Top

Published in:

Open Access 24-03-2022 | Care | Review

Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends

Authors: K.E. Åkesson, K. Ganda, C. Deignan, M.K. Oates, A. Volpert, K. Brooks, D. Lee, D.R. Dirschl, A.J. Singer

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 8/2022

Abstract

Post-fracture care (PFC) programs evaluate and manage patients with a minimal trauma or fragility fracture to prevent subsequent fractures. We conducted a literature review to understand current trends in PFC publications, evaluate key characteristics of PFC programs, and assess their clinical effectiveness, geographic variations, and cost-effectiveness. We performed a search for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2003 and December 2020 listed in PubMed or Google Scholar. We categorized identified articles into 4 non-mutually exclusive PFC subtopics based on keywords and abstract content: PFC Types, PFC Effectiveness/Success, PFC Geography, and PFC Economics. The literature search identified 784 eligible articles. Most articles fit into multiple PFC subtopics (PFC Types, 597; PFC Effectiveness/Success, 579; PFC Geography, 255; and PFC Economics, 98). The number of publications describing how PFC programs can improve osteoporosis treatment rates has markedly increased since 2003; however, publication gaps remain, including low numbers of publications from some countries with reported high rates of osteoporosis and/or hip fractures. Fracture liaison services and geriatric/orthogeriatric services were the most common models of PFC programs, and both were shown to be cost-effective. We identified a need to expand and refine PFC programs and to standardize patient identification and reporting on quality improvement measures. Although there is an increasing awareness of the importance of PFC programs, publication gaps remain in most countries. Improvements in established PFC programs and implementation of new PFC programs are still needed to enhance equitable patient care to prevent occurrence of subsequent fractures.

Available only for authorised users

International Osteoporosis Foundation. About osteoporosis. Available at: https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/health-professionals/about-osteoporosis. Accessed 24 January 2022.

National Institute of Health (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. JAMA 285:785–795

International Osteoporosis Foundation. Facts and statistics. Epidemiology of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Available at: https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/facts-statistics/epidemiology-of-osteoporosis-and-fragility-fractures. Accessed 24 January 2022.

Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733PubMedCrossRef

GBD 2019 Fracture Collaborators (2021) Global, regional, and national burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev 2:e580–e592CrossRef

Lewiecki EM, Ortendahl JD, Vanderpuye-Orgle J, Grauer A, Arellano J, Lemay J, Harmon AL, Broder MS, Singer AJ (2019) Healthcare policy changes in osteoporosis can improve outcomes and reduce costs in the United States. JBMR Plus 3:e10192PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Ganda K, Mitchell PJ, Seibel MJ (2019) Models of secondary fracture prevention. In: Siebel MJ, Mitchell PJ (eds) Secondary fracture prevention: an international perspective. Academic Press, London, pp 33–62CrossRef

Grigoryan KV, Javedan H, Rudolph JL (2014) Orthogeriatric care models and outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 28:e49–e55PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Schweser KM, Crist BD, Nguyen VH (2017) Combined orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service for improved postfracture patient care. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 3:159PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

10.

Naranjo A, Fernández-Conde S, Ojeda S, Torres-Hernández L, Hernández-Carballo C, Bernardos I, Rodríguez S, Laynez P (2017) Preventing future fractures: effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service compared to an outpatient fracture liaison service and the standard management in patients with hip fracture. Arch Osteoporos 12:112PubMedCrossRef

11.

Schray D, Neuerburg C, Stein J, Gosch M, Schieker M, Böcker W, Kammerlander C (2016) Value of a coordinated management of osteoporosis via fracture liaison service for the treatment of orthogeriatric patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42:559–564PubMedCrossRef

12.

Borade A, Kempegowda H, Tawari A, Suk M, Horwitz DS (2016) Improvement in osteoporosis detection in a fracture liaison service with integration of a geriatric hip fracture care program. Injury 47:2755–2759PubMedCrossRef

13.

