Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2005

01-06-2005 | Breast

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and sonography in patients receiving primary chemotherapy for breast cancer

Authors: Filippo Montemurro, Laura Martincich, Giovanni De Rosa, Stefano Cirillo, Vincenzo Marra, Nicoletta Biglia, Marco Gatti, Piero Sismondi, Massimo Aglietta, Daniele Regge

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

We compared dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and sonography (US) for monitoring tumour size in 21 patients with breast cancer undergoing primary chemotherapy (PCT) followed by surgery. The correlation between DCE-MRI and US measurements of tumour size, defined as the product of the two major diameters, was 0.555 (P=0.009), 0.782 (P<0.001), and 0.793 (P<0.001) at baseline, and after two and four cycles of PCT, respectively. The median tumour size was significantly larger when measured by DCE-MRI than by US at baseline (1472 vs 900 mm2, P<0.001) and after two cycles of PCT (600 vs 400 mm2, P=0.009). After PCT, the median tumour size measured by the two techniques was similar (256 vs 289 mm2 for DCE-MRI and US, respectively, P=0.859). The correlation with the histopathological major tumour diameter was 0.824 (P<0.001) and 0.705 (P<0.001) for post-treatment DCE-MRI and US, respectively. Measurements of the final major tumour diameter by DCE-MRI tended to be more precise, including cases achieving a pathological complete response. Randomized trials are warranted to establish the clinical impact of the initial discrepancy in tumour size estimates between DCE-MRI and US, and the trend towards a better definition of the final tumour size provided by DCE-MRI in this clinical setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchholz TA, Hunt KK, Whitman GJ, Sahin AA, Hortobagyi GN (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: multidisciplinary considerations of benefits and risks. Cancer 98:1150–1160. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11603CrossRef Buchholz TA, Hunt KK, Whitman GJ, Sahin AA, Hortobagyi GN (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: multidisciplinary considerations of benefits and risks. Cancer 98:1150–1160. DOI 10.​1002/​cncr.​11603CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Smith R, et al (2003) International expert panel on the use of primary (preoperative) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: review and recommendations. J Clin Oncol 21:2600–2608. DOI 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.136CrossRef Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Smith R, et al (2003) International expert panel on the use of primary (preoperative) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: review and recommendations. J Clin Oncol 21:2600–2608. DOI 10.​1200/​JCO.​2003.​01.​136CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Herrada J, Iyer RB, Atkinson EN, Sneige N, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN (1997) Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 3:1565–1569 Herrada J, Iyer RB, Atkinson EN, Sneige N, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN (1997) Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 3:1565–1569
4.
go back to reference Vinnicombe SJ, MacVicar AD, Guy RL, Sloane JP, Powles TJ, Knee G, Husband JE (1996) Primary breast cancer: mammographic changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pathologic correlation. Radiology 198:333–340 Vinnicombe SJ, MacVicar AD, Guy RL, Sloane JP, Powles TJ, Knee G, Husband JE (1996) Primary breast cancer: mammographic changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pathologic correlation. Radiology 198:333–340
5.
go back to reference Huber S, Wagner M, Zuna I, Medl M, Czembirek H, Delorme S (2000) Locally advanced breast carcinoma: evaluation of mammography in the prediction of residual disease after induction chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 20:553–558 Huber S, Wagner M, Zuna I, Medl M, Czembirek H, Delorme S (2000) Locally advanced breast carcinoma: evaluation of mammography in the prediction of residual disease after induction chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 20:553–558
6.
go back to reference Cocconi G, Di Blasio B, Alberti G, Bisagni G, Botti E, Peracchia G (1984) Problems in evaluating response of primary breast cancer to systemic therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 4:309–313 Cocconi G, Di Blasio B, Alberti G, Bisagni G, Botti E, Peracchia G (1984) Problems in evaluating response of primary breast cancer to systemic therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 4:309–313
7.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Lozzelli A, Fausto A (2003) MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique, and new directions. Eur Radiol 13 [Suppl 3]:N28–N36 Sardanelli F, Lozzelli A, Fausto A (2003) MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique, and new directions. Eur Radiol 13 [Suppl 3]:N28–N36
8.
go back to reference Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E (1999) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 17:110–119PubMed Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E (1999) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 17:110–119PubMed
10.
go back to reference Fischer DR, Baltzer P, Malich A, Wurdinger S, Freesmeyer MG, Marx C, Kaiser WA (2004) Is the “blooming sign” a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography? Eur Radiol 14:394–401. DOI 10.1007/s00330-003-2055-9CrossRefPubMed Fischer DR, Baltzer P, Malich A, Wurdinger S, Freesmeyer MG, Marx C, Kaiser WA (2004) Is the “blooming sign” a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography? Eur Radiol 14:394–401. DOI 10.​1007/​s00330-003-2055-9CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kristoffersen WM, Aspelin P, Sylvan M, Bone B (2003) Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol 13:1207–1212. DOI 10.1007/s00330-002-1718-2 Kristoffersen WM, Aspelin P, Sylvan M, Bone B (2003) Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol 13:1207–1212. DOI 10.​1007/​s00330-002-1718-2
13.
go back to reference Viehweg P, Rotter K, Laniado M, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Kolbl H, Heywang-Kobrunner S (2004) MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients after breast-conserving therapy. Eur Radiol 14:402–408. DOI 10.1007/s00330-003-2086-2CrossRef Viehweg P, Rotter K, Laniado M, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Kolbl H, Heywang-Kobrunner S (2004) MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients after breast-conserving therapy. Eur Radiol 14:402–408. DOI 10.​1007/​s00330-003-2086-2CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rieber A, Schramm K, Helms G, et al (2003) Breast-conserving surgery and autogenous tissue reconstruction in patients with breast cancer: efficacy of MRI of the breast in the detection of recurrent disease. Eur Radiol 13:780–787. DOI 10.1007/s00330-002-1538-4 Rieber A, Schramm K, Helms G, et al (2003) Breast-conserving surgery and autogenous tissue reconstruction in patients with breast cancer: efficacy of MRI of the breast in the detection of recurrent disease. Eur Radiol 13:780–787. DOI 10.​1007/​s00330-002-1538-4
