) Where has the tumor gone? The characteristics of cases of negative pathologic diagnosis after endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 41:739–745CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kwon MJ, Park JJ, Yun JW, Noh HJ, Yoon DW, Chang WJ, Oh HY, Kim BH, Lee H, Joo MK, Lee BJ, Kim JH, Yeon JE, Kim JS, Byun KS, Bak YT (2012) Clinicopathologic features of cases with negative pathologic results after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Korean J Gastroenterol 59:211–217CrossRefPubMed Kwon MJ, Park JJ, Yun JW, Noh HJ, Yoon DW, Chang WJ, Oh HY, Kim BH, Lee H, Joo MK, Lee BJ, Kim JH, Yeon JE, Kim JS, Byun KS, Bak YT (2012) Clinicopathologic features of cases with negative pathologic results after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Korean J Gastroenterol 59:211–217CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Moertel CG (1977) Multiple primary malignant neoplasms: historical perspectives. Cancer 40:1786–1792CrossRefPubMed Moertel CG (1977) Multiple primary malignant neoplasms: historical perspectives. Cancer 40:1786–1792CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Participants in the Paris Workshop (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58:S3–43CrossRef Participants in the Paris Workshop (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58:S3–43CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ng TM, Fock KM, Khor JL, Teo EK, Sim CS, Tan AL, Machin D (2000) Non-steroidal anti-I nflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori and bleeding gastric ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14:203–209CrossRefPubMed Ng TM, Fock KM, Khor JL, Teo EK, Sim CS, Tan AL, Machin D (2000) Non-steroidal anti-I nflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori and bleeding gastric ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14:203–209CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2011) Endoscopic prediction of tumor invasion depth in early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 73:917–927CrossRefPubMed Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2011) Endoscopic prediction of tumor invasion depth in early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 73:917–927CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Inoue H, Takeshita K, Hori H, Muraoka Y, Yoneshima H, Endo M (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 39:58–62CrossRefPubMed Inoue H, Takeshita K, Hori H, Muraoka Y, Yoneshima H, Endo M (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 39:58–62CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Yang HJ, Kim SG, Lim JH, Choi J, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2014) Predictors of lymph node metastasis in patients with non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3780-7 Yang HJ, Kim SG, Lim JH, Choi J, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2014) Predictors of lymph node metastasis in patients with non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-014-3780-7
17.
go back to reference Yoon H, Kim SG, Choi J, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2013) Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1561–1568CrossRefPubMed Yoon H, Kim SG, Choi J, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2013) Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1561–1568CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, Ono H, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, Kato Y (2000) Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 3:219–225CrossRefPubMed Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, Ono H, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, Kato Y (2000) Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 3:219–225CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Muehldorfer SM, Stolte M, Martus P, Hahn EG, Ell C, Multicenter Study Group (2002) Diagnostic accuracy of forceps biopsy versus polypectomy for gastric polyps: a prospective multicentre study. Gut 50:465–470PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Muehldorfer SM, Stolte M, Martus P, Hahn EG, Ell C, Multicenter Study Group (2002) Diagnostic accuracy of forceps biopsy versus polypectomy for gastric polyps: a prospective multicentre study. Gut 50:465–470PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Genta RM, Rugge M (2006) Assessing risks for gastric cancer: new tools for pathologists. World J Gastroenterol 12:5622–5627PubMedCentralPubMed Genta RM, Rugge M (2006) Assessing risks for gastric cancer: new tools for pathologists. World J Gastroenterol 12:5622–5627PubMedCentralPubMed
21.
go back to reference Noffsinger A, Waxman I (2007) Preinvasive neoplasia in the stomach: diagnosis and treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1018–1023CrossRefPubMed Noffsinger A, Waxman I (2007) Preinvasive neoplasia in the stomach: diagnosis and treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1018–1023CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Choi MK, Kim GH, Park do Y, Song GA, Kim DU, Ryu DY, Lee BE, Cheong JH, Cho M (2013) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 27:4250–4258CrossRefPubMed Choi MK, Kim GH, Park do Y, Song GA, Kim DU, Ryu DY, Lee BE, Cheong JH, Cho M (2013) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 27:4250–4258CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jang MY, Cho JW, Oh WG, Ko SJ, Han SH, Baek HK, Lee YJ, Kim JW, Jung GM, Cho YK (2013) Clinicopathological characteristics of synchronous and metachronous gastric neoplasms after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Korean J Intern Med 28:687–693PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jang MY, Cho JW, Oh WG, Ko SJ, Han SH, Baek HK, Lee YJ, Kim JW, Jung GM, Cho YK (2013) Clinicopathological characteristics of synchronous and metachronous gastric neoplasms after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Korean J Intern Med 28:687–693PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cao D, Hafez M, Berg K, Murphy K, Epstein JI (2005) Little or no residual prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy: vanishing cancer or switched specimen?: a microsatellite analysis of specimen identity. Am J Surg Pathol 29:467–473CrossRefPubMed Cao D, Hafez M, Berg K, Murphy K, Epstein JI (2005) Little or no residual prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy: vanishing cancer or switched specimen?: a microsatellite analysis of specimen identity. Am J Surg Pathol 29:467–473CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical outcomes of no residual disease in the specimen after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms
Authors
Ji Min Choi
Sang Gyun Kim
Hyo-Joon Yang
Joo Hyun Lim
Jeongmin Choi
Jong Pil Im
Joo Sung Kim
Woo Ho Kim
Hyun Chae Jung
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4248-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2016 Go to the issue