Carlson BC, Robinson WA, Wanderman NR, Nassr AN, Huddleston PM 3rd, Yaszemski MJ, Currier BL, Jeray KJ, Kirk KL, Bunta AD, Murphy S, Patel B, Watkins CM, Sietsema DL, Edwards BJ, Tosi LL, Anderson PA, Freedman BA (2018) The American Orthopaedic Association's Own the Bone® database: a national quality improvement project for the treatment of bone health in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 29:2101–2109PubMedCrossRef

14.

Mackey PA, Rosenthal LD, Mi L, Whitaker MD (2019) Subsequent fracture prevention in patients 50 years and older with fragility fractures: a quality improvement initiative. J Healthc Qual 41:17–22PubMedCrossRef

15.

Holzmueller CG, Karp S, Zeldow D, Lee DB, Thompson DA (2016) Development of a cloud-based application for the fracture liaison service model of care. Osteoporos Int 27:683–690PubMedCrossRef

16.

Gupta MJ, Shah S, Peterson S, Baim S (2018) Rush Fracture Liaison Service for capturing “missed opportunities” to treat osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int 29:1861–1874PubMedCrossRef

17.

Lewiecki EM, Rochelle R, Bouchonville MF 2nd, Chafey DH, Olenginski TP, Arora S (2017) Leveraging scarce resources with Bone Health TeleECHO to improve the care of osteoporosis. J Endocr Soc 1:1428–1434PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

18.

Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Herson M, Orwoll E, Chen C, Aickin M, Swain MC (2006) Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:450–457PubMedCrossRef

19.

Baim S (2017) The future of fracture risk assessment in the management of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 20:451–457PubMedCrossRef

20.

Rothman MS, Olenginski TP, Stanciu I, Krohn K, Lewiecki EM (2019) Lessons learned with Bone Health TeleECHO: making treatment decisions when guidelines conflict. Osteoporos Int 30:2401–2406PubMedCrossRef

21.

Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD, Kyer C, Cooper C, IOF Fracture Working Group (2013) Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24:2135–2152PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

22.

Clark EM, Gould V, Morrison L, Ades AE, Dieppe P, Tobias JH (2012) Randomized controlled trial of a primary care-based screening program to identify older women with prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures: cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA). J Bone Miner Res 27:664–671PubMedCrossRef

23.

Edwards BJ, Bunta AD, Anderson J, Bobb A, Hahr A, O'Leary KJ, Agulnek A, Andruszyn L, Cameron KA, May M, Kazmers NH, Dillon N, Baker DW, Williams MV (2012) Development of an electronic medical record based intervention to improve medical care of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23:2489–2498PubMedCrossRef

24.

O'Brien LK, Armstrong AD, Hassenbein SE, Fox EJ (2015) Evaluation of patients' response toward osteoporosis letter intervention versus phone call plus letter intervention. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 6:246–250PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

25.

Gosch M, Bail H-J, Grueninger S, Stumpf U, Kammerlander C, Wicklein S (2020) What is a reasonable rate for specific osteoporosis drug therapy in older fragility fracture patients? Arch Osteoporos 15:20PubMedCrossRef

26.

Beaupre LA, Moradi F, Khong H, Smith C, Evens L, Hanson HM, Juby AG, Kivi P, Majumdar SR, STOP-Fracture Team (2020) Implementation of an in-patient hip fracture liaison services to improve initiation of osteoporosis medication use within 1-year of hip fracture: a population-based time series analysis using the RE-AIM framework. Arch Osteoporos 15:83PubMedCrossRef

27.

Beaupre LA, Lier D, Smith C, Evens L, Hanson HM, Juby AG, Kivi P, Majumdar SR, STOP-Fracture Team (2020) A 3i hip fracture liaison service with nurse and physician co-management is cost-effective when implemented as a standard clinical program. Arch Osteoporos 15:113PubMedCrossRef

28.

Kuiper BW, Graybill S, Tate JM, Kaufman N, Bersabe D (2018) After the fall: improving osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 29:1295–1301PubMedCrossRef

29.

