Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2011

01-07-2011

Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy more challenging in male patients?

Authors: Peter Ambe, Babak Janghorban Esfahani, Ibrahim Tasci, Hildegard Christ, Lothar Köhler

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) seems to be more challenging in males than in females. The surgery seems to be longer in male patients. There also seems to be an increased rate of conversion to open surgery in male patients. We sought to objectively verify this widespread belief.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between January 2004 and November 2009 in our hospital. Within this period 1844 cholecystectomies were performed in our community-based hospital. After a strict inclusion procedure, 1571 cases of LC for symptomatic gallbladder disease were analyzed (501 males, 1071 females). The time for surgery, defined as the interval from placement of the Veress needle to wound closure in minutes, and the rate of conversion to open surgery were the main parameters considered.

Results

The time for surgery in male patients was significantly longer compared to that for females (p < 0.0001). The male cohort was significantly older than the female cohort at the time of surgery (p < 0.001). The rate of conversion to open surgery was significantly higher in male patients (5.6%) compared to 2.9% for females (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Based on our analysis, LC had a significantly longer duration of surgery in the male cohort. The rate of conversion to open surgery was also significantly higher in male cohort. Thus, LC could be more challenging in male patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Attili F, Carulli N, Roda E, Barbara B, Capocaccia L, Menotti A, Okoliksanyi L, Ricci G, Capocaccia R, Festi D, Lalloni L, Mariotti S, Sama C, Scafato E, M.I.COL Group (1995) Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Italy: prevalence data of the Multicenter Italian Study on Cholelithiasis (M.I.COL). Am J Epidemiol 141(2):158–165PubMed Attili F, Carulli N, Roda E, Barbara B, Capocaccia L, Menotti A, Okoliksanyi L, Ricci G, Capocaccia R, Festi D, Lalloni L, Mariotti S, Sama C, Scafato E, M.I.COL Group (1995) Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Italy: prevalence data of the Multicenter Italian Study on Cholelithiasis (M.I.COL). Am J Epidemiol 141(2):158–165PubMed
2.
go back to reference Acalovschi M (2001) Cholesterol gallstones: from epidemiology to prevention. Postgrad Med J 77(906):221–229PubMedCrossRef Acalovschi M (2001) Cholesterol gallstones: from epidemiology to prevention. Postgrad Med J 77(906):221–229PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bateson MC (2000) Gallstones and cholecystectomy in modern Britain. Postgrad Med J 76(901):700–703PubMedCrossRef Bateson MC (2000) Gallstones and cholecystectomy in modern Britain. Postgrad Med J 76(901):700–703PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shaffer EA (2005) Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7:132–140PubMedCrossRef Shaffer EA (2005) Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7:132–140PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Balzer K, Goebell H, Breuer N, Rüping KW, Leder LD (1986) Epidemiology of gallstones in a German industrial town (Essen) from 1940–1975. Digestion 33:189–197PubMedCrossRef Balzer K, Goebell H, Breuer N, Rüping KW, Leder LD (1986) Epidemiology of gallstones in a German industrial town (Essen) from 1940–1975. Digestion 33:189–197PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Diehl AK (1991) Epidemiology and natural history of gallstone disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 20(1):1–19PubMed Diehl AK (1991) Epidemiology and natural history of gallstone disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 20(1):1–19PubMed
7.
go back to reference Heaton KW, Braddon FE, Mountford RA, Hughes AO, Emmett PM (1991) Symptomatic and silent gall stones in the community. Gut 32:316–320PubMedCrossRef Heaton KW, Braddon FE, Mountford RA, Hughes AO, Emmett PM (1991) Symptomatic and silent gall stones in the community. Gut 32:316–320PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Afdhal NH (2007) Diseases of the gallbladder and bile ducts. In: Goldman L, Ausiello D (eds) Cecil textbook of medicine, 23rd edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, Chap 159, pp 1152–1164 Afdhal NH (2007) Diseases of the gallbladder and bile ducts. In: Goldman L, Ausiello D (eds) Cecil textbook of medicine, 23rd edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, Chap 159, pp 1152–1164
10.
go back to reference Fink-Bennett D, Freitas JE, Ripley SD, Bree RL (1985) The sensitivity of hepatobiliary imaging and real-time ultrasonography in the detection of acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg 120:904–906PubMed Fink-Bennett D, Freitas JE, Ripley SD, Bree RL (1985) The sensitivity of hepatobiliary imaging and real-time ultrasonography in the detection of acute cholecystitis. Arch Surg 120:904–906PubMed
11.
go back to reference Miller DR, Egbert RM, Braunstein P (1984) Comparison of ultrasound and hepatobiliary imaging in the early detection of acute total common bile duct obstruction. Arch Surg 119:1233–1237PubMed Miller DR, Egbert RM, Braunstein P (1984) Comparison of ultrasound and hepatobiliary imaging in the early detection of acute total common bile duct obstruction. Arch Surg 119:1233–1237PubMed
12.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Cholecystectomy versus no cholecystectomy in patients with silent gallstones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006230PubMed Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Cholecystectomy versus no cholecystectomy in patients with silent gallstones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006230PubMed
