Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Diabetologica 8/2023

Open Access 09-05-2023 | Insulins | Original Article

Associations between clinical and psychosocial factors and HbA1c in adult insulin pump users with type 1 diabetes

Authors: Signe Schmidt, Kristoffer Panduro Madsen, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Karen Rytter, Eva Hommel, Bryan Cleal, Ingrid Willaing, Henrik Ullits Andersen, Kirsten Nørgaard

Published in: Acta Diabetologica | Issue 8/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

Many adults with type 1 diabetes do not achieve recommended glycemic goals despite intensive insulin therapy using insulin pumps. The aim of this study was to explore associations between clinical and psychosocial factors and HbA1c in insulin pump users to identify and prioritize areas for potential intervention.

Methods

A questionnaire-based survey covering clinical and psychosocial aspects of life with type 1 diabetes was distributed to all adult (≥ 18 years) insulin pump users in the Capital Region of Denmark. Responses were combined with data from medical records and national registries. Associations with HbA1c were modeled using regression-based machine learning.

Results

Of 1,591 invited individuals, 770 (48.4%) responded to the survey. Mean HbA1c among responders was 7.3% (56 mmol/mmol), and 35.6% had an HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol). Six factors were significantly associated with HbA1c: diabetes duration (0.006% (0.1 mmol/mol) lower HbA1c per 1-year increase in diabetes duration); education (0.4% (4.3 mmol/mol) lower HbA1c with long higher education vs. primary school); insulin type (0.2% (2.2 mmol/mol) lower HbA1c with ultra-rapid-acting insulin vs. rapid-acting insulin); hypoglycemia awareness status (0.2% (2.2 mmol/mol) lower HbA1c with complete unawareness vs. full awareness); insulin device satisfaction (0.2% (2.7 mmol/mol) lower HbA1c per 1-point increase in Insulin Device Satisfaction Survey score); and diabetes distress (0.3% (3.1 mmol/mol) higher HbA1c per 1-point increase in Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale score).

Conclusions

This study identified several associations between clinical and psychosocial factors and HbA1c that may be considered when developing interventions targeted people with type 1 diabetes.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Holt RIG, Devries JH, Hess-Fischl A et al (2021) The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. a consensus report by the American diabetes association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabet Care 44:2589–2625. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci21-0043CrossRef Holt RIG, Devries JH, Hess-Fischl A et al (2021) The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. a consensus report by the American diabetes association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabet Care 44:2589–2625. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2337/​dci21-0043CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Karges B, Schwandt A, Heidtmann B et al (2017) Association of insulin pump therapy vs insulin injection therapy with severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, and glycemic control among children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes. J Am Med Assoc 318:1358–1366. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.13994CrossRef Karges B, Schwandt A, Heidtmann B et al (2017) Association of insulin pump therapy vs insulin injection therapy with severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, and glycemic control among children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes. J Am Med Assoc 318:1358–1366. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2017.​13994CrossRef
8.
go back to reference van den Boom L, Karges B, Auzanneau M et al (2019) Temporal trends and contemporary use of insulin pump therapy and glucose monitoring among children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes between 1995 and 2017. Diabet Care 42:dc190345. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-0345CrossRef van den Boom L, Karges B, Auzanneau M et al (2019) Temporal trends and contemporary use of insulin pump therapy and glucose monitoring among children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes between 1995 and 2017. Diabet Care 42:dc190345. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2337/​dc19-0345CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Collyns OJ, Meier RA, Betts ZL et al (2021) Improved glycemic outcomes with medtronic minimed advanced hybrid closed-loop delivery: Results from a randomized crossover trial comparing automated insulin delivery with predictive low glucose suspend in peoplewithtype1diabetes. Diabet Care 44:969–975. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2250CrossRef Collyns OJ, Meier RA, Betts ZL et al (2021) Improved glycemic outcomes with medtronic minimed advanced hybrid closed-loop delivery: Results from a randomized crossover trial comparing automated insulin delivery with predictive low glucose suspend in peoplewithtype1diabetes. Diabet Care 44:969–975. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2337/​dc20-2250CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT)/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications (EDIC) study research group (2016) Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetes: the DCCT/EDIC study 30-year follow-up. Diabet Care 39:686–693. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-1990CrossRef Diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT)/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications (EDIC) study research group (2016) Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetes: the DCCT/EDIC study 30-year follow-up. Diabet Care 39:686–693. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2337/​dc15-1990CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (1995) Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M (eds) Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-NELSON, Windsor, UK, pp 35–37 Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (1995) Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M (eds) Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-NELSON, Windsor, UK, pp 35–37
35.
37.
go back to reference Klonoff DC, Evans ML, Lane W et al (2019) A randomized, multicentre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in adults with type 1 diabetes (onset 5). Diabet, Obes Metab 21:961–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13610CrossRef Klonoff DC, Evans ML, Lane W et al (2019) A randomized, multicentre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in adults with type 1 diabetes (onset 5). Diabet, Obes Metab 21:961–967. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​dom.​13610CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Boughton CK, Hartnell S, Thabit H et al (2021) Hybrid closed-loop glucose control with faster insulin aspart compared with standard insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, multicentre, multinational, randomized, crossover study. Diabet, Obes Metab 23:1389–1396. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14355CrossRef Boughton CK, Hartnell S, Thabit H et al (2021) Hybrid closed-loop glucose control with faster insulin aspart compared with standard insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, multicentre, multinational, randomized, crossover study. Diabet, Obes Metab 23:1389–1396. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​dom.​14355CrossRef
39.
41.
Metadata
Title
Associations between clinical and psychosocial factors and HbA1c in adult insulin pump users with type 1 diabetes
Authors
Signe Schmidt
Kristoffer Panduro Madsen
Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard
Karen Rytter
Eva Hommel
Bryan Cleal
Ingrid Willaing
Henrik Ullits Andersen
Kirsten Nørgaard
Publication date
09-05-2023
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Acta Diabetologica / Issue 8/2023
Print ISSN: 0940-5429
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02081-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2023

Acta Diabetologica 8/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine