Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2009

01-09-2009

Measurement of gastric pH in ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring

Authors: Shahin Ayazi, Jessica M. Leers, Arzu Oezcelik, Emmanuele Abate, Christian G. Peyre, Jeffrey A. Hagen, Steven R. DeMeester, Farzaneh Banki, John C. Lipham, Tom R. DeMeester, Peter F. Crookes

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is the method used most widely to quantify gastroesophageal reflux. The degree of gastroesophageal reflux may potentially be underestimated if the resting gastric pH is high. Normal subjects and symptomatic patients undergoing 24-h pH monitoring were studied to determine whether a relationship exists between resting gastric pH and the degree of esophageal acid exposure.

Methods

Normal volunteers (n = 54) and symptomatic patients without prior gastric surgery and off medication (n = 1,582) were studied. Gastric pH was measured by advancing the pH catheter into the stomach before positioning the electrode in the esophagus. The normal range of gastric pH was defined from the normal subjects, and the patients then were classified as having either normal gastric pH or hypochlorhydria. Esophageal acid exposure was compared between the two groups.

Results

The normal range for gastric pH was 0.3–2.9. The median age of the 1,582 patients was 51 years, and their median gastric pH was 1.7. Abnormal esophageal acid exposure was found in 797 patients (50.3%). Hypochlorhydria (resting gastric pH >2.9) was detected in 176 patients (11%). There was an inverse relationship between gastric pH and esophageal acid exposure (r = −0.13). For the patients with positive 24-h pH test results, the major effect of gastric pH was that the hypochlorhydric patients tended to have more reflux in the supine position than those with normal gastric pH.

Conclusion

There is an inverse, dose-dependent relationship between gastric pH and esophageal acid exposure. Negative 24-h esophageal pH test results for a patient with hypochlorhydria may prompt a search for nonacid reflux as the explanation for the patient’s symptoms.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shaheen NJ, Hansen RA, Morgan DR, Gangarosa LM, Ringel Y, Thiny MT, Russo MW, Sandler RS (2006) The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2128–2138PubMedCrossRef Shaheen NJ, Hansen RA, Morgan DR, Gangarosa LM, Ringel Y, Thiny MT, Russo MW, Sandler RS (2006) The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2128–2138PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lundell L (2007) Therapy of gastroesophageal reflux: evidence-based approach to antireflux surgery. Dig Dis 25:188–196PubMedCrossRef Lundell L (2007) Therapy of gastroesophageal reflux: evidence-based approach to antireflux surgery. Dig Dis 25:188–196PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, Cui H, Fass R (2003) Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD)—acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:537–545PubMedCrossRef Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, Cui H, Fass R (2003) Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD)—acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:537–545PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W (1988) The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg 155:104–111PubMedCrossRef Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W (1988) The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg 155:104–111PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Streets CG, DeMeester TR (2002) Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: why, when, and what to do. J Clin Gastroenterol 37:14–22CrossRef Streets CG, DeMeester TR (2002) Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: why, when, and what to do. J Clin Gastroenterol 37:14–22CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Castell DO (1999) My approach to the difficult GERD patient. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:S17–S23PubMedCrossRef Castell DO (1999) My approach to the difficult GERD patient. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:S17–S23PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Leite LP, Just RJ, Castell DO (1995) Control of gastric acid with high-dose H2-receptor antagonists after omeprazole failure: report of two cases. Am J Gastroenterol 90:1874–1877PubMed Leite LP, Just RJ, Castell DO (1995) Control of gastric acid with high-dose H2-receptor antagonists after omeprazole failure: report of two cases. Am J Gastroenterol 90:1874–1877PubMed
8.
go back to reference Fimmel CJ (1985) Long-term ambulatory gastric pH monitoring: validation of a new method and effect of H2-antagonists. Gastroenterology 88:1842–1851PubMed Fimmel CJ (1985) Long-term ambulatory gastric pH monitoring: validation of a new method and effect of H2-antagonists. Gastroenterology 88:1842–1851PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fisher RS (1997) Regional differences in gastric acidity and antacid distribution: is a single pH electrode enough? Am J Gastroenterol 92:263–270PubMed Fisher RS (1997) Regional differences in gastric acidity and antacid distribution: is a single pH electrode enough? Am J Gastroenterol 92:263–270PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cilluffo T, Armstrong D, Castiglione F et al (1990) Reproducibility of ambulatory gastric pH recordings in the corpus and antrum. Scand J Gastroenterol 25:1076–1083PubMedCrossRef Cilluffo T, Armstrong D, Castiglione F et al (1990) Reproducibility of ambulatory gastric pH recordings in the corpus and antrum. Scand J Gastroenterol 25:1076–1083PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Prewett EJ, Smith JTL, Nwokolo CU et al (1991) Twenty-four-hour intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin concentration profiles in female and male subjects. Clin Sci 80:619–624PubMed Prewett EJ, Smith JTL, Nwokolo CU et al (1991) Twenty-four-hour intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin concentration profiles in female and male subjects. Clin Sci 80:619–624PubMed
12.
go back to reference Zerbib F, Roman S, Ropert A, des Varannes SB, Pouderoux P, Chaput U, Mion F, Vérin E, Galmiche JP, Sifrim D (2006) Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1956–1963PubMedCrossRef Zerbib F, Roman S, Ropert A, des Varannes SB, Pouderoux P, Chaput U, Mion F, Vérin E, Galmiche JP, Sifrim D (2006) Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1956–1963PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, Tutuian R, Katz PO, Castell DO (2001) Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 120:1599–1606PubMedCrossRef Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, Tutuian R, Katz PO, Castell DO (2001) Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 120:1599–1606PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measurement of gastric pH in ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring
Authors
Shahin Ayazi
Jessica M. Leers
Arzu Oezcelik
Emmanuele Abate
Christian G. Peyre
Jeffrey A. Hagen
Steven R. DeMeester
Farzaneh Banki
John C. Lipham
Tom R. DeMeester
Peter F. Crookes
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0218-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2009 Go to the issue