13.
go back to reference Rehfuss ME (1936) Medical treatment of gall bladder disease. Am J Dig Dis 3(1):66–68 Rehfuss ME (1936) Medical treatment of gall bladder disease. Am J Dig Dis 3(1):66–68
14.
go back to reference Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahanson J, Matter I (1997) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystits. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7(5):407–414PubMedCrossRef Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahanson J, Matter I (1997) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystits. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7(5):407–414PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chang TC, Lin MT, Wu MH, Wang MY, Lee PH (2009) Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 56(89):26–28PubMed Chang TC, Lin MT, Wu MH, Wang MY, Lee PH (2009) Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 56(89):26–28PubMed
16.
go back to reference Keus F, Gooszen HG, Van Laarhoven CJ (2009) Systematic review: open, small-incision or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29(4):359–378PubMedCrossRef Keus F, Gooszen HG, Van Laarhoven CJ (2009) Systematic review: open, small-incision or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29(4):359–378PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD006231 Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD006231
18.
go back to reference Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24(6):1403–1412PubMedCrossRef Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24(6):1403–1412PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ponsky TA (2009) Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques. J Am Coll Surg 209(5):e1–e6PubMedCrossRef Ponsky TA (2009) Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques. J Am Coll Surg 209(5):e1–e6PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) From single-port access to laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24(1):234–235PubMedCrossRef Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) From single-port access to laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24(1):234–235PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Salinas G, Saavedra L, Agurto H, Quispe R, Ramírez E, Grande J, Tamayo J, Sánchez V, Málaga D, Marks JM (2010) Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24(5):1092–1098PubMedCrossRef Salinas G, Saavedra L, Agurto H, Quispe R, Ramírez E, Grande J, Tamayo J, Sánchez V, Málaga D, Marks JM (2010) Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24(5):1092–1098PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schlager A, Khalaileh A, Shussman N, Elazary R, Keidar A, Pikarsky AJ, Ben-Shushan A, Shibolet O, Horgan S, Talamini M, Zamir G, Rivkind AI, Mintz Y (2010) Providing more through less: current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24(7):1542–1546PubMedCrossRef Schlager A, Khalaileh A, Shussman N, Elazary R, Keidar A, Pikarsky AJ, Ben-Shushan A, Shibolet O, Horgan S, Talamini M, Zamir G, Rivkind AI, Mintz Y (2010) Providing more through less: current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24(7):1542–1546PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mann HB, Withney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of 2 random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 18:50–61CrossRef Mann HB, Withney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of 2 random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 18:50–61CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ibrahim S, Hean TK, Ho LS, Ravintharan T, Chye TN, Chee CH (2006) Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 30(9):1698–1704PubMedCrossRef Ibrahim S, Hean TK, Ho LS, Ravintharan T, Chye TN, Chee CH (2006) Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 30(9):1698–1704PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pavlidis TE, Marakis GN, Symeonidis N, Psarras K, Ballas K, Rafailidis S, Sakantamis AK (2008) Considerations concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(1):56–60PubMedCrossRef Pavlidis TE, Marakis GN, Symeonidis N, Psarras K, Ballas K, Rafailidis S, Sakantamis AK (2008) Considerations concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(1):56–60PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Annamaneni RK, Moraitis D, Cayten CG (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. JSLS 9(4):408–410PubMed Annamaneni RK, Moraitis D, Cayten CG (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. JSLS 9(4):408–410PubMed
27.
go back to reference Al-Mulhim AA (2008) Male gender is not a risk factor for the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single surgeon experience. Saudi J Gastroenterol 14(2):73–79PubMedCrossRef Al-Mulhim AA (2008) Male gender is not a risk factor for the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single surgeon experience. Saudi J Gastroenterol 14(2):73–79PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yol S, Kartal A, Vatansev C, Aksoy F, Toy H (2006) Sex as a factor in conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. JSLS 10(3):359–363PubMed Yol S, Kartal A, Vatansev C, Aksoy F, Toy H (2006) Sex as a factor in conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. JSLS 10(3):359–363PubMed
Metadata
Title
Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy more challenging in male patients?
Authors
Peter Ambe
Babak Janghorban Esfahani
Ibrahim Tasci
Hildegard Christ
Lothar Köhler
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1539-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2011 Go to the issue