Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Knee

Lateral tibial plateau autograft in revision surgery for failed medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Authors: Simone Cerciello, Brent Joseph Morris, Sebastien Lustig, Enrico Visonà, Giuliano Cerciello, Katia Corona, Philippe Neyret

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with bone loss is challenging. Several options are available including cement augmentation, metal augmentation, and bone grafting. The aim of the present study was to describe a surgical technique for lateral tibial plateau autografting and report mid-term outcomes.

Methods

Eleven consecutive patients (median age 69.5 years) affected by posteromedial tibial plateau collapse after medial UKA were enrolled in the present study. The delay between UKA and revision surgery was 21 months (range 15–36 months). All patients were revised with a cemented posterior-stabilized implant, with a tibial stem. Medial tibial plateau bone loss was treated with an autologous lateral tibial plateau bone graft secured with two absorbable screws. All patients were evaluated with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), and complete radiographic evaluation.

Results

At a median follow-up of 60 months (range 36–84 months), the OKS improved from 21.5 (range 16–26) to 34.5 (range 30–40) (p < 0.01) and the median VAS score improved from 8.0 (range 5–9) to 5.5 (range 3–7) (p < 0.01). No intraoperative complications were recorded. Partial reabsorption of the graft was observed in two cases at final follow-up.

Conclusion

Lateral tibial plateau bone autograft is an alternative to metal wedge or cement augments in the treatment of medial plateau collapse after UKA. Primary fixation of the tibial plateau autograft can be achieved with absorbable screws and a tibial-stemmed implant. Further comparative studies with a larger series may be helpful to draw definitive conclusions.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barrett WP, Scott RD (1987) Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1328–1335CrossRefPubMed Barrett WP, Scott RD (1987) Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1328–1335CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brandes M, Ringling M, Winter C, Hillmann A, Rosenbaum D (2010) Changes in physical activity and health-related quality of life during the first year after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(3):328–334 Brandes M, Ringling M, Winter C, Hillmann A, Rosenbaum D (2010) Changes in physical activity and health-related quality of life during the first year after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(3):328–334
3.
go back to reference Bruni D, Akkawi I, Iacono F, Raspugli GF, Gagliardi M, Nitri M, Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Marcacci M (2013) Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2462–2467CrossRefPubMed Bruni D, Akkawi I, Iacono F, Raspugli GF, Gagliardi M, Nitri M, Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Marcacci M (2013) Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2462–2467CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chakrabarty G, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE (1998) Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 13(2):191–196CrossRefPubMed Chakrabarty G, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE (1998) Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 13(2):191–196CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80(1):63–69CrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80(1):63–69CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE, Davidson DC, de Steiger RN, Miller LN (2010) Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 81(1):95–98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE, Davidson DC, de Steiger RN, Miller LN (2010) Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 81(1):95–98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Levine WN, Ozuna RM, Scott RD, Thornhill T (1996) Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(7):797–801CrossRefPubMed Levine WN, Ozuna RM, Scott RD, Thornhill T (1996) Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(7):797–801CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 69(5):469–474CrossRefPubMed Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 69(5):469–474CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Martin J, Wallace D, Woods D, Carr AJ, Murray DW (1995) Revision of unicondylar knee replacements to total knee replacement. Knee 2(2):121–125CrossRef Martin J, Wallace D, Woods D, Carr AJ, Murray DW (1995) Revision of unicondylar knee replacements to total knee replacement. Knee 2(2):121–125CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (2001) Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:279–282CrossRef McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (2001) Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:279–282CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Niinimäki T, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä K, Ohtonen P, Puhto AP, Remes V (2014) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(5):1496–1501CrossRefPubMed Niinimäki T, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä K, Ohtonen P, Puhto AP, Remes V (2014) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(5):1496–1501CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Padgett DE, Stern SH, Insall JN (1991) Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:186–190CrossRefPubMed Padgett DE, Stern SH, Insall JN (1991) Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:186–190CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C (2010) Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(4):508–512CrossRefPubMed Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C (2010) Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(4):508–512CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pietschmann MF, Ficklscherer A, Wohlleb L, Schmidutz F, Jansson V, Müller PE (2014) UKA can be safely revised to primary knee arthroplasty by using an autologous bone plate from the proximal lateral tibia. J Arthroplasty 29(10):1991–1995CrossRefPubMed Pietschmann MF, Ficklscherer A, Wohlleb L, Schmidutz F, Jansson V, Müller PE (2014) UKA can be safely revised to primary knee arthroplasty by using an autologous bone plate from the proximal lateral tibia. J Arthroplasty 29(10):1991–1995CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Revell PA (2008) The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses. J R Soc Interface 5:1263–1278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Revell PA (2008) The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses. J R Soc Interface 5:1263–1278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Robb CA, Matharu GS, Baloch K, Pynset PB (2013) Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement: technical aspects and clinical outcome. Acta Orthop Belg 79:312–317PubMed Robb CA, Matharu GS, Baloch K, Pynset PB (2013) Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement: technical aspects and clinical outcome. Acta Orthop Belg 79:312–317PubMed
17.
go back to reference Saldanha KA, Keys GW, Svard UC, White RH, Rao C (2007) Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty—results of a multicentre study. Knee 14(4):275–279CrossRefPubMed Saldanha KA, Keys GW, Svard UC, White RH, Rao C (2007) Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty—results of a multicentre study. Knee 14(4):275–279CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Saragaglia D, Estour G, Nemer C, Colle PE (2009) Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results. Int Orthop 33(4):969–974CrossRefPubMed Saragaglia D, Estour G, Nemer C, Colle PE (2009) Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results. Int Orthop 33(4):969–974CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Shi HF, Xiong J, Chen YX, Wang JF, Qiu XS, Wang YH, Qiu Y (2013) Early application of pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of postoperative delayed union of long-bone fractures: a prospective randomized controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(14):35CrossRef Shi HF, Xiong J, Chen YX, Wang JF, Qiu XS, Wang YH, Qiu Y (2013) Early application of pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of postoperative delayed union of long-bone fractures: a prospective randomized controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(14):35CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Springer BD, Scott RD, Thornhill TS (2006) Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:214–220CrossRefPubMed Springer BD, Scott RD, Thornhill TS (2006) Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:214–220CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tinius M, Klima S, Marquass B, Tinius W, Josten C (2006) Revision possibilities after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an analysis of 116 revisions. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 144(4):367–372CrossRefPubMed Tinius M, Klima S, Marquass B, Tinius W, Josten C (2006) Revision possibilities after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an analysis of 116 revisions. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 144(4):367–372CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Lateral tibial plateau autograft in revision surgery for failed medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Authors
Simone Cerciello
Brent Joseph Morris
Sebastien Lustig
Enrico Visonà
Giuliano Cerciello
Katia Corona
Philippe Neyret
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3610-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2017 Go to the issue