Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Topic Paper

Multiparametric ultrasound-targeted biopsy compares favorably to multiparametric MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy on initial biopsy of men at risk for prostate cancer

Author: Pat F. Fulgham

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose this study is to evaluate the efficacy of multiparametric ultrasound-targeted biopsies in patients undergoing initial biopsy of the prostate for the suspicion of prostate cancer.

Materials and methods

A total of 167 patients who are biopsy naïve underwent multiparametric ultrasound-targeted biopsy of the prostate. All patients had a transrectal ultrasound which included gray-scale evaluation and color Doppler evaluation. 12-core biopsies were performed on all patients, based on sextant anatomy; however, all cores were directed toward visually abnormal areas of the prostate as identified by multiparametric ultrasound, when such areas were present.

Results

Of 167 patients undergoing biopsy, a total of 111 (66.5%) were positive for cancer. Of these, 78 (70.3%) had a Gleason grade ≥ 7 and 33 (29.7%) had a Gleason grade ≤ 6. Of those undergoing radical prostatectomy 29 of 38 (76.3%) had biopsy Gleason grade ≥ 7, while nine of 38 (23.7%) had a Gleason grade ≤ 6. Only four of 38 (10.5%) patients who had final pathologic staging underwent surgical therapy for disease of low-malignant potential (Gleason ≤ 6).

Conclusion

On initial biopsy for prostate cancer, multiparametric ultrasound-targeted biopsy compares favorably to the published performance of multiparametric MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy in terms of positive biopsy rate and the detection of disease of low-malignant potential.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chu K, Tarone R, Freeman H (2003) Trends in prostate cancer mortality among black men and white men in the United States. Cancer 97(6):1507–1516CrossRefPubMed Chu K, Tarone R, Freeman H (2003) Trends in prostate cancer mortality among black men and white men in the United States. Cancer 97(6):1507–1516CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2017) Cancer Facts & Figures 2017. American Cancer Society, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2017) Cancer Facts & Figures 2017. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
3.
go back to reference Hankey B, Feuer E, Clegg L et al (1999) Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer—Part I: evidence of the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer incidence, mortality and survival rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1017–1024CrossRefPubMed Hankey B, Feuer E, Clegg L et al (1999) Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer—Part I: evidence of the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer incidence, mortality and survival rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1017–1024CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mendhiratta N, Rosenkrantz A, Meng X, Wysock JS, Fenstermaker M, Huang R, Deng FM, Melamed J, Zhou M, Huang WC, Lepor H, Taneja SS (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in a consecutive cohort of men with no previous biopsy: reduction of over detection through improved risk stratification. J Urol 194:1601–1606CrossRefPubMed Mendhiratta N, Rosenkrantz A, Meng X, Wysock JS, Fenstermaker M, Huang R, Deng FM, Melamed J, Zhou M, Huang WC, Lepor H, Taneja SS (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in a consecutive cohort of men with no previous biopsy: reduction of over detection through improved risk stratification. J Urol 194:1601–1606CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E, Schröder F, Parkinson R, Barentsz J, Thompson L (2014) Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 66:22–29CrossRefPubMed Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E, Schröder F, Parkinson R, Barentsz J, Thompson L (2014) Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 66:22–29CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Haffner J, Lemaitre L, Puech P, Haber GP, Leroy X, Jones JS, Villers A (2011) Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJU Int 108:E171–E178CrossRefPubMed Haffner J, Lemaitre L, Puech P, Haber GP, Leroy X, Jones JS, Villers A (2011) Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJU Int 108:E171–E178CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sugano D, Sidana A, Calio B, Cobb K, Turkby B, Pinto P (2017) MRI-targeted biopsy: is systematic biopsy obsolete? Can J Urol 24(4):8876–8882PubMed Sugano D, Sidana A, Calio B, Cobb K, Turkby B, Pinto P (2017) MRI-targeted biopsy: is systematic biopsy obsolete? Can J Urol 24(4):8876–8882PubMed
9.
go back to reference Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, Ehdaie B, Hadaschik B, Marks L, Mozer P, Rastinehad A, Ahmed H (2015) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 68:8–19CrossRefPubMed Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, Ehdaie B, Hadaschik B, Marks L, Mozer P, Rastinehad A, Ahmed H (2015) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 68:8–19CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fütterer J, Briganti A, Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, Taneja S, Thoeny H, Villeirs G, Villers A (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed Fütterer J, Briganti A, Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, Taneja S, Thoeny H, Villeirs G, Villers A (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schoots I, Roobol M, Nieboer D, Bangma C, Steyerberg E, Hunink M (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 68:438–450CrossRefPubMed Schoots I, Roobol M, Nieboer D, Bangma C, Steyerberg E, Hunink M (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 68:438–450CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Baco E, Rud E, Eri L, Moen G, Vlatkovic L, Svindland A, Eggesbo H, Ukimura O (2016) A randomized controlled trial to assess and compare the outcomes ot two-core prostate biopsy guided by fused magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images and traditional 12-core systematic biopsy. Eur Urol 69:149–156CrossRefPubMed Baco E, Rud E, Eri L, Moen G, Vlatkovic L, Svindland A, Eggesbo H, Ukimura O (2016) A randomized controlled trial to assess and compare the outcomes ot two-core prostate biopsy guided by fused magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images and traditional 12-core systematic biopsy. Eur Urol 69:149–156CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Haffner J, Lemaitre L, Puech P et al (2011) Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJU In 108:E171–E178CrossRef Haffner J, Lemaitre L, Puech P et al (2011) Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJU In 108:E171–E178CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Belas O, Klap J, Cornud F et al (2012) Prebiopsy multiparametic MRI of the prostate: the end of randomized biopsies? Prog Urol 22:583–589CrossRefPubMed Belas O, Klap J, Cornud F et al (2012) Prebiopsy multiparametic MRI of the prostate: the end of randomized biopsies? Prog Urol 22:583–589CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rehfuss A, Nakada S, Pearle MS, Thrasher JB, Feustel PJ, Kogan BA (2017) Use of nonprostate ultrasound in urology practice. Urol Pract 4(5):430–435CrossRef Rehfuss A, Nakada S, Pearle MS, Thrasher JB, Feustel PJ, Kogan BA (2017) Use of nonprostate ultrasound in urology practice. Urol Pract 4(5):430–435CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multiparametric ultrasound-targeted biopsy compares favorably to multiparametric MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy on initial biopsy of men at risk for prostate cancer
Author
Pat F. Fulgham
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2187-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

World Journal of Urology 5/2018 Go to the issue