Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Knee Arthroplasty

Osteodensitometry measurements of periprosthetic bone using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry following total knee arthroplasty

Authors: C. Windisch, B. Windisch, W. Kolb, K. Kolb, P. Grützner, A. Roth

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The present study investigates the reaction of bone density as well as the possible factors influencing this reaction following a cement-free total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Materials and methods

Osteodensitometry scan data from 50 prospective patients with TKA was evaluated. The patients were split into two groups according to the number of follow-up investigations undertaken. No patient included in the study had received medication to increase bone density. To identify the changes in periprosthetic bone density, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone density measurements in defined regions of interest (ROI) were performed over a period of 24 months postoperative. The test parameters included gender, severity of arthrosis, as well as the metric parameters T-score, body mass index, cortical bone marrow index, and the varus alignment for the respective patient.

Results

The most significant changes in bone density were recorded within the first 3 months postoperative, in particular, the highest bone density loss was found in the region of the proximal medial tibia. Moreover, significant gender-specific associations regarding changes in bone density were established.

Conclusion

Finally, results achieved in the present study demonstrate that the fundamental classification in defined ROI proved to be functional and effective.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barnett E, Nordin BE (1959) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11:166–174CrossRef Barnett E, Nordin BE (1959) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11:166–174CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kanis JA (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4(6):368–381PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4(6):368–381PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Soininvaara TA, Miettinen HJA, Jurvelin JS et al (2004) Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty. One-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:600–605PubMedCrossRef Soininvaara TA, Miettinen HJA, Jurvelin JS et al (2004) Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty. One-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:600–605PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Regner LR, Carlson LV, Karrholm JN et al (1999) Bone mineral and migratory patterns in uncemented total knee arthroplasties: a randomized 5-year follow up study of 38 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 70:603–608PubMedCrossRef Regner LR, Carlson LV, Karrholm JN et al (1999) Bone mineral and migratory patterns in uncemented total knee arthroplasties: a randomized 5-year follow up study of 38 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 70:603–608PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Petersen MM, Lauritzen LB, Pedersen JG et al (1996) Decreased bone density of the distal femur after uncemented knee arthroplasty. A 1-year follow-up of 29 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 67:339–344PubMedCrossRef Petersen MM, Lauritzen LB, Pedersen JG et al (1996) Decreased bone density of the distal femur after uncemented knee arthroplasty. A 1-year follow-up of 29 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 67:339–344PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Abu-Rajab RB, Watson WS, Walker B, Roberts J, Gallacher SJ, Meek RM (2006) Periprosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. Cemented versus cementless fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:606–613PubMedCrossRef Abu-Rajab RB, Watson WS, Walker B, Roberts J, Gallacher SJ, Meek RM (2006) Periprosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. Cemented versus cementless fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:606–613PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Spittelhouse AJ, Getty CJ, Eastell R (1999) Measurement of bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry around an uncemented knee prothesis. J Arthroplasty 14:957–963CrossRef Spittelhouse AJ, Getty CJ, Eastell R (1999) Measurement of bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry around an uncemented knee prothesis. J Arthroplasty 14:957–963CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Karbowski A, Schwitalle M, Eckardt A et al (1999) Periprosthetic bone remodelling after total knee arthroplasty: early assessment by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 199(5–6):324–326CrossRef Karbowski A, Schwitalle M, Eckardt A et al (1999) Periprosthetic bone remodelling after total knee arthroplasty: early assessment by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 199(5–6):324–326CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hennings T, Arabmotlagh M, Schwarz A, Zichner L (2002) Dosedependent prevention of early peri-prosthetic bone loss by aledronate. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 140:42–46CrossRef Hennings T, Arabmotlagh M, Schwarz A, Zichner L (2002) Dosedependent prevention of early peri-prosthetic bone loss by aledronate. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 140:42–46CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Minoda Y, Ikebuchi M, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Inori F, Nakamura H (2010) A cemented mobile-bearing total knee replacement prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density around the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:794–798 Minoda Y, Ikebuchi M, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Inori F, Nakamura H (2010) A cemented mobile-bearing total knee replacement prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density around the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:794–798
11.
go back to reference Petersen MM, Nielsen PT, Lauritzen LB et al (1995) Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 25 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 66:513–516PubMedCrossRef Petersen MM, Nielsen PT, Lauritzen LB et al (1995) Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 25 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 66:513–516PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Au AG, James Raso V, Liggins AB, Amirfazli A (2007) Contribution of loading conditions and material properties to stress shielding near the tibial component of total knee replacements. J Biomech 40:1410–1416PubMedCrossRef Au AG, James Raso V, Liggins AB, Amirfazli A (2007) Contribution of loading conditions and material properties to stress shielding near the tibial component of total knee replacements. J Biomech 40:1410–1416PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Li MG, Nilsson KG (2000) Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of 28 knees using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Orthop Res 18:40–47PubMedCrossRef Li MG, Nilsson KG (2000) Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of 28 knees using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Orthop Res 18:40–47PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Munro JT, Pandit S, Walker CG, Clatworthy M, Pitto RP (2010) Loss of tibial bone density in patients with rotating- or fixed platform TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:775–781PubMedCrossRef Munro JT, Pandit S, Walker CG, Clatworthy M, Pitto RP (2010) Loss of tibial bone density in patients with rotating- or fixed platform TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:775–781PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Osteodensitometry measurements of periprosthetic bone using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry following total knee arthroplasty
Authors
C. Windisch
B. Windisch
W. Kolb
K. Kolb
P. Grützner
A. Roth
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1601-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 11/2012 Go to the issue