Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Article

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases

Authors: L. Franceschilli, D. Varvaras, I. Capuano, C. I. Ciangola, F. Giorgi, G. Boehm, A. L. Gaspari, P. Sileri

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVR) is gaining wider acceptance as the preferred procedure to correct internal as well as external rectal prolapse associated with obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence. Very few reports exist on the use of biologic mesh for LVR. The aim of our study was to report the complication and recurrence rate of our first 100 cases of LVR for symptomatic internal rectal prolapse and/or rectocele using a porcine dermal collagen mesh.

Methods

Prospectively collected data on LVR for internal rectal prolapse were analysed. Surgical complications and functional results in terms of faecal incontinence (measured with the Faecal Incontinence Severity Index = FISI) and constipation (measured with the Wexner Constipation Score = WCS) at 3, 6 and 12 months were analysed. It was considered an improvement if FISI or WCS scores were reduced by at least 25 % and a cure if the FISI score decreased to <10 and the WCS decreased to <5.

Results

Between April 2009 and April 2013, 100 consecutive female patients (mean age 63 years, range 24–88 years) underwent LVR. All patients had internal rectal prolapse (grade III [n = 25] and grade IV [n = 75] according to the Oxford classification) and rectocele. Mean operative time was 85 ± 40 min. Conversion rate to open technique was 1 %. There was no post-operative mortality. Overall 16 patients (16 %) experienced 18 complications, including rectal perforation (n = 1), small bowel obstruction (n = 2), urinary tract infection (n = 8), subcutaneous emphysema (n = 3), wound haematoma (n = 2), long lasting sacral pain (n = 1) and incisional hernia (1). Median post-operative length of stay was 2 days. Ninety-eight out of 100 patients completed follow-up. At the end of follow-up, the mean FISI score improved from 8.4 (±4.0 standard deviation (SD) p = 0.003) to 3.3 ± 2.3 SD (p = 0.04). Incontinence improved in 37 out of 43 patients (86 %), and 31 patients (72 %) were cured. Similarly, the mean WCS score improved from 18.4 ± 11.6 SD to 5.4 ± 4.1 SD (p = 0.04). Constipation improved in 82 out of 89 patients (92 %), and 70 patients (79 %) were cured. No worsening of continence status, constipation or sexual function was observed. Fourteen patients (14 %) experienced persistence or recurrence of prolapse.

