Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Computed Tomography

Interscan variation of semi-automated volumetry of subsolid pulmonary nodules

Authors: Ernst Th. Scholten, Pim A. de Jong, Colin Jacobs, Bram van Ginneken, Sarah van Riel, Martin J. Willemink, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Matthijs Oudkerk, Harry J. de Koning, Nanda Horeweg, Mathias Prokop, Willem P. Th. M. Mali, Hester A. Gietema

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Rationale

We aimed to test the interscan variation of semi-automatic volumetry of subsolid nodules (SSNs), as growth evaluation is important for SSN management.

Methods

From a lung cancer screening trial all SSNs that were stable over at least 3 months were included (N = 44). SSNs were quantified on the baseline CT by two observers using semi-automatic volumetry software for effective diameter, volume, and mass. One observer also measured the SSNs on the second CT 3 months later. Interscan variation was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. Observer agreement was calculated as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as mean (± standard deviation) or median and interquartile range (IQR). A Mann-Whitney U test was used for the analysis of the influence of adjustments on the measurements.

Results

Semi-automatic measurements were feasible in all 44 SSNs. The interscan limits of agreement ranged from -12.0 % to 9.7 % for diameter, -35.4 % to 28.6 % for volume and -27.6 % to 30.8 % for mass. Agreement between observers was good with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.978, 0.957, and 0.968 for diameter, volume, and mass, respectively.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that when using our software an increase in mass of 30 % can be regarded as significant growth.

Key Points

Recently, recommendations regarding subsolid nodules have stressed the importance of growth quantification.
Volumetric measurement of subsolid nodules is feasible with good interscan agreement.
Increase of mass of 30 % can be regarded as significant growth.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J (2008) Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722CrossRefPubMed Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J (2008) Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R et al (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057CrossRefPubMed Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R et al (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KS, Han J, Yi CA, Kim YK (2007) Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section ct: histopathologic comparisons. Radiology 245:267–275CrossRefPubMed Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KS, Han J, Yi CA, Kim YK (2007) Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section ct: histopathologic comparisons. Radiology 245:267–275CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Naidich DP, Bankier AA, Macmahon H et al (2013) Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 266:304–317CrossRefPubMed Naidich DP, Bankier AA, Macmahon H et al (2013) Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 266:304–317CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference de Hoop B, Gietema H, van de Vorst S, Murphy K, van Klaveren RJ, Prokop M (2010) Pulmonary ground-glass nodules: increase in mass as an early indicator of growth. Radiology 255:199–206CrossRefPubMed de Hoop B, Gietema H, van de Vorst S, Murphy K, van Klaveren RJ, Prokop M (2010) Pulmonary ground-glass nodules: increase in mass as an early indicator of growth. Radiology 255:199–206CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L et al (2006) Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans IEEE Trans. Med Imaging 25:417–434CrossRef Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L et al (2006) Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans IEEE Trans. Med Imaging 25:417–434CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ et al (2010) Persistent pure ground-glass nodules in the lung: interscan variability of semiautomated volume and attenuation measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:408–414CrossRef Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ et al (2010) Persistent pure ground-glass nodules in the lung: interscan variability of semiautomated volume and attenuation measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:408–414CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim H, Park CM, Woo S et al (2013) Pure and part-solid pulmonary ground-glass nodules: measurement variability of volume and mass in nodules with a solid portion less than or equal to 5 mm. Radiology 269:585–593CrossRefPubMed Kim H, Park CM, Woo S et al (2013) Pure and part-solid pulmonary ground-glass nodules: measurement variability of volume and mass in nodules with a solid portion less than or equal to 5 mm. Radiology 269:585–593CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Godoy MC, Naidich DP (2012) Overview and strategic management of subsolid pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Imaging 27:240–248CrossRefPubMed Godoy MC, Naidich DP (2012) Overview and strategic management of subsolid pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Imaging 27:240–248CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M et al (2009) Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 361:2221–2229CrossRefPubMed van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M et al (2009) Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 361:2221–2229CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Scholten ET, Jacobs C, van Ginneken B et al (2013) Computer aided segmentation and volumetry of artificial ground glass nodules on chest computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:295–300CrossRefPubMed Scholten ET, Jacobs C, van Ginneken B et al (2013) Computer aided segmentation and volumetry of artificial ground glass nodules on chest computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:295–300CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Scholten ET, de Hoop B, Jacobs C et al (2013) Semi-automatic quantification of subsolid pulmonary nodules: comparison with manual Measurements. PLoS One 21:8(11) Scholten ET, de Hoop B, Jacobs C et al (2013) Semi-automatic quantification of subsolid pulmonary nodules: comparison with manual Measurements. PLoS One 21:8(11)
Metadata
Title
Interscan variation of semi-automated volumetry of subsolid pulmonary nodules
Authors
Ernst Th. Scholten
Pim A. de Jong
Colin Jacobs
Bram van Ginneken
Sarah van Riel
Martin J. Willemink
Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Matthijs Oudkerk
Harry J. de Koning
Nanda Horeweg
Mathias Prokop
Willem P. Th. M. Mali
Hester A. Gietema
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3478-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

European Radiology 4/2015 Go to the issue