Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2005

01-07-2005 | Original article

Is laparoscopic appendectomy in children associated with an uncommon postoperative complication?

Authors: F. Serour, M. Witzling, A. Gorenstein

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is controversial due to the high rate of intraabdominal abscess (IAA). We report a postlaparoscopic appendectomy complication (PLAC) observed in pediatric patients discharged after an uneventful postoperative period.

Methods

In this case series, a review of the medical records of children who underwent LA or open appendectomy (OA) during a 5-year period was performed. The diagnosis of PLAC was based on three well-defined criteria: time of appearance, clinical and laboratory findings, and ultrasonographic characteristic features.

Results

A total of 374 patients underwent appendectomy (LA, 129 patients; OA, 245 patients). One patient with conversion of LA to OA and 35 patients with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (seven from the LA group and 28 from the OA group) were excluded from the study. After LA, nine children developed intraabdominal complications during their hospitalization (six infiltrate in the right lower quadrant and three IAA); these were also excluded. Discharge from the department was done when three conditions were fulfilled: normal body temperature, normal leukocyte count, and passage of a stool. Among the 112 LA patients, PLAC was observed in 15 (13.4%), aged 12.5 ± 2.9 years, who were discharged after LA in 2.7 ± 0.9 days. Number of PLAC and time of its appearance were not significantly different in patients with normal or pathological appendix. Sonographic findings of PLAC at admission were fluid alone (n = 11), edematous mesenteric fat (n = 7), thickening of bowel wall (n = 9), and more than one sign (n = 9). At repeated sonography, these signs were present in all patients, and IAA developed in one of them. All children were successfully treated with antibiotics for 10.1 ± 3.9 days, one of whom underwent a CT-guided percutaneous drainage for IAA.