Ruggiero C, Zampi E, Rinonapoli G, Baroni M, Serra R, Zengarini E, Baglioni G, Duranti G, Ercolani S, Conti F, Caraffa A, Mecocci P, Brandi ML (2015) Fracture prevention service to bridge the osteoporosis care gap. Clin Interv Aging 10:1035–1042PubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Abrahamsen C, Nørgaard B, Draborg E, Nielsen MF (2019) The impact of an orthogeriatric intervention in patients with fragility fractures: a cohort study. BMC Geriatr 19:268PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

31.

Ong T, Sahota O, Gladman JRF (2020) The Nottingham Spinal Health (NoSH) Study: a cohort study of patients hospitalised with vertebral fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int 31:363–370PubMedCrossRef

32.

González-Quevedo D, Bautista-Enrique D, Pérez-del-Río V, Bravo-Bardají M, García-de-Quevedo D, Tamimi I (2020) Fracture liaison service and mortality in elderly hip fracture patients: a prospective cohort study. Osteoporos Int 31:77–84PubMedCrossRef

33.

Wozniak LA, Beaupre LA, Juby A, Kivi P, Majumdar SR, Hanson HM (2020) Successful implementation of a fracture liaison service through effective change management: a qualitative study. Arch Osteoporos 15:44PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

34.

Naranjo A, Molina A, Sepúlveda C, Rubiño FJ, Martín N, Ojeda S (2020) The evolution of an FLS in search of excellence: the experience of Gran Canaria. Arch Osteoporos 15:108PubMedCrossRef

35.

Hoang-Kim A, Kanengisser D (2020) Developing registries and effective care models for the management of hip fractures: aligning political, organizational drivers with clinical outcomes. Curr Osteoporos Rep 18:180–188PubMedCrossRef

36.

Majumdar SR, Lier DA, Hanley DA, Juby AG, Beaupre LA (2017) Economic evaluation of a population-based osteoporosis intervention for outpatients with non-traumatic non-hip fractures: the “Catch a Break” 1i [type C] FLS. Osteoporos Int 28:1965–1977PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

37.

Dirschl DR, Rustom H (2018) Practice patterns and performance in U.S. fracture liaison programs: an analysis of >32,000 patients from the Own the Bone program. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:680–685PubMedCrossRef

38.

Stephens JR, Caraccio D, Mabry DR, Stepanek KV, Jones MS, Hemsey DF (1995) Moore CR (2021) Implementation of a fracture liaison service for patients with hip fracture cared for on a hospital medicine service. Hosp Pract 49:41–46CrossRef

39.

Vranken L, Wyers CE, van Rietbergen B, Driessen JHM, Geusens PPMM, Janzing HMJ, van der Velde RY, van den Bergh JPW (2019) The association between prevalent vertebral fractures and bone quality of the distal radius and distal tibia as measured with HR-pQCT in postmenopausal women with a recent non-vertebral fracture at the Fracture Liaison Service. Osteoporos Int 30:1789–1797PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

40.

Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center JR, Eisman JA, March L, Seibel MJ (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:393–406PubMedCrossRef

41.

Ganda K, Mitchell PJ, Seibel MJ (2019) Chapter 3 - models of secondary fracture prevention: systematic review and metaanalysis of outcomes. In: Seibel MJ, Mitchell PJ (eds) Secondary Fracture Prevention. Academic Press, London, pp 33–62CrossRef

42.

Senay A, Delisle J, Raynauld JP, Morin SN, Fernandes JC (2016) Agreement between physicians’ and nurses’ clinical decisions for the management of the fracture liaison service (4iFLS): the Lucky Bone™ program. Osteoporos Int 27:1569–1576PubMedCrossRef

43.

Hung W-C, Yang C-H, Cheng W-L, Wu C-H (2019) Revisit three “I” model: a novel five “I” model of fracture liaison service. Osteoporos Int 30:2361–2362PubMedCrossRef

44.

Palcu P, Munce S, Jaglal SB, Allin S, Chishtie JA, Silverstein A, Kim S (2020) Understanding patient experiences and challenges to osteoporosis care delivered virtually by telemedicine: a mixed methods study. Osteoporos Int 31:351–361PubMedCrossRef

45.

