Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 3/2009

01-03-2009 | Original Article

Design of the POSSIBLE US™ Study: postmenopausal women’s compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications

Authors: E. Barrett-Connor, K. Ensrud, A. N. A. Tosteson, S. F. Varon, M. Anthony, N. Daizadeh, S. Wade

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Failure to take prescribed medication is common. The POSSIBLE US™ study is evaluating the impact of physician and patient characteristics on patient-reported compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications. We report our study design and the baseline characteristics of 4,994 postmenopausal women recruited from primary care physician offices in 33 states.

Introduction

The Prospective Observational Scientific Study Investigating Bone Loss Experience (POSSIBLE US™) is a longitudinal cohort study of osteoporosis therapy in primary care.

Methods

Between 2004 and 2007, 134 physicians (in 33 states) enrolled postmenopausal women initiating, changing, or continuing osteoporosis medications. After completing a baseline questionnaire, participants will provide data semi-annually for up to 3 years through 2008. Physicians provide patient data at baseline and routine follow-up visits. Participants from 23 sites also signed a release regarding administrative claims data for economic analyses and validation of self-reported data.

Baseline results

Four thousand nine hundred and ninety-four evaluable women were recruited from internal medicine (n = 1,784), family practice (n = 1,556), obstetrics/gynecology (n = 1,556), and from one rheumatology practice (n = 98). Mean participant age was 64.3 years (SD = 9.97); 89% were Caucasian; 59% had some college education. Sixty-three percent used a single osteoporosis agent, usually a bisphosphonate. For monotherapy patients, concordance between clinic- and patient-reported medication use was lowest for patients prescribed estrogen therapy (70%) or calcium/vitamin D (72%). Obstetrician/gynecologists enrolled younger women, who were more likely to use estrogen therapy than patients enrolled by other physicians. The 934 women (19%) prescribed only calcium/vitamin D were younger than women prescribed pharmacologic therapy.

