Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2011

Open Access 01-07-2011

Day-to-day discrepancy in Bravo pH monitoring is related to the degree of deterioration of the lower esophageal sphincter and severity of reflux disease

Authors: Shahin Ayazi, Jeffrey A. Hagen, Joerg Zehetner, Farzaneh Banki, Florian Augustin, Ali Ayazi, Steven R. DeMeester, Daniel S. Oh, Helen J. Sohn, John C. Lipham, Tom R. DeMeester

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Bravo capsule allows monitoring of esophageal acid exposure over a two-day period. Experience has shown that 24–32% of patients will have abnormal esophageal acid exposure detected on only one of the 2 days monitored. This variation has been explained by the effect of endoscopy and sedation. The aim of this study was to assess the day-to-day discrepancy following transnasal placement of the Bravo capsule without endoscopy or sedation and to determine factors related to this variability.

Methods

Bravo pH monitoring was performed by transnasal placement of the capsule in 310 patients. Patients were divided into groups based on the composite pH score: both days normal, both days abnormal and only one of the 2 days abnormal. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics were compared between groups.

Results

Of the 310 patients evaluated, 60 (19%) showed a discrepancy between the 2 days. A total of 127 patients had a normal pH score on both days and 123 had an abnormal pH score on both days. Of the 60 patients with a discrepancy, 27 were abnormal the first day and 33 (55%) were abnormal the second day. Patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure on both days had higher degrees of esophageal acid exposure and were more likely to have a defective LES compared to those with an abnormal score on only one day (35 vs. 83%, p = 0.027).

Conclusion

Patients with a discrepancy between days of Bravo pH monitoring have lower esophageal acid exposure. Variability between the 2 days represents early deterioration of the gastroesophageal barrier and indicates less advanced reflux disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, Guardino JM, Chapman J, Kahrilas PJ (2003) Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 98(4):740–749PubMedCrossRef Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, Guardino JM, Chapman J, Kahrilas PJ (2003) Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 98(4):740–749PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tseng D, Rizvi AZ, Fennerty MB, Jobe BA, Diggs BS, Sheppard BC, Gross SC, Swanstrom LL, White NB, Aye RW, Hunter JG (2005) Forty-eight-hour pH monitoring increases sensitivity in detecting abnormal esophageal acid exposure. J Gastrointest Surg 9(8):1043–1051; discussion 1051–1052PubMedCrossRef Tseng D, Rizvi AZ, Fennerty MB, Jobe BA, Diggs BS, Sheppard BC, Gross SC, Swanstrom LL, White NB, Aye RW, Hunter JG (2005) Forty-eight-hour pH monitoring increases sensitivity in detecting abnormal esophageal acid exposure. J Gastrointest Surg 9(8):1043–1051; discussion 1051–1052PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ahlawat SK, Novak DJ, Williams DC, Maher KA, Barton F, Benjamin SB (2006) Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system. J Clin Gastroenterol 40(1):20–24PubMedCrossRef Ahlawat SK, Novak DJ, Williams DC, Maher KA, Barton F, Benjamin SB (2006) Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system. J Clin Gastroenterol 40(1):20–24PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bhat YM, McGrath KM, Bielefeldt K (2006) Wireless esophageal pH monitoring: new technique means new questions. J Clin Gastroenterol 40(2):116–121PubMedCrossRef Bhat YM, McGrath KM, Bielefeldt K (2006) Wireless esophageal pH monitoring: new technique means new questions. J Clin Gastroenterol 40(2):116–121PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wiener GJ, Morgan TM, Copper JB, Wu WC, Castell DO, Sinclair JW, Richter JE (1998) Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci 33(9):1127–1133 Wiener GJ, Morgan TM, Copper JB, Wu WC, Castell DO, Sinclair JW, Richter JE (1998) Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci 33(9):1127–1133
6.
go back to reference Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W, Johansson KE, Cheng SC (1988) The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg 155(1):104–111PubMedCrossRef Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W, Johansson KE, Cheng SC (1988) The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg 155(1):104–111PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ayazi S, Hagen JA, Chan LS, DeMeester SR, Lin MW, Ayazi A, Leers JM, Oezcelik A, Banki F, Lipham JC, DeMeester TR, Crookes PF (2009) Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux: quantifying the association between body mass index, esophageal acid exposure, and lower esophageal sphincter status in a large series of patients with reflux symptoms. J Gastrointest Surg 13(8):1440–1447PubMedCrossRef Ayazi S, Hagen JA, Chan LS, DeMeester SR, Lin MW, Ayazi A, Leers JM, Oezcelik A, Banki F, Lipham JC, DeMeester TR, Crookes PF (2009) Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux: quantifying the association between body mass index, esophageal acid exposure, and lower esophageal sphincter status in a large series of patients with reflux symptoms. J Gastrointest Surg 13(8):1440–1447PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ayazi S, Leers JM, Oezcelik A, Abate E, Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Banki F, Lipham JC, DeMeester TR, Crookes PF (2009) Measurement of gastric pH in ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Surg Endosc 23(9):1968–1973PubMedCrossRef Ayazi S, Leers JM, Oezcelik A, Abate E, Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Banki F, Lipham JC, DeMeester TR, Crookes PF (2009) Measurement of gastric pH in ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Surg Endosc 23(9):1968–1973PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fass R, Hell R, Sampliner RE, Pulliam G, Graver E, Hartz V, Johnson C, Jaffe P (1999) Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities. Dig Dis Sci 44(11):2263–2269PubMedCrossRef Fass R, Hell R, Sampliner RE, Pulliam G, Graver E, Hartz V, Johnson C, Jaffe P (1999) Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities. Dig Dis Sci 44(11):2263–2269PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ayazi S, Lipham JC, Portale G, Peyre CG, Streets CG, Leers JM, Demeester SR, Banki F, Chan LS, Hagen JA, Demeester TR (2009) Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring: normal values, concordance, optimal diagnostic thresholds, and accuracy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(1):60–67PubMedCrossRef Ayazi S, Lipham JC, Portale G, Peyre CG, Streets CG, Leers JM, Demeester SR, Banki F, Chan LS, Hagen JA, Demeester TR (2009) Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring: normal values, concordance, optimal diagnostic thresholds, and accuracy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(1):60–67PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bechtold ML, Holly JS, Thaler K, Marshall JB (2007) Bravo (wireless) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: How do day 1 and day 2 results compare? World J Gastroenterol 13(30):4091–4095PubMed Bechtold ML, Holly JS, Thaler K, Marshall JB (2007) Bravo (wireless) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: How do day 1 and day 2 results compare? World J Gastroenterol 13(30):4091–4095PubMed
Metadata
Title
Day-to-day discrepancy in Bravo pH monitoring is related to the degree of deterioration of the lower esophageal sphincter and severity of reflux disease
Authors
Shahin Ayazi
Jeffrey A. Hagen
Joerg Zehetner
Farzaneh Banki
Florian Augustin
Ali Ayazi
Steven R. DeMeester
Daniel S. Oh
Helen J. Sohn
John C. Lipham
Tom R. DeMeester
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1529-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2011 Go to the issue