Paskins Z, Crawford-Manning F, Bullock L, Jinks C (2020) Identifying and managing osteoporosis before and after COVID-19: rise of the remote consultation? Osteoporos Int 31:1629–1632PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

46.

Marschollek M, Becker M, Bauer JM, Bente P, Dasenbrock L, Elbers K, Hein A, Kolb G, Künemund H, Lammel-Polchau C, Meis M, Zu M, Schwabedissen H, Remmers H, Schulze M, Steen EE, Thoben W, Wang J, Wolf KH, Haux R (2014) Multimodal activity monitoring for home rehabilitation of geriatric fracture patients—feasibility and acceptance of sensor systems in the GAL-NATARS study. Inform Health Soc Care 39:262–271PubMedCrossRef

47.

Geerds MAJ, Nijmeijer WS, Hegeman JH, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR (2020) Mobile app for monitoring 3-month postoperative functional outcome after hip fracture: usability study. JMIR Hum Factors 7:e16989PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

48.

Martin J, Viprey M, Castagne B, Merle B, Giroudon C, Chapurlat R, Schott A-M (2020) Interventions to improve osteoporosis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 31:429–446PubMedCrossRef

49.

Wu C-H, Tu S-T, Chang Y-F, Chan D-C, Chien J-T, Lin C-H, Singh S, Dasari M, Chen J-F, Tsai K-S (2018) Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Bone 111:92–100PubMedCrossRef

50.

Senay A, Perreault S, Delisle J, Morin SN, Fernandes JC (2020) Performance of a fracture liaison service in an orthopaedic setting: a report of key indicators and improvement of longitudinal outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:486–494PubMedCrossRef

51.

French S, Choden S, Schmajuk G (2019) Quality measures and quality improvement initiatives in osteoporosis—an update. Curr Osteoporos Rep 17:491–509PubMedCrossRef

52.

Javaid MK, Sami A, Lems W, Mitchell P, Thomas T, Singer A, Speerin R, Fujita M, Pierroz DD, Akesson K, Halbout P, Ferrari S, Cooper C (2020) A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network. Osteoporos Int 31:1193–1204PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

53.

Sale JEM, Beaton D, Posen J, Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch E (2014) Key outcomes are usually not reported in published fracture secondary prevention programs: results of a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:283–289PubMedCrossRef

54.

Voeten SC, Arends AJ, Wouters MWJM, Blom BJ, Heetveld MJ, Slee-Valentijn MS, Krijnen P, Schipper IB, JHH H, Dutch Hip Fracture Audit Group (2019) The Dutch Hip Fracture Audit: evaluation of the quality of multidisciplinary hip fracture care in the Netherlands. Arch Osteoporos 14:28PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

55.

Liem IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, Blauth M, Roth T, Gosch M, Hoang-Kim A, Mendelson D, Zuckerman J, Leung F, Burton J, Moran C, Parker M, Giusti A, Pioli G, Goldhahn J, Kates SL (2013) Identifying a standard set of outcome parameters for the evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for hip fractures. Injury 44:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef

56.

International Osteoporosis Foundation. Capture the Fracture. Implementation strategies. Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients. Available at: https://www.capturethefracture.org/implementation-strategies. Accessed 24 January 2022.

57.

Fergusson K, Gill C, Harris R, Kim D, Mitchell P, Ward N. Clinical standards for fracture liaison services in New Zealand. 2021 second edition. Available at: https://osteoporosis.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/ONZ-FLS-Clinical-Standards-Sept-2021-1.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2022.

58.

Japan Osteoporosis Society and Fragility Fracture Network Japan. Clinical standards for fracture liaison services in Japan. Available at: http://ffn.or.jp/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/bf2ea636831d1fcc8bded072714defda.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2022.

59.

Royal Osteoporosis Society. Effective secondary prevention: clinical standards for fracture liaison services. Available at: https://theros.org.uk/healthcare-professionals/fracture-liaison-services/. Accessed 24 January 2022.

60.