Conclusions

POSSIBLE US™ provides a unique foundation for evaluating longitudinal use of osteoporosis medications and related outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adachi JD (1996) Current treatment options for osteoporosis. J Rheumatol Suppl 45:11–14PubMed Adachi JD (1996) Current treatment options for osteoporosis. J Rheumatol Suppl 45:11–14PubMed
2.
go back to reference Recker RR, Gallager R, MacCosbe PE (2005) Effect of dosing frequency on bisphosphonates medication adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc 80:856–861PubMedCrossRef Recker RR, Gallager R, MacCosbe PE (2005) Effect of dosing frequency on bisphosphonates medication adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc 80:856–861PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF et al (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15:1003–1008PubMedCrossRef Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF et al (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15:1003–1008PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C et al (2004) Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas 48:271–287PubMedCrossRef McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C et al (2004) Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas 48:271–287PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI et al (2003) Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:965–968PubMedCrossRef Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI et al (2003) Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:965–968PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lo JC, Pressman AR, Omar MA, Ettinger B (2006) Persistence with weekly alendronate therapy among postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 17:922–928PubMedCrossRef Lo JC, Pressman AR, Omar MA, Ettinger B (2006) Persistence with weekly alendronate therapy among postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 17:922–928PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weycker D, Macarios D, Edelsberg J, Oster G (2006) Compliance with drug therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1645–1652PubMedCrossRef Weycker D, Macarios D, Edelsberg J, Oster G (2006) Compliance with drug therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1645–1652PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gold DT (2006) Medication adherence: a challenge for patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and other chronic illnesses. J Manag Care Pharm 12(6) [Suppl A]:S20–S25PubMed Gold DT (2006) Medication adherence: a challenge for patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and other chronic illnesses. J Manag Care Pharm 12(6) [Suppl A]:S20–S25PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM (2007) A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 18:1023–1031PubMedCrossRef Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM (2007) A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 18:1023–1031PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ et al (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonates therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1013–1022PubMedCrossRef Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ et al (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonates therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1013–1022PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ (2006) Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone 38:922–928PubMedCrossRef Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ (2006) Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone 38:922–928PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hamilton B, McCoy K, Taggart H (2003) Tolerability and compliance with risedronate in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 14:259–262PubMed Hamilton B, McCoy K, Taggart H (2003) Tolerability and compliance with risedronate in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 14:259–262PubMed
13.
go back to reference Segal E, Tamir A, Ish-Shalom S (2003) Compliance of osteoporotic patients with different treatment regimens. Isr Med Assoc J 5:859–862PubMed Segal E, Tamir A, Ish-Shalom S (2003) Compliance of osteoporotic patients with different treatment regimens. Isr Med Assoc J 5:859–862PubMed
14.
go back to reference Carnevale V, Nieddu L, Romagnoli E et al (2006) Osteoporosis intervention in ambulatory patients with previous hip fracture: a multicentric, nationwide Italian survey. Osteoporos Int 17:478–483PubMedCrossRef Carnevale V, Nieddu L, Romagnoli E et al (2006) Osteoporosis intervention in ambulatory patients with previous hip fracture: a multicentric, nationwide Italian survey. Osteoporos Int 17:478–483PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rossini M, Bianchi G, Di Munno O et al (2006) Determinants of adherence to osteoporosis treatment in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:914–921PubMedCrossRef Rossini M, Bianchi G, Di Munno O et al (2006) Determinants of adherence to osteoporosis treatment in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:914–921PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stafford RS, Drieling RL, Hersh AL (2004) National trends in osteoporosis visits and osteoporosis treatment, 1988–2003. Arch Intern Med 164:1525–1530PubMedCrossRef Stafford RS, Drieling RL, Hersh AL (2004) National trends in osteoporosis visits and osteoporosis treatment, 1988–2003. Arch Intern Med 164:1525–1530PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Turbi C, Herrero-Beaumont G, Acebes JC et al (2004) Compliance and satisfaction with raloxifene versus alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in clinical practice: an open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. Clin Ther 26:245–256PubMedCrossRef Turbi C, Herrero-Beaumont G, Acebes JC et al (2004) Compliance and satisfaction with raloxifene versus alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in clinical practice: an open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. Clin Ther 26:245–256PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison JJ et al (2006) Channeling and adherence with alendronate and risedronate among chronic glucocorticoid users. Osteoporosis Int 17:1268–1274CrossRef Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison JJ et al (2006) Channeling and adherence with alendronate and risedronate among chronic glucocorticoid users. Osteoporosis Int 17:1268–1274CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Downey TW, Foltz SH, Boccuzzi SJ et al (2006) Adherence and persistence associated with the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis in a managed care setting. South Med J 99:570–575PubMedCrossRef Downey TW, Foltz SH, Boccuzzi SJ et al (2006) Adherence and persistence associated with the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis in a managed care setting. South Med J 99:570–575PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Silverman SL, Watts NB, Delmas PD et al (2007) Effectiveness of bisphosphonates on nonvertebral and hip fractures in the first year of therapy: the risedronate and alendronate (REAL) cohort study. Osteoporos Int 18:25–34PubMedCrossRef Silverman SL, Watts NB, Delmas PD et al (2007) Effectiveness of bisphosphonates on nonvertebral and hip fractures in the first year of therapy: the risedronate and alendronate (REAL) cohort study. Osteoporos Int 18:25–34PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Atkinson M, Sinha A, Hass SL et al (2004) Validation of general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:12PubMedCrossRef Atkinson M, Sinha A, Hass SL et al (2004) Validation of general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:12PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Silverman SL (2000) The osteoporosis assessment questionnaire (OPAQ): a reliable and valid disease-targeted measure of health related quality of life (HRQOL) in osteoporosis. Qual Life Res 9:767–774CrossRef Silverman SL (2000) The osteoporosis assessment questionnaire (OPAQ): a reliable and valid disease-targeted measure of health related quality of life (HRQOL) in osteoporosis. Qual Life Res 9:767–774CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Siris ES, Miller P, Barrett-Connor E et al (1998) Design of NORA, the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Program: a longitudinal US registry of postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 8 [Suppl 1]:S62–S69PubMed Siris ES, Miller P, Barrett-Connor E et al (1998) Design of NORA, the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Program: a longitudinal US registry of postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 8 [Suppl 1]:S62–S69PubMed
25.
go back to reference Weiss TW, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E et al (2007) Osteoporosis practice patterns in 2006 among primary care physicians participating in the NORA study. Osteoporos Int 18:1473–1480PubMedCrossRef Weiss TW, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E et al (2007) Osteoporosis practice patterns in 2006 among primary care physicians participating in the NORA study. Osteoporos Int 18:1473–1480PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Design of the POSSIBLE US™ Study: postmenopausal women’s compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications
Authors
E. Barrett-Connor
K. Ensrud
A. N. A. Tosteson
S. F. Varon
M. Anthony
N. Daizadeh
S. Wade
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0674-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Osteoporosis International 3/2009 Go to the issue

Acknowledgement to Reviewers

Reviewers 2008