Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2011

01-12-2011 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Results of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®): a single-centre study of 56 consecutive patients

Authors: Bakir Kadum, Nader Mafi, Sigge Norberg, Arkan S. Sayed-Noor

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 12/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shoulder arthroplasty surgery has undergone remarkable progress. New concepts like reverse and stemless shoulder prostheses have been widely used. The Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) is a new innovative system that provides the surgeon with different prosthetic versions. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate our short-term results and complications of the TESS.

Patients and methods

56 consecutive patients were operated with one of the two versions of TESS (anatomical or reverse) between October 2007 and December 2009. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation of the function and life quality was achieved by the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) index and EQ-5D self-report questionnaire, respectively. Radiographic follow-up by anteroposterior, axillary and lateral views was done. The anterosuperior approach was used in all cases. We compared the outcome in fracture patients with other categories.

Results

49 patients were available for 9–24 months (mean 14) clinical and radiographic postoperative follow-up. The mean of quick DASH improved from 56 preoperatively to 34 postoperatively (p < 0.001) and EQ-5D from 0.36 preoperatively to 0.73 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The complications were few and we had no radiolucencies or scapular notching during the study period. Fracture patients did worse compared to other categories.

Conclusions

TESS prosthesis showed promising short-term results with few complications. The reverse version could be implanted without stem if initial stability was adequate. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm the results of this innovative system in the long run.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Walsh G, Boileaue P (1999) Prosthetic adaptability: a new concept for shoulder arthroplasty. J Should Elbow Surg 8:443–451CrossRef Walsh G, Boileaue P (1999) Prosthetic adaptability: a new concept for shoulder arthroplasty. J Should Elbow Surg 8:443–451CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Robertson DD, Yuan J, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Yamaguchi K (2000) The three dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82-A:1594–1602 Robertson DD, Yuan J, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Yamaguchi K (2000) The three dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82-A:1594–1602
3.
go back to reference Boileau P, Sinnerton RJ, Chuinard C, Walch G (2006) Arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88-B:562–575CrossRef Boileau P, Sinnerton RJ, Chuinard C, Walch G (2006) Arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88-B:562–575CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr (2006) Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(10):2279–2292CrossRef Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr (2006) Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(10):2279–2292CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chin PYK, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Schleck C (2006) Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different? J Should Elbow Surg 15(1):19–22CrossRef Chin PYK, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Schleck C (2006) Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different? J Should Elbow Surg 15(1):19–22CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Farng E, Zingmond D, Krenek L, SooHoo N (2011) Factors predicting complication rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Should Elbow Surg 20(4):557–563CrossRef Farng E, Zingmond D, Krenek L, SooHoo N (2011) Factors predicting complication rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Should Elbow Surg 20(4):557–563CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Movin T, Sjödén GO, Ahrengart L (1998) Poor function after shoulder replacement in fracture patients. A retrospective evaluation of 29 patients followed 2–12 years. Acta Orthop Scand 69:392–396PubMedCrossRef Movin T, Sjödén GO, Ahrengart L (1998) Poor function after shoulder replacement in fracture patients. A retrospective evaluation of 29 patients followed 2–12 years. Acta Orthop Scand 69:392–396PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Walch G, Boileau P, Noel E (2010) Shoulder arthroplasty: evolving techniques and indications. Jt Bone Spine 77(6):501–505CrossRef Walch G, Boileau P, Noel E (2010) Shoulder arthroplasty: evolving techniques and indications. Jt Bone Spine 77(6):501–505CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Burgess DL, McGarth MS, Bonutti PM, Marker DR, Delanois RE, Mont MA (2009) Current concepts review: shoulder resurfacing. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:1228–1238CrossRef Burgess DL, McGarth MS, Bonutti PM, Marker DR, Delanois RE, Mont MA (2009) Current concepts review: shoulder resurfacing. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:1228–1238CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mackenzie DB (1993) The antero-superior exposure for total shoulder replacement. Orthop Traumatol 2:690–700CrossRef Mackenzie DB (1993) The antero-superior exposure for total shoulder replacement. Orthop Traumatol 2:690–700CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Huguet D, Rio B, Tessier J, Zippoli B, TESS le groupe (2009) Humeral prosthesis without stem: preliminary results at more than 2 years follow-up. Revue de chiruegie orthopédique et traumatologique 95S:97–100CrossRef Huguet D, Rio B, Tessier J, Zippoli B, TESS le groupe (2009) Humeral prosthesis without stem: preliminary results at more than 2 years follow-up. Revue de chiruegie orthopédique et traumatologique 95S:97–100CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Huguet D, DeClercq G, Rio B, Tessier J, Zippoli B, The TESS group (2010) Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: radiographic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years’ follow-up. J Should Elbow Surg 19:847–852CrossRef Huguet D, DeClercq G, Rio B, Tessier J, Zippoli B, The TESS group (2010) Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: radiographic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years’ follow-up. J Should Elbow Surg 19:847–852CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kempton LB, Ankerson E, Wiater JM (2010) A complication-based learning curve from 200 reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res (Epub ahead of print) Kempton LB, Ankerson E, Wiater JM (2010) A complication-based learning curve from 200 reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res (Epub ahead of print)
14.
go back to reference Gerber C, Pennington SD, Nyffeler RW (2009) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:284–295PubMed Gerber C, Pennington SD, Nyffeler RW (2009) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:284–295PubMed
15.
go back to reference Roche C, Flurin PH, Wright T, Crosby LA, Mauldin M, Zuckerman JD (2009) An evaluation of the relationships between reverse shoulder design parameters and range of motion, impingement, and stability. J Should Elbow Surg 18:734–741CrossRef Roche C, Flurin PH, Wright T, Crosby LA, Mauldin M, Zuckerman JD (2009) An evaluation of the relationships between reverse shoulder design parameters and range of motion, impingement, and stability. J Should Elbow Surg 18:734–741CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gutierrez S, Levy JC, Frankle MA, Cuff D, Keller TS, Pupello DR, Lee WE 3rd (2008) Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model. J Should Elbow Surg 17:608–615CrossRef Gutierrez S, Levy JC, Frankle MA, Cuff D, Keller TS, Pupello DR, Lee WE 3rd (2008) Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model. J Should Elbow Surg 17:608–615CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nicholson GP, Strauss EJ, Sherman SL (2010) Scapular notching: recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact. Clin Orthop Related Res (Epub ahead of print) Nicholson GP, Strauss EJ, Sherman SL (2010) Scapular notching: recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact. Clin Orthop Related Res (Epub ahead of print)
18.
go back to reference Molé DWein F, Déaly C, Valenti P, Sirveaux F (2011) The anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Related Res (Epub ahead of print) Molé DWein F, Déaly C, Valenti P, Sirveaux F (2011) The anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Related Res (Epub ahead of print)
Metadata
Title
Results of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®): a single-centre study of 56 consecutive patients
Authors
Bakir Kadum
Nader Mafi
Sigge Norberg
Arkan S. Sayed-Noor
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 12/2011
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1368-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2011

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2011 Go to the issue