Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 1/2024

23-05-2023 | Original Article

Intraoperative Risk of Aerial Contamination of Breast Prosthesis During Augmentation Mammoplasty

Authors: J. Cámara-Pérez, M. A. Rodríguez-Cano, J. C. Zapata-Negreiros

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

The augmentation mammoplasty with prosthesis implantation is the most frequent aesthetic surgical intervention. One of the most frequent complications associated to this surgery is the bacteriological contamination of the implants. In order to avoid it, different protocols like the 14-points have been proposed. One of the measures included is the avoidance of the aerial exposure of the prosthesis before implantation. However, the risk of contamination without direct contact has not been well-established. Our aim has been to evaluate the risk of aerial contamination breast prostheses during the surgical procedure. During the course of the surgery of augmentation mammoplasty with prosthesis implantation, we rubbed a hyssop over the prosthesis before the full unwrapping; these samples were used as the control group. Afterwards, the prostheses were irrigated with either saline serum or povidone-iodine and exposed to air in the operating room. New samples were taken with a hyssop after 2 and 5 min. All these samples were cultured in the microbiology lab. In total, 36 prostheses, microtexturized and smooth ones, were analyzed. All microbiological cultures were negative at 0′, 2′, and 5′, regardless of the implant texture and the irrigation fluid used. There is no microbial contamination of the breast implants during the course of the surgical intervention preimplantation due to aerial exposure, and there might be therefore other different sources of prosthesis contamination.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mempin M, Hu H, Chowdhury D, Deva A, Vickery K, The A (2018) B and C’s of silicone breast implants: anaplastic large cell lymphoma, biofilm and capsular contracture. Materials (Basel) 11(12):2393CrossRefPubMed Mempin M, Hu H, Chowdhury D, Deva A, Vickery K, The A (2018) B and C’s of silicone breast implants: anaplastic large cell lymphoma, biofilm and capsular contracture. Materials (Basel) 11(12):2393CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Adams WP Jr, Culbertson EJ, Deva AK, Magnusson MR, Layt C, Jewell ML, Mallucci P, Hedén P (2017) Macrotextured breast implants with defined steps to minimize bacterial contamination around the device: experience in 42,000 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(3):427–31CrossRefPubMed Adams WP Jr, Culbertson EJ, Deva AK, Magnusson MR, Layt C, Jewell ML, Mallucci P, Hedén P (2017) Macrotextured breast implants with defined steps to minimize bacterial contamination around the device: experience in 42,000 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(3):427–31CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pajuelo A (2004) Bloque Quirúrgico: Proceso de Soporte. Consejería de Salud, Sevilla, pp 110–27 Pajuelo A (2004) Bloque Quirúrgico: Proceso de Soporte. Consejería de Salud, Sevilla, pp 110–27
5.
go back to reference Reischies FMJ, Krause R, Holzer J, Tiefenbacher F, Winter R, Eylert G, Meikl T, Tuca A, Köfer MJ, Kamolz LP, Lumenta DB (2017) What can we learn from sonication results of breast implants? PLoS One 12(8):e0182267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reischies FMJ, Krause R, Holzer J, Tiefenbacher F, Winter R, Eylert G, Meikl T, Tuca A, Köfer MJ, Kamolz LP, Lumenta DB (2017) What can we learn from sonication results of breast implants? PLoS One 12(8):e0182267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Zambacos GJ, Nguyen D, Morris RJ (2004) Effect of povidone iodine on silicone gel breast implants in vitro: implications for clinical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(3):706–710CrossRefPubMed Zambacos GJ, Nguyen D, Morris RJ (2004) Effect of povidone iodine on silicone gel breast implants in vitro: implications for clinical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(3):706–710CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Khoo LS, Stevens HP (2017) Preventing electrostatic contamination of breast implants: an effective and simple intraoperative method. Aesthet Surg J 37(6):731–733PubMed Khoo LS, Stevens HP (2017) Preventing electrostatic contamination of breast implants: an effective and simple intraoperative method. Aesthet Surg J 37(6):731–733PubMed
8.
go back to reference Peña CG (2007) Influencia de las cargas triboeléctricas y de la contaminación sintomática de los implantes. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam 33(4):209–213 Peña CG (2007) Influencia de las cargas triboeléctricas y de la contaminación sintomática de los implantes. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam 33(4):209–213
9.
go back to reference Ngaage LM, Elegbede A, Brao K, Chopra K, Gowda AU, Nam AJ, Ernst RK, Shirtliff ME, Harro J, Rasko YM (2020) The efficacy of breast implant irrigant solutions: a comparative analysis using an in vitro model. Plast Reconstr Surg 146(2):301–308CrossRefPubMed Ngaage LM, Elegbede A, Brao K, Chopra K, Gowda AU, Nam AJ, Ernst RK, Shirtliff ME, Harro J, Rasko YM (2020) The efficacy of breast implant irrigant solutions: a comparative analysis using an in vitro model. Plast Reconstr Surg 146(2):301–308CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Intraoperative Risk of Aerial Contamination of Breast Prosthesis During Augmentation Mammoplasty
Authors
J. Cámara-Pérez
M. A. Rodríguez-Cano
J. C. Zapata-Negreiros
Publication date
23-05-2023
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03809-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Indian Journal of Surgery 1/2024 Go to the issue