Conclusions

LVR using biologic mesh is a safe and effective procedure for improving symptoms of obstructed defaecation and faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse associated with rectocele.
Literature
1.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505CrossRefPubMed D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Penninckx F (2006) Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20:1919–1923CrossRefPubMed D’Hoore A, Penninckx F (2006) Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20:1919–1923CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I (2001) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorectal Dis 13:561–566CrossRef Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I (2001) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorectal Dis 13:561–566CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Collinson R, Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Lindsey I (2010) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse: short-term functional results. Colorectal Dis 12:97–104CrossRefPubMed Collinson R, Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Lindsey I (2010) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse: short-term functional results. Colorectal Dis 12:97–104CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Auguste T, Dubreuil A, Bost R, Bonaz B, Faucheron JL (2006) Technical and functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory for complete rectal prolapse. Prospective study in 54 consecutive patients. Gastroenterol Clin Boil 30:659–663CrossRef Auguste T, Dubreuil A, Bost R, Bonaz B, Faucheron JL (2006) Technical and functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory for complete rectal prolapse. Prospective study in 54 consecutive patients. Gastroenterol Clin Boil 30:659–663CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Abet E, Lehur PA, Wong M (2012) Sexual function and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complex rectocoele. Colorectal Dis 14:721–726CrossRef Abet E, Lehur PA, Wong M (2012) Sexual function and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complex rectocoele. Colorectal Dis 14:721–726CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ahmad M, Sileri P, Franceschilli L (2012) The role of biologics in pelvic floor surgery. Colorectal Dis 14(Suppl 3):19–23CrossRefPubMed Ahmad M, Sileri P, Franceschilli L (2012) The role of biologics in pelvic floor surgery. Colorectal Dis 14(Suppl 3):19–23CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Wahed S, Ahmad M, Mohiuddin K, Katory M, Mercer-Jones M (2012) Short term results for laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Colorectal Dis 14:1242–1247CrossRefPubMed Wahed S, Ahmad M, Mohiuddin K, Katory M, Mercer-Jones M (2012) Short term results for laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Colorectal Dis 14:1242–1247CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sileri P, Franceschilli L, De Luca E (2012) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biologic mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 16:622–628CrossRefPubMed Sileri P, Franceschilli L, De Luca E (2012) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biologic mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 16:622–628CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Smart NJ, Pathak S, Boorman P (2013) Synthetic or biologic mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy-a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 15:650–654CrossRefPubMed Smart NJ, Pathak S, Boorman P (2013) Synthetic or biologic mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy-a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 15:650–654CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Boons P, Collinson R, Cunningham C, Lindsey I (2010) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation. Colorectal Dis 12:526–532CrossRefPubMed Boons P, Collinson R, Cunningham C, Lindsey I (2010) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation. Colorectal Dis 12:526–532CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sileri P, Franceschilli L, Gaspari AL (2012) Saving time stitching thick biologic mesh during laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 16:393–394CrossRefPubMed Sileri P, Franceschilli L, Gaspari AL (2012) Saving time stitching thick biologic mesh during laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 16:393–394CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Koch SM, Melenhorst J, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2008) Prospective study of colonic irrigation for the treatment of defaecation disorders. Br J Surg 95:1273–1279CrossRefPubMed Koch SM, Melenhorst J, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2008) Prospective study of colonic irrigation for the treatment of defaecation disorders. Br J Surg 95:1273–1279CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van den Esschert JW, van Geloven AA, Vermulst N, Groenedijk AG, de Wit LT, Gerhards MF (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation syndrome. Surg Endosc 22:2728–2732CrossRefPubMed van den Esschert JW, van Geloven AA, Vermulst N, Groenedijk AG, de Wit LT, Gerhards MF (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation syndrome. Surg Endosc 22:2728–2732CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A (2000) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD001758 Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A (2000) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD001758
17.
go back to reference Formijne Jonkers HA, Poierrié N, Draaisma WA (2013) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectocele: an analysis of 245 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 15:695–699CrossRefPubMed Formijne Jonkers HA, Poierrié N, Draaisma WA (2013) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and symptomatic rectocele: an analysis of 245 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 15:695–699CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Ferron M (2013) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective long-term evaluation of functional results and quality of life. Tech Coloproctol 17:431–436CrossRefPubMed Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Ferron M (2013) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective long-term evaluation of functional results and quality of life. Tech Coloproctol 17:431–436CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Prasad ML, Pearl RK, Abcarian H, Orsay CP, Nelson RL (1986) Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 29:547–552CrossRefPubMed Prasad ML, Pearl RK, Abcarian H, Orsay CP, Nelson RL (1986) Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 29:547–552CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Smart NJ, Mercer-Jones MA (2007) Functional outcome after transperineal rectocele repair with porcine dermal collagen implant. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1422–1427CrossRefPubMed Smart NJ, Mercer-Jones MA (2007) Functional outcome after transperineal rectocele repair with porcine dermal collagen implant. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1422–1427CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 12:504–512CrossRefPubMed Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 12:504–512CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Faucheron JL, Voirin D, Riboud R et al (2012) Laparoscopic anterior rectopexy to the promontory for full-thickness rectal prolapse in 175 consecutive patients: short- and long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 55:660–665CrossRefPubMed Faucheron JL, Voirin D, Riboud R et al (2012) Laparoscopic anterior rectopexy to the promontory for full-thickness rectal prolapse in 175 consecutive patients: short- and long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 55:660–665CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference William C, Cirocco MD (2010) Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse: an operation for all ages. