Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Intravascular Ultrasound | Research

Predictive value of intravascular ultrasound for the function of intermediate coronary lesions

Authors: Yajuan Zhu, Guowei Zhou, Lei Yang, Keng Liu, Yuning Xie, Wen-Yi Yang, Qiuyan Dai

Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can provide detailed coronary anatomic parameters. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the parameters measured by IVUS for the prediction of intermediate coronary lesions function by referencing quantitative fraction ratio (QFR) ≤ 0.80 (vs. > 0.80).

Methods

Eighty four cases with 92 intermediate coronary lesions in vessels with a diameter ≥ 2.50 mm were enrolled. Paired assessment of IVUS and cQFR was available, and vessels with cQFR ≤ 0.8 were considered the positive reference standard. Logistic regression was used to select model variables by a maximum partial likelihood estimation test and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of different indices.

Results

Plaque burden (PB) and lesion length (LL) of IVUS were independent risk factors for the function of coronary lesions. The predictive probability P was derived from the combined PB and LL model. The area under the curve (AUC) of PB, (minimum lumen area) MLA, and LL and the predicted probability P are 0.789,0.732,0731, and 0.863, respectively (P < 0.01). The AUC of the predicted probability P was the biggest among them; the prediction accuracy of cQFR ≤ 0.8 was 84.8%, and the sensitivity of the diagnostic model was 0.826, specificity was 0. 725, and P < 0.01.

