Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Paper

Revision of ASR hip arthroplasty: analysis of two hundred and ninety six recalled patients at seven years

Authors: Giovanni Benelli, Merildo Maritato, Pierpaolo Cerulli Mariani, Francesco Sasso

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to present an algorithm for the evaluation of both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

Methods

From November 2004 to May 2010, there were performed 296 operations: 245 total hip arthroplasty and 51 resurfacing arthroplasty with the ASR DePuy system. In April 2010, there was the first Medical Device Alert regarding all MoM hip replacements in the UK and in August 2010, DePuy recall started worldwide. In March 2012, we started our recall. All patients were invited to undergo clinical investigation, X-ray evaluations, and blood chrome and cobalt level determination. For a short period of time, there were performed second level exams and subsequently, we carried out MARS MRI hip study to all symptomatic patients and there was evidence of ALVAL lesions.

Results

To the patients with ALVAL lesions were proposed surgical hip revision while the others frequent follow-up controls. One hundred patients underwent hip surgical revision.

Conclusions

We recommend constant MoM THA patients monitoring and early revision if necessary.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tibrewal S, Sabah S, Henckel J, Hart A (2014) The effect of a manufacturer recall on the threshold to revise a metal-on-metal hip. Int Orthop 38:2017–2020CrossRefPubMed Tibrewal S, Sabah S, Henckel J, Hart A (2014) The effect of a manufacturer recall on the threshold to revise a metal-on-metal hip. Int Orthop 38:2017–2020CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Akisue T (2017) Is metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty still an alternative? Commentary on an article by Tobias Reiner, MD, et all. “MRI Findings in Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years”. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(18):e101CrossRefPubMed Akisue T (2017) Is metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty still an alternative? Commentary on an article by Tobias Reiner, MD, et all. “MRI Findings in Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years”. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(18):e101CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ansari JS, Matharu GS, Pandit H (2018) Metal-on-metal hips: current status. Orthop Trauma 32(1):54–60CrossRef Ansari JS, Matharu GS, Pandit H (2018) Metal-on-metal hips: current status. Orthop Trauma 32(1):54–60CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Liow MHL, Kwon YM (2017) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: risk factors for pseudotumours and clinical systematic evaluation. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. Int Orthop 41(5):885–892CrossRefPubMed Liow MHL, Kwon YM (2017) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: risk factors for pseudotumours and clinical systematic evaluation. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. Int Orthop 41(5):885–892CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):38–46CrossRef Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):38–46CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sofka CM, Ho ST, Peters LE, Salvati EA (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(9):1947–1954CrossRef Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sofka CM, Ho ST, Peters LE, Salvati EA (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(9):1947–1954CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mohaddes M, Cnudde P, Rolfson O, Wall A, Kärrholm J (2017) Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Int Orthop 41(3):583–588CrossRefPubMed Mohaddes M, Cnudde P, Rolfson O, Wall A, Kärrholm J (2017) Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Int Orthop 41(3):583–588CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Laura AD, Hothi H, Battisti C, Cerquiglini A, Henckel J, Skinner J, Hart A (2017) Wear of dual-mobility cups: a review article. Int Orthop 41(3):625–633CrossRefPubMed Laura AD, Hothi H, Battisti C, Cerquiglini A, Henckel J, Skinner J, Hart A (2017) Wear of dual-mobility cups: a review article. Int Orthop 41(3):625–633CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Zhang X, Wang J, Xiao J, Shi Z (2016) Early failures of porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants: a case series with retrieval analysis. Int Orthop 40(9):1827–1834CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Wang J, Xiao J, Shi Z (2016) Early failures of porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants: a case series with retrieval analysis. Int Orthop 40(9):1827–1834CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hernigou P, Dubory A, Potage D, Roubineau F, Flouzat Lachaniette CH (2017) Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision. Int Orthop 41(3):481–490CrossRefPubMed Hernigou P, Dubory A, Potage D, Roubineau F, Flouzat Lachaniette CH (2017) Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision. Int Orthop 41(3):481–490CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hothi HS, Berber R, Whittaker RK, Blunn GW, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2016) The relationship between cobalt/chromium ratios and the high prevalence of head-stem junction corrosion in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 31(5):1123–1127CrossRef Hothi HS, Berber R, Whittaker RK, Blunn GW, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2016) The relationship between cobalt/chromium ratios and the high prevalence of head-stem junction corrosion in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 31(5):1123–1127CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Su EP (2016) Metal-on-metal problems: diagnosis and management. Semin Arthroplast 27(4):244–249CrossRef Su EP (2016) Metal-on-metal problems: diagnosis and management. Semin Arthroplast 27(4):244–249CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Atrey A, Hart A, Hussain N, Waite J, Shepherd AJ, Young S (2016) 601 metal-on-metal total hip replacements with 36 mm heads a 5 minimum year follow up: Levels of ARMD remain low despite a comprehensive screening program. J Orthop 14(1):108–114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Atrey A, Hart A, Hussain N, Waite J, Shepherd AJ, Young S (2016) 601 metal-on-metal total hip replacements with 36 mm heads a 5 minimum year follow up: Levels of ARMD remain low despite a comprehensive screening program. J Orthop 14(1):108–114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB, Satterwhite KL (2016) Adverse reactions to metal on metal are not exclusive to large heads in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):432–440CrossRefPubMed Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB, Satterwhite KL (2016) Adverse reactions to metal on metal are not exclusive to large heads in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):432–440CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Affatato S, Comitini S, Fosco M, Toni A, Tigani D (2016) Radiological identification of Zweymüller-type femoral stem prosthesis in revision cases. Int Orthop 40(11):2261–2269CrossRefPubMed Affatato S, Comitini S, Fosco M, Toni A, Tigani D (2016) Radiological identification of Zweymüller-type femoral stem prosthesis in revision cases. Int Orthop 40(11):2261–2269CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mistry JB, Chughtai M, Elmallah RK, Diedrich A, Le S, Thomas M, Mont MA (2016) Trunnionosis in total hip arthroplasty: a review. J Orthop Traumatol 17(1):1–6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mistry JB, Chughtai M, Elmallah RK, Diedrich A, Le S, Thomas M, Mont MA (2016) Trunnionosis in total hip arthroplasty: a review. J Orthop Traumatol 17(1):1–6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
go back to reference Huang JF, Shen JJ, Chen JJ, Zheng Y, Du WX, Liu FC (2015) New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop 39(9):1765–1769CrossRefPubMed Huang JF, Shen JJ, Chen JJ, Zheng Y, Du WX, Liu FC (2015) New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop 39(9):1765–1769CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Gandhi JN, Sidaginamale R, Mereddy P, Lord J, Nargol AV (2011) Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(8):1011–1016CrossRefPubMed Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Gandhi JN, Sidaginamale R, Mereddy P, Lord J, Nargol AV (2011) Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(8):1011–1016CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Revision of ASR hip arthroplasty: analysis of two hundred and ninety six recalled patients at seven years
Authors
Giovanni Benelli
Merildo Maritato
Pierpaolo Cerulli Mariani
Francesco Sasso
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4128-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Orthopaedics 1/2019 Go to the issue