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1618–1623CrossRef William C, Cirocco MD (2010) Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse: an operation for all ages. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1618–1623CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Duthie GS, Bartolo DC (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 79:107–113CrossRefPubMed Duthie GS, Bartolo DC (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 79:107–113CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Riansuwan W, Hull TL, Bast J, Hammel JP, Church JM (2010) Comparison of perineal operations with abdominal operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse. World J Surg 34:1116–1122CrossRefPubMed Riansuwan W, Hull TL, Bast J, Hammel JP, Church JM (2010) Comparison of perineal operations with abdominal operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse. World J Surg 34:1116–1122CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rexnik Z, Vishne TH, Kristt D, Alper D, Ramadan E (2001) Rectal prolapse: a possible under-recognized complication of anorexia nervosa amenable to surgical correction. Int J Psychiatry Med 31:347–352CrossRef Rexnik Z, Vishne TH, Kristt D, Alper D, Ramadan E (2001) Rectal prolapse: a possible under-recognized complication of anorexia nervosa amenable to surgical correction. Int J Psychiatry Med 31:347–352CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sileri P, Iacoangeli F, Staar F et al (2012) Nervosa anorexia leads to defaecatory disorders compared to general population. Gastroenterology 5:S1072–S1073 Sileri P, Iacoangeli F, Staar F et al (2012) Nervosa anorexia leads to defaecatory disorders compared to general population. Gastroenterology 5:S1072–S1073
29.
go back to reference Silvis R, Gooszen HG, van Essen A, de Kruif AT, Janssen LW (1999) Abdominal rectovaginopexy: modified technique to treat constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 42:82–88CrossRefPubMed Silvis R, Gooszen HG, van Essen A, de Kruif AT, Janssen LW (1999) Abdominal rectovaginopexy: modified technique to treat constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 42:82–88CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Verdaasdonk EG, Bueno de Mesquita JM, Stassen LP (2006) Laparoscopic rectovaginopexy for rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 10:318–322CrossRefPubMed Verdaasdonk EG, Bueno de Mesquita JM, Stassen LP (2006) Laparoscopic rectovaginopexy for rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 10:318–322CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Portier G, Iovino F, Lazorthes F (2006) Surgery for rectal prolapse: orr-Loygue ventral rectopexy with limited dissection prevents postoperative-induced constipation without increasing recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1136–1140CrossRefPubMed Portier G, Iovino F, Lazorthes F (2006) Surgery for rectal prolapse: orr-Loygue ventral rectopexy with limited dissection prevents postoperative-induced constipation without increasing recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1136–1140CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Yakut M, Kaymakcioglu N, Simsek A, Tan A, Sen D (1998) Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. A retrospective analysis of 94 cases. Int Surg 83:53–55PubMed Yakut M, Kaymakcioglu N, Simsek A, Tan A, Sen D (1998) Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. A retrospective analysis of 94 cases. Int Surg 83:53–55PubMed
33.
go back to reference Lechaux JP, Lechaux D, Perz M (1995) Results of Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantages of modified technique. Dis Colon Rectum 38:301–307CrossRefPubMed Lechaux JP, Lechaux D, Perz M (1995) Results of Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantages of modified technique. Dis Colon Rectum 38:301–307CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2007) Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1275–1285CrossRefPubMed Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2007) Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1275–1285CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Clearhout F, De Ridder D, Van Beckevoort D et al (2010) Sacrocolpopexy using xenogenic acellular collagen in patients at increased risk for graft-related complications. Neurourol Urodynam 29:563–567 Clearhout F, De Ridder D, Van Beckevoort D et al (2010) Sacrocolpopexy using xenogenic acellular collagen in patients at increased risk for graft-related complications. Neurourol Urodynam 29:563–567
36.
go back to reference Peppas G, Gkegkes ID, Makris MC, Falagas ME (2010) Biologic mesh in hernia repair, abdominal wall defects, and reconstruction and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of the clinical evidence. Am Surg 76:1290–1299PubMed Peppas G, Gkegkes ID, Makris MC, Falagas ME (2010) Biologic mesh in hernia repair, abdominal wall defects, and reconstruction and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of the clinical evidence. Am Surg 76:1290–1299PubMed
37.
go back to reference Athanasiadis S, Weyand G, Heiligers J (1996) The risk of infection of three synthetic materials used in rectopexy with or without colonic resection for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:42–44CrossRefPubMed Athanasiadis S, Weyand G, Heiligers J (1996) The risk of infection of three synthetic materials used in rectopexy with or without colonic resection for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:42–44CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Hamoudi-Badrek A, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2013) How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR): lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre. Colorectal Dis 15:707–712CrossRef Hamoudi-Badrek A, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2013) How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR): lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre. Colorectal Dis 15:707–712CrossRef
39.
go back to reference FDA Safety Communication (2011) UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. July 13, 2011 FDA Safety Communication (2011) UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. July 13, 2011
40.
go back to reference Franklin ME Jr, Treviño JM, Portillo G, Vela I, Glass JL, González JJ (2008) The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 22:1941–1946CrossRefPubMed Franklin ME Jr, Treviño JM, Portillo G, Vela I, Glass JL, González JJ (2008) The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 22:1941–1946CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME et al, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (2011) Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the trial of midurethral sling (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:498.e1–498.e6 Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME et al, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (2011) Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the trial of midurethral sling (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:498.e1–498.e6
42.
go back to reference Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti d’Urso A (2007) A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ‘iceberg diagram’. Colorectal Dis 9:452–456CrossRefPubMed Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti d’Urso A (2007) A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ‘iceberg diagram’. Colorectal Dis 9:452–456CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases
Authors
L. Franceschilli
D. Varvaras
I. Capuano
C. I. Ciangola
F. Giorgi
G. Boehm
A. L. Gaspari
P. Sileri
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1255-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2015 Go to the issue