Conclusion

PB and LL of IVUS were independent risk factors influencing the function of intermediate coronary lesions. The model combining the PB and LL may predict coronary artery function better than any other single parameter.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Armstrong PW. A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(13):1530–8.CrossRefPubMed Armstrong PW. A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(13):1530–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(8):839–48.CrossRefPubMed Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(8):839–48.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):991–1001.CrossRefPubMed De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):991–1001.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–24.CrossRefPubMed Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–24.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Johnson NP, Toth GG, Lai D, Zhu H, Acar G, Agostoni P, et al. Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(16):1641–54.CrossRefPubMed Johnson NP, Toth GG, Lai D, Zhu H, Acar G, Agostoni P, et al. Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(16):1641–54.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gotberg M, Cook CM, Sen S, Nijjer S, Escaned J, Davies JE. The evolving future of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(11):1379–402.CrossRefPubMed Gotberg M, Cook CM, Sen S, Nijjer S, Escaned J, Davies JE. The evolving future of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(11):1379–402.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the international multicenter FAVOR pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):2024–35.CrossRefPubMed Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the international multicenter FAVOR pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):2024–35.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(25):3077–87.CrossRefPubMed Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(25):3077–87.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, et al. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2021;398:2148.CrossRef Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, et al. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2021;398:2148.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hwang D, Choi KH, Lee JM, Mejia-Renteria H, Kim J, Park J, et al. Diagnostic agreement of quantitative flow ratio with fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(8): e011605.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hwang D, Choi KH, Lee JM, Mejia-Renteria H, Kim J, Park J, et al. Diagnostic agreement of quantitative flow ratio with fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(8): e011605.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, Nissen L, Vestergaard MB, Andersen BK, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery stenosis by quantitative flow ratio during invasive coronary angiography: the WIFI II study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(3): e007107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, Nissen L, Vestergaard MB, Andersen BK, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery stenosis by quantitative flow ratio during invasive coronary angiography: the WIFI II study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(3): e007107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Tanigaki T, Emori H, Kawase Y, Kubo T, Omori H, Shiono Y, et al. QFR Versus FFR derived from computed tomography for functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(20):2050–9.CrossRefPubMed Tanigaki T, Emori H, Kawase Y, Kubo T, Omori H, Shiono Y, et al. QFR Versus FFR derived from computed tomography for functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(20):2050–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, Matsuo H, Koltowski L, Eftekhari A, et al. Diagnostic performance of in-procedure angiography-derived quantitative flow reserve compared to pressure-derived fractional flow reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(14):e009603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, Matsuo H, Koltowski L, Eftekhari A, et al. Diagnostic performance of in-procedure angiography-derived quantitative flow reserve compared to pressure-derived fractional flow reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(14):e009603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Smit JM, Koning G, van Rosendael AR, El Mahdiui M, Mertens BJ, Schalij MJ, et al. Referral of patients for fractional flow reserve using quantitative flow ratio. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20(11):1231–8.CrossRefPubMed Smit JM, Koning G, van Rosendael AR, El Mahdiui M, Mertens BJ, Schalij MJ, et al. Referral of patients for fractional flow reserve using quantitative flow ratio. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20(11):1231–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zuo W, Yang M, Chen Y, Xie A, Chen L, Ma G. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio versus quantitative flow ratio for detecting the functional significance of coronary stenosis. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:5828931.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zuo W, Yang M, Chen Y, Xie A, Chen L, Ma G. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio versus quantitative flow ratio for detecting the functional significance of coronary stenosis. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:5828931.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Kleczynski P, Dziewierz A, Rzeszutko L, Dudek D, Legutko J. Borderline coronary lesion assessment with quantitative flow ratio and its relation to the instantaneous wave-free ratio. Adv Med Sci. 2021;66(1):1–5.CrossRefPubMed Kleczynski P, Dziewierz A, Rzeszutko L, Dudek D, Legutko J. Borderline coronary lesion assessment with quantitative flow ratio and its relation to the instantaneous wave-free ratio. Adv Med Sci. 2021;66(1):1–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Escaned J, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Shabbir A, Collet C, Lee JM, et al. Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2023;19:464.CrossRefPubMed Escaned J, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Shabbir A, Collet C, Lee JM, et al. Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2023;19:464.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):226–35.CrossRefPubMed Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):226–35.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ben-Dor I, Torguson R, Deksissa T, Bui AB, Xue Z, Satler LF, et al. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012;13(3):177–82.CrossRefPubMed Ben-Dor I, Torguson R, Deksissa T, Bui AB, Xue Z, Satler LF, et al. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012;13(3):177–82.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nascimento BR, de Sousa MR, Koo BK, Samady H, Bezerra HG, Ribeiro AL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area compared with fractional flow reserve–meta-analysis: pooled accuracy of IVUS luminal area versus FFR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(3):377–85.CrossRefPubMed Nascimento BR, de Sousa MR, Koo BK, Samady H, Bezerra HG, Ribeiro AL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area compared with fractional flow reserve–meta-analysis: pooled accuracy of IVUS luminal area versus FFR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(3):377–85.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lopes JP, Jordan MK, Bezerra H, Costa MA, Attizzani G. Diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area compared with fractional flow reserve. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2017;65(3):321–30.PubMed Lopes JP, Jordan MK, Bezerra H, Costa MA, Attizzani G. Diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area compared with fractional flow reserve. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2017;65(3):321–30.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Cui M, Zhu D, Guo LJ, Song LY, Zhang YZ, Zhang FC, et al. Usefulness of lumen area parameters determined by intravascular ultrasound to predict functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(9):1606–11.PubMed Cui M, Zhu D, Guo LJ, Song LY, Zhang YZ, Zhang FC, et al. Usefulness of lumen area parameters determined by intravascular ultrasound to predict functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(9):1606–11.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Chen SL, Xu B, Chen JB, Xu T, Ye F, Zhang JJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters predicting the functional significance of single de novo lesions. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1364–9.CrossRefPubMed Chen SL, Xu B, Chen JB, Xu T, Ye F, Zhang JJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters predicting the functional significance of single de novo lesions. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1364–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Brown AJ, Giblett JP, Bennett MR, West NEJ, Hoole SP. Anatomical plaque and vessel characteristics are associated with hemodynamic indices including fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A prospective exploratory intravascular ultrasound analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017;248:92–6.CrossRefPubMed Brown AJ, Giblett JP, Bennett MR, West NEJ, Hoole SP. Anatomical plaque and vessel characteristics are associated with hemodynamic indices including fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A prospective exploratory intravascular ultrasound analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017;248:92–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predictive value of intravascular ultrasound for the function of intermediate coronary lesions
Authors
Yajuan Zhu
Guowei Zhou
Lei Yang
Keng Liu
Yuning Xie
Wen-Yi Yang
Qiuyan Dai
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2261
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03489-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 1/2023 Go to the issue