Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Original Paper

Initial experience with a newly developed antirefluxive ureter stent

Authors: Manuel Ritter, Patrick Krombach, Thomas Knoll, Maurice Stephan Michel, Axel Haecker

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the functional efficacy of newly developed antirefluxive ureter stents (DJ), by performing immediate post-stenting cystograms on patients with acute ureteral obstruction requiring a DJ stent, and assessing stent-related symptoms by means of ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ). Patients with acute hydronephrosis requiring internal drainage were randomized to receive either an antirefluxive DJ or a conventional DJ (7 Fr., 26 cm, polyurethane, Urovision®, Germany). Mean stone size was 6.64 ± 3.33 and 6.5  ± 3.54 mm. Immediately after correct placement of the DJ, 200 ml of diluted contrast media was introduced into the bladder under fluoroscopic control to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Patients completed German versions of the USSQ on days 2 and 7 following stent placement, and 1 week after stent removal. The results were analyzed. 13 conventional and 16 antirefluxive stents were placed in 29 patients. Reflux was documented in eight conventionally stented patients (62.5%). Two of the 16 patients with antirefluxive stents (22%) presented reflux. 1 week after stent implantation, the mean pain value was 1.1 in the antirefluxive group and 3 in the standard group (p < 0.062). Flank pain during micturition occurred after 2 days in seven patients (58%) with standard stents and in three patients (33%) with antirefluxive stents (p < 0.23). 1 week after stent insertion, flank pain had dropped to 40% in the standard group and 11% in the antirefluxive group (p < 0.3). Our initial experience showed that the antirefluxive system might be effective in terms of reflux prevention and reduction of stent related symptoms especially during sexual intercourse.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL (1967) Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol 97(5):840–844PubMed Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL (1967) Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol 97(5):840–844PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chew BH, Knudsen BE, Nott L, Pautler SE, Razvi H, Amann J, Denstedt JD (2007) Pilot study of ureteral movement in stented patients: first step in understanding dynamic ureteral anatomy to improve stent comfort. J Endourol 21(9):1069–1075. doi:10.1089/end.2006.0252 PubMedCrossRef Chew BH, Knudsen BE, Nott L, Pautler SE, Razvi H, Amann J, Denstedt JD (2007) Pilot study of ureteral movement in stented patients: first step in understanding dynamic ureteral anatomy to improve stent comfort. J Endourol 21(9):1069–1075. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2006.​0252 PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ho CH, Chen SC, Chung SD, Lee YJ, Chen J, Yu HJ, Huang KH (2008) Determining the appropriate length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent by both stent configurations and related symptoms. J Endourol 22(7):1427–1431. doi:10.1089/end.2008.0037 PubMedCrossRef Ho CH, Chen SC, Chung SD, Lee YJ, Chen J, Yu HJ, Huang KH (2008) Determining the appropriate length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent by both stent configurations and related symptoms. J Endourol 22(7):1427–1431. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2008.​0037 PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ahmadzadeh M (1992) Flap valve ureteral stent with an antireflux function: a review of 46 cases. Urol Int 48(4):466–468PubMedCrossRef Ahmadzadeh M (1992) Flap valve ureteral stent with an antireflux function: a review of 46 cases. Urol Int 48(4):466–468PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ, Regan JD, Hood CG, Kavanagh PV (2002) Complications of ureteral stent placement. Radiographics 22(5):1005–1022PubMed Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ, Regan JD, Hood CG, Kavanagh PV (2002) Complications of ureteral stent placement. Radiographics 22(5):1005–1022PubMed
11.
go back to reference Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Gougousis E, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Varkarakis IM (2006) Is there a role for alpha1-blockers in treating double-J stent-related symptoms? Urology 67(1):35–39. doi:S0090-4295(05)01142-8 PubMedCrossRef Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Gougousis E, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Varkarakis IM (2006) Is there a role for alpha1-blockers in treating double-J stent-related symptoms? Urology 67(1):35–39. doi:S0090-4295(05)01142-8 PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Maan Z, Patel D, Moraitis K, El-Husseiny T, Papatsoris AG, Buchholz NP, Masood J (2010) Comparison of stent-related symptoms between conventional Double-J stents and a new-generation thermoexpandable segmental metallic stent: a validated-questionnaire-based study. J Endourol 24(4):589–593. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0318 PubMedCrossRef Maan Z, Patel D, Moraitis K, El-Husseiny T, Papatsoris AG, Buchholz NP, Masood J (2010) Comparison of stent-related symptoms between conventional Double-J stents and a new-generation thermoexpandable segmental metallic stent: a validated-questionnaire-based study. J Endourol 24(4):589–593. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2009.​0318 PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Brewer AV, Elbahnasy AM, Bercowsky E, Maxwell KL, Shalhav AL, Kahn SA, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1999) Mechanism of ureteral stent flow: a comparative in vivo study. J Endourol 13(4):269–271PubMedCrossRef Brewer AV, Elbahnasy AM, Bercowsky E, Maxwell KL, Shalhav AL, Kahn SA, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1999) Mechanism of ureteral stent flow: a comparative in vivo study. J Endourol 13(4):269–271PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Olweny EO, Landman J, Andreoni C, Collyer W, Kerbl K, Onciu M, Valimaa T, Clayman RV (2002) Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable ureteral stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model. J Urol 167(5):2198–2202. doi:S0022-5347(05)65128-2 PubMedCrossRef Olweny EO, Landman J, Andreoni C, Collyer W, Kerbl K, Onciu M, Valimaa T, Clayman RV (2002) Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable ureteral stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model. J Urol 167(5):2198–2202. doi:S0022-5347(05)65128-2 PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hubner WA, Plas EG, Stoller ML (1992) The double-J ureteral stent: in vivo and in vitro flow studies. J Urol 148(2 Pt 1):278–280PubMed Hubner WA, Plas EG, Stoller ML (1992) The double-J ureteral stent: in vivo and in vitro flow studies. J Urol 148(2 Pt 1):278–280PubMed
Metadata
Title
Initial experience with a newly developed antirefluxive ureter stent
Authors
Manuel Ritter
Patrick Krombach
Thomas Knoll
Maurice Stephan Michel
Axel Haecker
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0415-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Urolithiasis 4/2012 Go to the issue