Published in:
01-10-2015
Prognostic Value of Biomarkers in Acute Non-massive Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Authors:
Anurag Bajaj, Parul Rathor, Vishal Sehgal, Besher Kabak, Ajay Shetty, Ossama Al Masalmeh, Srikanth Hosur
Published in:
Lung
|
Issue 5/2015
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Various biomarkers have been evaluated to risk stratify patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). We aimed to summarize the available evidence to compare the prognostic value of three most widely studied biomarkers in normotensive patients with acute PE.
Method
A systematic literature review of database, including Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane, was done. Studies were included if those were done on patients with acute PE and serum troponin or brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal proBNP (BNP/NT-proBNP) or Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) assay was done. The primary end point was short-term all-cause mortality. The secondary end points were PE-related mortality and serious adverse events.
Results
All three biomarkers were significantly associated with increased risk for short-term all-cause mortality, PE-related mortality and serious adverse events. All-cause mortality: troponin [odds ratio (OR) 4.80; 95 % CI 3.25–7.08, I
2 = 54 %], BNP or NT-proBNP (OR 7.98; 95 % CI 4.34–14.67, I
2 = 0 %); PE-related mortality: troponin (OR 3.80; 95 % CI 2.74–5.27, I
2 = 0 %), BNP or NT-proBNP (OR 7.57; 95 % CI 2.89–19.81, I
2 = 0 %) and H-FABP (OR 25.97; 95 % CI 6.63–101.66, I
2 = 40 %). H-FABP has the lowest negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.17 for mortality followed by high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) with NLR of 0.21.
Conclusion
None of the biomarker identifies a subgroup of patients who can be managed as an outpatient versus patients who may get benefit from thrombolytics with certainty; however, H-FABP and hs-cTnT showed some promising results and should be investigated further.