Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2011

01-08-2011

Is It Possible to Predict Heart Rate and Range during Enhanced Cardiac CT Scan from Previous Non-enhanced Cardiac CT?

Authors: Jun Horiguchi, Hideya Yamamoto, Ryuichi Arie, Masao Kiguchi, Chikako Fujioka, Megu Ohtaki, Yasuki Kihara, Kazuo Awai

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The effect of heart rate and variation during cardiac computed tomography (CT) on the examination quality. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether it is possible to predict heart rate and range during enhanced cardiac computed CT scan from previous non-enhanced cardiac CT scan. Electrocardiograph (ECG) files from 112 patients on three types of cardiac 64-slice CT (non-enhanced, prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated enhanced scans) were recorded. The mean heart rate, range (defined as difference between maximal and minimal heart rates) and the range ratio (defined as maximal heart rate divided by minimal heart rate) during the scans were compared. Scan time was 4.8, 4.6, and 7.3 s on non-enhanced, prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated scans, respectively (p < 0.0001). The heart rates were not significantly different (60 ± 9 beats per minute (bpm), 60 ± 9 and 61 ± 10 bpm; p = 0.64). Heart rate on the enhanced scan markedly correlated with that of the non-enhanced scan (r = 0.78 and 0.74). In contrast, the ranges of heart rate were 2 ± 5, 4 ± 8, and 8 ± 21 bpm, with different range ratios (1.04, 1.07, and 1.14; p < 0.0001). Correlation of heart rate ranges between non-enhanced scan versus prospective ECG-triggered scan was low (r = 0.27) and that between non-enhanced scan versus retrospective ECG-gated scan negligible (r = −0.027).Heart rate on enhanced cardiac CT, in most cases, can be predicted from a non-enhanced scan. Heart rate range on enhanced cardiac CT, however, is hard to predict from the non-enhanced scan.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kroft LJM, de Roos A, Geleijns J: Artifacts in ECG-synchronized MDCT coronary angiography. AJR 189:581–591, 2007PubMedCrossRef Kroft LJM, de Roos A, Geleijns J: Artifacts in ECG-synchronized MDCT coronary angiography. AJR 189:581–591, 2007PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, et al: Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 238:75–86, 2006PubMedCrossRef Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, et al: Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 238:75–86, 2006PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D, et al: Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR 179:911–916, 2002PubMed Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D, et al: Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR 179:911–916, 2002PubMed
4.
go back to reference Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, et al: Image quality, motion artifacts and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol 41:436–442, 2006PubMedCrossRef Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, et al: Image quality, motion artifacts and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol 41:436–442, 2006PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Caussin C, Larchez C, Ghostine S, et al: Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by 64-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 98:871–876, 2006PubMedCrossRef Caussin C, Larchez C, Ghostine S, et al: Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by 64-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 98:871–876, 2006PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Leschka S, Scheffel H, Husmann L, et al: Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR 190:1583–1590, 2008PubMedCrossRef Leschka S, Scheffel H, Husmann L, et al: Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR 190:1583–1590, 2008PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC: Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97:173–174, 2006PubMedCrossRef Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC: Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97:173–174, 2006PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al: Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154, 2005PubMedCrossRef Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al: Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154, 2005PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA: Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557, 2005PubMedCrossRef Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA: Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557, 2005PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Leshka S, Husmann L, Desbiolles LM, et al: Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol 16:1964–1972, 2006CrossRef Leshka S, Husmann L, Desbiolles LM, et al: Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol 16:1964–1972, 2006CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Maurovich-Horvat P, et al: Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 57:373–379, 2006PubMedCrossRef Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Maurovich-Horvat P, et al: Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 57:373–379, 2006PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al: Improving diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients with mild heart rhythm irregularities using ECG editing. AJR 186:634–638, 2006PubMedCrossRef Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al: Improving diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients with mild heart rhythm irregularities using ECG editing. AJR 186:634–638, 2006PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al: Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086, 2002PubMedCrossRef Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al: Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086, 2002PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al: Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310, 2006PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al: Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310, 2006PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hsieh J, Londt J, Vass M, Li J, Tang X, Okerlund D: Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac X-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 33:4236–4248, 2006PubMedCrossRef Hsieh J, Londt J, Vass M, Li J, Tang X, Okerlund D: Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac X-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 33:4236–4248, 2006PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Horiguchi J, Kiguchi M, Fujioka C, et al: Radiation dose, image quality, stenoses measurement and CT densitometry using prospective electrocardiograph-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography—a phantom study. AJR 190:315–320, 2008PubMedCrossRef Horiguchi J, Kiguchi M, Fujioka C, et al: Radiation dose, image quality, stenoses measurement and CT densitometry using prospective electrocardiograph-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography—a phantom study. AJR 190:315–320, 2008PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al: Prospective electrocardiography-triggered versus retrospective electrocardiography-gated 64-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality, stenoses assessment and radiation dose. Radiology 248:424–430, 2008PubMedCrossRef Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al: Prospective electrocardiography-triggered versus retrospective electrocardiography-gated 64-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality, stenoses assessment and radiation dose. Radiology 248:424–430, 2008PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B: Multislice CT coronary angiography: effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of coronary arteries. Rofo 178:600–604, 2006PubMed Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B: Multislice CT coronary angiography: effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of coronary arteries. Rofo 178:600–604, 2006PubMed
20.
go back to reference Horiguchi J, Shen Y, Hirai N, et al: Timing on 16-slice scanner and implications for 64-slice cardiac CT: do you start scanning immediately after breath-hold? Acad Radiol 13:173–176, 2006PubMedCrossRef Horiguchi J, Shen Y, Hirai N, et al: Timing on 16-slice scanner and implications for 64-slice cardiac CT: do you start scanning immediately after breath-hold? Acad Radiol 13:173–176, 2006PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zhang J, Fletcher JG, Harmsen WS, et al: Analysis of heart rate and heart rate variation during cardiac CT examinations. Acad Radiol 15:40–48, 2008PubMedCrossRef Zhang J, Fletcher JG, Harmsen WS, et al: Analysis of heart rate and heart rate variation during cardiac CT examinations. Acad Radiol 15:40–48, 2008PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Paul JF, Abada HT: Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol 17:2028–2037, 2007PubMedCrossRef Paul JF, Abada HT: Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol 17:2028–2037, 2007PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Stillman AE, Oudkerk M, Ackerman M, et al: Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology. Eur Radiol 17:2196–2207, 2007PubMedCrossRef Stillman AE, Oudkerk M, Ackerman M, et al: Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology. Eur Radiol 17:2196–2207, 2007PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Liu X, Zhao X, Huang J, et al: Comparison of 3D free-breathing coronary MR angiography and 64-MDCT angiography for detection of coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium scores. AJR 189:1326–1332, 2007PubMedCrossRef Liu X, Zhao X, Huang J, et al: Comparison of 3D free-breathing coronary MR angiography and 64-MDCT angiography for detection of coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium scores. AJR 189:1326–1332, 2007PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is It Possible to Predict Heart Rate and Range during Enhanced Cardiac CT Scan from Previous Non-enhanced Cardiac CT?
Authors
Jun Horiguchi
Hideya Yamamoto
Ryuichi Arie
Masao Kiguchi
Chikako Fujioka
Megu Ohtaki
Yasuki Kihara
Kazuo Awai
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9333-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2011 Go to the issue