Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Knee

Post-operative Oxford knee score can be used to indicate whether patient expectations have been achieved after primary total knee arthroplasty

Authors: N. D. Clement, D. MacDonald, J. T. Patton, R. Burnett

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify threshold values in the post-operative Oxford knee score (OKS) and change in the score for achievement of specific patient expectations and satisfaction, and whether failure to meet specific patient expectations influenced the rate of satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Prospectively complied data for 322 primary TKA were used. Patient demographics, and pre- and post-operative (1 year) OKS, and expectation fulfilment were collected. Patient satisfaction was also assessed 1 year post-operatively.

Results

Patient pre-operative expectations varied in prevalence and differed according to gender, age, and severity of knee symptoms according the OKS. Fulfilment of patient expectations was variable and was dependent upon the specific expectation; the majority of patients achieved their expectation of pain relief and improved ability to walk (>70 %), however, few fulfilled their expectation to kneel or squat (<25 %). The threshold according to the post-operative OKS at which these expectations were achieved varied by more than ten points, ranging from ≥31 for pain relief to ≥42 for kneeling. Failure to fulfil patient expectations, for 15 of the 17 assessed, significantly increased the risk of dissatisfaction at 1 year (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The post-operative OKS can be used to predict the point at which the greatest proportion of patient expectations is achieved. Some expectations, however, are rarely fulfilled after a TKA and patients should be made aware of this pre-operatively which may improve their satisfaction post-operatively.

Level of evidence

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Baker PN, Deehan DJ, Lees D, Jameson S, Avery PJ, Gregg PJ, Reed MR (2012) The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1058–1066CrossRefPubMed Baker PN, Deehan DJ, Lees D, Jameson S, Avery PJ, Gregg PJ, Reed MR (2012) The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1058–1066CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Becker R, Doring C, Denecke A, Brosz M (2011) Expectation, satisfaction and clinical outcome of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1433–1441CrossRefPubMed Becker R, Doring C, Denecke A, Brosz M (2011) Expectation, satisfaction and clinical outcome of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1433–1441CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bonnin MP, Basiglini L, Archbold HA (2011) What are the factors of residual pain after uncomplicated TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1411–1417CrossRefPubMed Bonnin MP, Basiglini L, Archbold HA (2011) What are the factors of residual pain after uncomplicated TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1411–1417CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ (2012) Knee replacement. Lancet 379:1331–1340CrossRefPubMed Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ (2012) Knee replacement. Lancet 379:1331–1340CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC (2011) The outcome of primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients aged 80 years or more. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1265–1270CrossRefPubMed Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC (2011) The outcome of primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients aged 80 years or more. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1265–1270CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Culliford DJ, Maskell J, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Price AJ, Arden NK (2010) Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991–2006. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:130–135CrossRefPubMed Culliford DJ, Maskell J, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Price AJ, Arden NK (2010) Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991–2006. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:130–135CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Culliton SE, Bryant DM, Overend TJ, MacDonald SJ, Chesworth BM (2012) The relationship between expectations and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:490–492CrossRefPubMed Culliton SE, Bryant DM, Overend TJ, MacDonald SJ, Chesworth BM (2012) The relationship between expectations and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:490–492CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cushnaghan J, Bennett J, Reading I, Croft P, Byng P, Cox K, Dieppe P, Coggon D, Cooper C (2009) Long-term outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a controlled longitudinal study. Ann Rheum Dis 68:642–647CrossRefPubMed Cushnaghan J, Bennett J, Reading I, Croft P, Byng P, Cox K, Dieppe P, Coggon D, Cooper C (2009) Long-term outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a controlled longitudinal study. Ann Rheum Dis 68:642–647CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ (2010) The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ 340:c186CrossRefPubMed Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ (2010) The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ 340:c186CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:63–69CrossRefPubMed Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:63–69CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149–158CrossRefPubMed Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149–158CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jenkins PJ, Clement ND, Hamilton DF, Gaston P, Patton JT, Howie CR (2013) Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: a health economic analysis. Bone Joint J 95-B:115–121CrossRefPubMed Jenkins PJ, Clement ND, Hamilton DF, Gaston P, Patton JT, Howie CR (2013) Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: a health economic analysis. Bone Joint J 95-B:115–121CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Judge A, Arden NK, Kiran A, Price A, Javaid MK, Beard D, Murray D, Field RE (2012) Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:412–418CrossRefPubMed Judge A, Arden NK, Kiran A, Price A, Javaid MK, Beard D, Murray D, Field RE (2012) Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:412–418CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kennedy DM, Hanna SE, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD (2006) Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:559–566CrossRefPubMed Kennedy DM, Hanna SE, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD (2006) Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:559–566CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID (2006) Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1201–1207CrossRefPubMed Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID (2006) Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1201–1207CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM, Peterson MG, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, Sculco TP (2008) Randomized trials to modify patients’ preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:424–431CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM, Peterson MG, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, Sculco TP (2008) Randomized trials to modify patients’ preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:424–431CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P (2001) Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1005–1012PubMed Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P (2001) Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1005–1012PubMed
23.
go back to reference Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB (2006) The John Insall award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:35–43CrossRefPubMed Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB (2006) The John Insall award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:35–43CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C (2010) Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:508–512CrossRefPubMed Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C (2010) Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:508–512CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, Garellick G (2011) Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 3):66–71CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, Garellick G (2011) Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 3):66–71CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM (2010) An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:413–418CrossRefPubMed Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM (2010) An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:413–418CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Scott CE, Bugler KE, Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC (2012) Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:974–981CrossRefPubMed Scott CE, Bugler KE, Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC (2012) Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:974–981CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1253–1258CrossRefPubMed Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1253–1258CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Yoo JH, Chang CB, Kang YG, Kim SJ, Seong SC, Kim TK (2011) Patient expectations of total knee replacement and their association with sociodemographic factors and functional status. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:337–344CrossRefPubMed Yoo JH, Chang CB, Kang YG, Kim SJ, Seong SC, Kim TK (2011) Patient expectations of total knee replacement and their association with sociodemographic factors and functional status. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:337–344CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Post-operative Oxford knee score can be used to indicate whether patient expectations have been achieved after primary total knee arthroplasty
Authors
N. D. Clement
D. MacDonald
J. T. Patton
R. Burnett
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2865-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2015 Go to the issue