Aboudiab M, Grados F, Batteux B, Henry-Desailly I, Fardellone P, Goëb V (2020) Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in patients over 50 years of age with a non-severe peripheral fracture. Osteoporos Int 31:1477–1486PubMedCrossRef

61.

Schousboe JT, Lix LM, Morin SN, Derkatch S, Bryanton M, Alhrbi M, Leslie WD (2019) Vertebral fracture assessment increases use of pharmacologic therapy for fracture prevention in clinical practice. J Bone Miner Res 34:2205–2212PubMedCrossRef

62.

Schousboe JT, Lix LM, Morin SN, Derkatch S, Bryanton M, Alhrbi M, Leslie WD (2019) Prevalent vertebral fracture on bone density lateral spine (VFA) images in routine clinical practice predict incident fractures. Bone 121:72–79PubMedCrossRef

63.

Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R (2014) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25:2359–2381PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

64.

Rosen HN, Vokes TJ, Malabanan AO, Deal CL, Alele JD, Olenginski TP, Schousboe JT (2013) The official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: vertebral fracture assessment. J Clin Densitom 16:482–488PubMedCrossRef

65.

Hawley S, Javaid MK, Prieto-Alhambra D, Lippett J, Sheard S, Arden NK, Cooper C, Judge A, REFReSH Study Group (2016) Clinical effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: population-based longitudinal study. Age Ageing 45:236–242PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

66.

Neuerburg C, Mittlmeier L, Schmidmaier R, Kammerlander C, Böcker W, Mutschler W, Stumpf U (2017) Investigation and management of osteoporosis in aged trauma patients: a treatment algorithm adapted to the German guidelines for osteoporosis. J Orthop Surg Res 12:86PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

67.

Li H, Wang Y, Wang R, Yue L, Chen S, Li C (2020) Effects of rosuvastatin and zoledronic acid in combination on the recovery of senile osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture following percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Int Med Res 48:300060520925390PubMed

68.

Liu Z, Li C-W, Mao Y-F, Liu K, Liang B-C, Wu L-G, Shi X-L (2019) Study on zoledronic acid reducing acute bone loss and fracture rates in elderly postoperative patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Orthop Surg 11:380–385PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

69.

Jia KQ, Southerland L, Phieffer L, Stephens JA, Ing SW (2020) Incorporation of a patient navigator into a secondary fracture prevention program identifies barriers to patient care. Aging Clin Exp Res 32:2557–2564PubMedCrossRef

70.

Martin J, Viprey M, Castagne B, Barral M, Chapurlat R, Julien C, Serrier H, Schott A-M (2020) Cost-effectiveness analyses of interventions to improve osteoporosis care in France. Arch Osteoporos 15:42PubMedCrossRef

71.

Majumdar SR, Lier DA, McAlister FA, Johnson JA, Rowe BH, Beaupre LA (2019) Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis interventions to improve quality of care after upper extremity fracture: results from a randomized trial (C-STOP Trial). J Bone Miner Res 34:1220–1228PubMedCrossRef

72.

Clement RC, Ahn J, Mehta S, Bernstein J (2013) Economic viability of geriatric hip fracture centers. Orthopedics 36:e1509–e1514PubMedCrossRef

73.

Metcalfe D, Zogg CK, Judge A, Perry DC, Gabbe B, Willett K, Costa ML (2019) Pay for performance and hip fracture outcomes: an interrupted time series and difference-in-differences analysis in England and Scotland. Bone Joint J 101-B:1015–1023PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

74.

Nishi T, Maeda T, Babazono A (2018) Association between financial incentives for regional care coordination and health care resource utilization among older patients after femoral neck fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort study using a claims database. Popul Health Manag 21:331–337PubMedCrossRef

75.

Valentin G, Pedersen SE, Christensen R, Friis K, Nielsen CP, Bhimjiyani A, Gregson CL, Langdahl BL (2020) Socio-economic inequalities in fragility fracture outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic observational studies. Osteoporos Int 31:31–42PubMedCrossRef

76.

Malik AT, Retchin S, Phillips FM, Xu W, Peters K, Yu E, Khan SN (2020) Declining trend in osteoporosis management and screening following vertebral compression fractures – a national analysis of commercial insurance and medicare advantage beneficiaries. Spine J 20:538–546

77.