Conclusions

PLAC may be the result of a slow development of local interstitial infection in the ileocecal area due to mesothelial damage caused by CO2 pneumoperitoneum and local thermal effect produced by energized systems. This may explain its delayed appearance and the efficacy of the antibiotic treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bloechle, C, Kluth, D, Holstein, A-F, Emmermann, A, Strate, T, Zornig, C, Izbicki, JR 1999A pneumoperitoneum perpetuates severe damage to the ultrastructural integrity of parietal peritoneum in gastric perforation-induced peritonitis in ratsSurg Endosc13683688CrossRefPubMed Bloechle, C, Kluth, D, Holstein, A-F, Emmermann, A, Strate, T, Zornig, C, Izbicki, JR 1999A pneumoperitoneum perpetuates severe damage to the ultrastructural integrity of parietal peritoneum in gastric perforation-induced peritonitis in ratsSurg Endosc13683688CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bonanni, F, Reed, J, Hartzell, G, Trostle, D, Boorse, R, Gittleman, M, Cole, A 1994Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomyJ Am Coll Surg179273278PubMed Bonanni, F, Reed, J, Hartzell, G, Trostle, D, Boorse, R, Gittleman, M, Cole, A 1994Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomyJ Am Coll Surg179273278PubMed
3.
go back to reference Campbell, PA, Cresswell, AB, Frank, TG, Cuschieri, A 2003Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissectionSurg Endosc1716401645CrossRefPubMed Campbell, PA, Cresswell, AB, Frank, TG, Cuschieri, A 2003Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissectionSurg Endosc1716401645CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Glasgow, RE, Fingerhut, A, Hunter, J 2003SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summarySurg Endosc1717291734CrossRefPubMed Glasgow, RE, Fingerhut, A, Hunter, J 2003SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summarySurg Endosc1717291734CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Golub, R, Siddiqui, F, Pohl, D 1998Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysisJ Am Coll Surg186545553CrossRefPubMed Golub, R, Siddiqui, F, Pohl, D 1998Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysisJ Am Coll Surg186545553CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gorenstein, A, Serour, F, Katz, R, Usviatsov, I 1996Appendiceal colic in children: a true clinical entity?J Am Coll Surg182246250PubMed Gorenstein, A, Serour, F, Katz, R, Usviatsov, I 1996Appendiceal colic in children: a true clinical entity?J Am Coll Surg182246250PubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Hoenig, DM, Chrostek, CA, Amaral, JF 1996Laparoscopic coagulating shears: alternative methods of hemostatic control of unsupported tissueJ Endourol10431433PubMed Hoenig, DM, Chrostek, CA, Amaral, JF 1996Laparoscopic coagulating shears: alternative methods of hemostatic control of unsupported tissueJ Endourol10431433PubMed
9.
go back to reference Horwitz, JR, Custer, MD, May, BH, Mehall, JR, Lally, KP 1997Should laparoscopic appendectomy be avoided for complicated appendicitis in children?J Pediatr Surg3216011603CrossRefPubMed Horwitz, JR, Custer, MD, May, BH, Mehall, JR, Lally, KP 1997Should laparoscopic appendectomy be avoided for complicated appendicitis in children?J Pediatr Surg3216011603CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ignacio, RC, Burke, R, Spencer, D, Bissell, C, Dorsainvil, C, Lucha, PA 2004Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trialSurg Endosc18334337CrossRefPubMed Ignacio, RC, Burke, R, Spencer, D, Bissell, C, Dorsainvil, C, Lucha, PA 2004Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trialSurg Endosc18334337CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kennedy, JS, Stranahan, PL, Taylor, KD, Chandler, JG 1998High burst strength, feed-back controlled bipolar vessel sealingSurg Endosc12876878CrossRefPubMed Kennedy, JS, Stranahan, PL, Taylor, KD, Chandler, JG 1998High burst strength, feed-back controlled bipolar vessel sealingSurg Endosc12876878CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kinoshita, T, Kanehira, E, Omura, K, Kawakami, K, Watanabe, Y 1999Experimental study on heat production by a 23.5 kHz ultrasonically activated device for endoscopic surgerySurg Endosc13621625CrossRefPubMed Kinoshita, T, Kanehira, E, Omura, K, Kawakami, K, Watanabe, Y 1999Experimental study on heat production by a 23.5 kHz ultrasonically activated device for endoscopic surgerySurg Endosc13621625CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Krisher, SL, Browne, A, Dibbins, A, Tkacz, N, Curci, M 2001Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitisArch Surg136438431CrossRefPubMed Krisher, SL, Browne, A, Dibbins, A, Tkacz, N, Curci, M 2001Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitisArch Surg136438431CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Long, KH, Bannon, MP, Zietlow, SP, Helgeson, ER, Harmsen, WS, Smith, CD, Ilstrup, DM, Baerga-Varela, Y, Sarr, MG 2001A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analysesSurgery129390400CrossRefPubMed Long, KH, Bannon, MP, Zietlow, SP, Helgeson, ER, Harmsen, WS, Smith, CD, Ilstrup, DM, Baerga-Varela, Y, Sarr, MG 2001A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analysesSurgery129390400CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference McKinlay, R, Neeleman, S, Klein, R, Stevens, K, Greenfeld, J, Ghory, M, Cosentino, C 2003Intraabdominal abscess following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric populationSurg Endosc17730733CrossRefPubMed McKinlay, R, Neeleman, S, Klein, R, Stevens, K, Greenfeld, J, Ghory, M, Cosentino, C 2003Intraabdominal abscess following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric populationSurg Endosc17730733CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Neuhaus, SJ, Watson, DI 2004Pneumoperitoneum and peritoneal surface changesA review. Surg Endosc1813161322CrossRef Neuhaus, SJ, Watson, DI 2004Pneumoperitoneum and peritoneal surface changesA review. Surg Endosc1813161322CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Oka, T, Kurkchubasche, AG, Bussey, JG, Wesselhoeft, CW, Tracy, TF, Luks, FI 2004Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in childrenSurg Endosc18242245CrossRefPubMed Oka, T, Kurkchubasche, AG, Bussey, JG, Wesselhoeft, CW, Tracy, TF, Luks, FI 2004Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in childrenSurg Endosc18242245CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ortega, AE, Hunter, JG, Peters, JH, Swanstrom, LL, Schirmer, B 1995A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study GroupAm J Surg169208212CrossRefPubMed Ortega, AE, Hunter, JG, Peters, JH, Swanstrom, LL, Schirmer, B 1995A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study GroupAm J Surg169208212CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Pedersen, AG, Petersen, OB, Wara, P, Ronning, H, Qvist, N, Laurberg, S 2001Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomyBr J Surg88200205CrossRefPubMed Pedersen, AG, Petersen, OB, Wara, P, Ronning, H, Qvist, N, Laurberg, S 2001Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomyBr J Surg88200205CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EAM (2003) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Wiley, Chichester, UK Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EAM (2003) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Wiley, Chichester, UK
22.
go back to reference Serour, F, Efrati, Y, Klin, B, Barr, J, Gorenstein, A, Vinograd, I 1996Subcuticular skin closure as a standard approach to emergency appendectomy in children. A prospective clinical trialWorld J Surg203842CrossRefPubMed Serour, F, Efrati, Y, Klin, B, Barr, J, Gorenstein, A, Vinograd, I 1996Subcuticular skin closure as a standard approach to emergency appendectomy in children. A prospective clinical trialWorld J Surg203842CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tang, E, Ortega, AE, Anthone, GJ, Beart, RW 1996Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomiesSurg Endosc10327328CrossRefPubMed Tang, E, Ortega, AE, Anthone, GJ, Beart, RW 1996Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomiesSurg Endosc10327328CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Volz, J, Koster, S, Spacek, Z, Paweletz, N 1999Characteristic alterations of the peritoneum after carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneumSurg Endosc13611614CrossRefPubMed Volz, J, Koster, S, Spacek, Z, Paweletz, N 1999Characteristic alterations of the peritoneum after carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneumSurg Endosc13611614CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Is laparoscopic appendectomy in children associated with an uncommon postoperative complication?
Authors
F. Serour
M. Witzling
A. Gorenstein
Publication date
01-07-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2195-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2005 Go to the issue

EditorialNotes

News and notices