16.
go back to reference Abraham DC, Jones RC, Jones SE, et al (1996) Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 78:91–100CrossRef Abraham DC, Jones RC, Jones SE, et al (1996) Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 78:91–100CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Martincich L, Montemurro F, De Rosa G, et al (2004) Monitoring response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 83:67–76CrossRef Martincich L, Montemurro F, De Rosa G, et al (2004) Monitoring response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 83:67–76CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wasser K, Klein SK, Fink C, et al (2003) Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of breast cancer using dynamic MRI with high temporal resolution. Eur Radiol 13:80–87 Wasser K, Klein SK, Fink C, et al (2003) Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of breast cancer using dynamic MRI with high temporal resolution. Eur Radiol 13:80–87
20.
go back to reference Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, et al (2002) Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3628–3636CrossRef Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, et al (2002) Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3628–3636CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cheung YC, Chen SC, Su MY, et al (2003) Monitoring the size and response of locally advanced breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel and epirubicin) with serial enhanced MRI. Breast Cancer Res Treat 78:51–58CrossRef Cheung YC, Chen SC, Su MY, et al (2003) Monitoring the size and response of locally advanced breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel and epirubicin) with serial enhanced MRI. Breast Cancer Res Treat 78:51–58CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, et al (2002) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 20:1456–1466CrossRefPubMed Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, et al (2002) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 20:1456–1466CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kuerer HM, Singletary SE, Buzdar AU, et al (2001) Surgical conservation planning after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and operable stage III breast carcinoma. Am J Surg 182:601–608CrossRef Kuerer HM, Singletary SE, Buzdar AU, et al (2001) Surgical conservation planning after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and operable stage III breast carcinoma. Am J Surg 182:601–608CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Esserman L, Kaplan E, Partridge S, et al (2001) MRI phenotype is associated with response to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 8:549–559CrossRef Esserman L, Kaplan E, Partridge S, et al (2001) MRI phenotype is associated with response to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 8:549–559CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Davis PL, Staiger MJ, Harris KB, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS Jr, Tobon H (1996) Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 37:1–9 Davis PL, Staiger MJ, Harris KB, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS Jr, Tobon H (1996) Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 37:1–9
26.
go back to reference Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al (1995) Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197:743–747PubMed Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al (1995) Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197:743–747PubMed
27.
go back to reference Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, Takahashi M, Taguchi K, Itoh T, Todo S (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 198:190–197. DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.008CrossRef Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, Takahashi M, Taguchi K, Itoh T, Todo S (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 198:190–197. DOI 10.​1016/​j.​jamcollsurg.​2003.​10.​008CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685PubMed Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685PubMed
30.
go back to reference Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102 Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102
31.
go back to reference Wasser K, Sinn HP, Fink C, et al (2003) Accuracy of tumor size measurement in breast cancer using MRI is influenced by histological regression induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 13:1213–1223 Wasser K, Sinn HP, Fink C, et al (2003) Accuracy of tumor size measurement in breast cancer using MRI is influenced by histological regression induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 13:1213–1223
32.
go back to reference Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al (1999) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:460–469PubMed Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al (1999) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:460–469PubMed
33.
go back to reference Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, et al (2003) The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 21:4165–4174. DOI 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.005CrossRefPubMed Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, et al (2003) The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 21:4165–4174. DOI 10.​1200/​JCO.​2003.​12.​005CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Warren RM, Bobrow LG, Earl HM, et al (2004) Can breast MRI help in the management of women with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Br J Cancer 90:1349–1360CrossRef Warren RM, Bobrow LG, Earl HM, et al (2004) Can breast MRI help in the management of women with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Br J Cancer 90:1349–1360CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and sonography in patients receiving primary chemotherapy for breast cancer
Authors
Filippo Montemurro
Laura Martincich
Giovanni De Rosa
Stefano Cirillo
Vincenzo Marra
Nicoletta Biglia
Marco Gatti
Piero Sismondi
Massimo Aglietta
Daniele Regge
Publication date
01-06-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2656-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2005

European Radiology 6/2005 Go to the issue