Ong T, Copeland R, Thiam CN, Cerda Mas G, Marshall L, Sahota O (2021) Integration of a vertebral fracture identification service into a fracture liaison service: a quality improvement project. Osteoporos Int 32:921–926PubMedCrossRef

78.

Howlett DC, Drinkwater KJ, Mahmood N, Illes J, Griffin J, Javaid K (2020) Radiology reporting of osteoporotic vertebral fragility fractures on computed tomography studies: results of a UK national audit. Eur Radiol 30:4713–4723PubMedCrossRef

79.

Toal M, McLoughlin C, Pierce N, Moss J, English S, Lindsay JR (2020) Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention? Arch Osteoporos 15:160PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

80.

Schousboe JT, Davison ML, Dowd B, Thiede Call K, Johnson P, Kane RL (2011) Predictors of patients’ perceived need for medication to prevent fracture. Med Care 49:273–280PubMedCrossRef

81.

Abbad N, Lemeunier L, Chantelot C, Puisieux F, Cortet B (2016) Secondary prevention program for osteoporotic fractures at Lille University Hospital. Presse Med 45:375–377PubMedCrossRef

82.

Bunta AD, Edwards BJ, Macaulay WB Jr, Jeray KJ, Tosi LL, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Kaufman JD, Murphy SA, Song J, Goulet JA, Friedlaender GE, Swiontkowski MF, Dirschl DR (2016) Own the bone, a system-based intervention, improves osteoporosis care after fragility fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:e109PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

83.

Asian Pacific Fragility Fracture Alliance. Hip Fracture Registry Toolbox. A collaboration between the APGGA Hip Fracture Registry Working Group and the FFN Hip Fracture Audit Special Interest Group. Available at: https://apfracturealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/APFFA-FFN-Hip-Fracture-Registry-Toolbox-Interactive-v1.0-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2022.

84.

Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster J-Y (2019) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 30:3–44PubMedCrossRef

85.

Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Diab DL, Eldeiry LS, Farooki A, Harris ST, Hurley DL, Kelly J, Lewiecki EM, Pessah-Pollack R, McClung M, Wimalawansa SJ, Watts NB (2020) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis—2020 update. Endocr Pract 26:1–46PubMedCrossRef

86.

Eastell R, Rosen CJ, Black DM, Cheung AM, Murad MH, Shoback D (2019) Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an Endocrine Society* clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:1595–1622PubMedCrossRef

87.

Kanis JA, Harvey NC, McCloskey E, Bruyère O, Veronese N, Lorentzon M, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Adib G, Al-Daghri N, Campusano C, Chandran M, Dawson-Hughes B, Javaid K, Jiwa F, Johansson H, Lee JK, Liu E, Messina D et al (2020) Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 31:1–12PubMedCrossRef

88.

Chui K, Thakrar A, Shankar S (2020) Evaluating the efficacy of a two-site (‘COVID-19’ and ‘COVID-19-free’) trauma and orthopaedic service for the management of hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Bone Jt Open 1:190–197PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Title: Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends
Authors: K.E. Åkesson
K. Ganda
C. Deignan
M.K. Oates
A. Volpert
K. Brooks
D. Lee
D.R. Dirschl
A.J. Singer
Publication date: 24-03-2022
Publisher: Springer London
Keywords: Care
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis
Published in: Osteoporosis International / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06358-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

Reduced hip bone mineral density is associated with high levels of calciprotein particles in patients with Fabry disease

Response to comments on “Gamma-glutamyl-transferase is associated with incident hip fractures in women and men ≥ 50 years: a large population-based cohort study”

Improving the reporting of economic evaluation in osteoporosis: the value of CHEERS 2022 statement

Gamma-glutamyl-transferase and hip fracture

Correction to: Risk of osteoporosis and fracture after hysterectomies without oophorectomies: a systematic review and pooled analysis

Effect of degeneration on bone mineral density, trabecular bone score and CT Hounsfield unit measurements in a spine surgery patient population