Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Original Paper

Tissue effects of intracorporeal lithotripsy techniques during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotripters on rat bladder

Authors: Akif Diri, Berkan Resorlu, Muzeyyen Astarci, Ali Unsal, Cankon Germiyonoglu

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine the tissue effects of ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotripsy on the rat urothelium. The rats were divided into three groups. Groups I and II consisted of ten rats each that underwent intracorporeal lithotripsy (pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotripsy, respectively). Group III contained ten control rats and no lithotripsy method was used, they served as references for absence of injury. The light microscopy findings were evaluated as follows: squamous metaplasia, papillary projection, inflammation, increased stratification, and stone formation. In five (71.4%) animals of group II, bladders were edematous and hemorrhagic, macroscopically. Histologically, the bladder wall was normal in four rats of group I and in one of group II. There was a significant increase in inflammation (31.5%), squamous metaplasia (85.7%), papillary projection (71.4%), increased stratification (71.4%), and microscopic or macroscopic stone formation (85.7%) in the bladder wall of group II rats in comparison with group I and control group. In the rat model, we noted that ultrasonic devices have a potential risk for tissue injury. In turn, this was associated with a markedly increased deposition of CaOx stones in the kidney. When confronted with harder stones, pneumatic lithotripsy can be more effective while also minimizing tissue injury.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fernström I, Johannson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259 Fernström I, Johannson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259
2.
go back to reference Lowe G, Knudsen BE (2009) Ultrasonic, pneumatic and combination intracorporeal lithotripsy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23:1663–1668PubMedCrossRef Lowe G, Knudsen BE (2009) Ultrasonic, pneumatic and combination intracorporeal lithotripsy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23:1663–1668PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Liatsikos E, Dinlenc C, Fogarty J et al (2001) Efficiency and efficacy of different intracorporeal ultrasonic lithotripsy units on a synthetic stone model. J Endourol 15:925–928PubMedCrossRef Liatsikos E, Dinlenc C, Fogarty J et al (2001) Efficiency and efficacy of different intracorporeal ultrasonic lithotripsy units on a synthetic stone model. J Endourol 15:925–928PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Resorlu B, Kara C, Oguz U et al (2011) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex caliceal and staghorn stones in patients with solitary kidney. Urol Res 39:171–176PubMedCrossRef Resorlu B, Kara C, Oguz U et al (2011) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex caliceal and staghorn stones in patients with solitary kidney. Urol Res 39:171–176PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE et al (2005) Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173:1991–2000PubMedCrossRef Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE et al (2005) Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173:1991–2000PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Clayman RV, Hardeman SW et al (1985) Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy vs open surgery for renal calculi: a comparative study. JAMA 254:1054–1058PubMedCrossRef Preminger GM, Clayman RV, Hardeman SW et al (1985) Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy vs open surgery for renal calculi: a comparative study. JAMA 254:1054–1058PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Unsal A, Resorlu B, Kara C et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants, preschool age and older children with different sizes of instruments. Urology 76:247–253PubMedCrossRef Unsal A, Resorlu B, Kara C et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants, preschool age and older children with different sizes of instruments. Urology 76:247–253PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sofer M, Watterson JD, Wollin TA et al (2002) Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167:31–34PubMedCrossRef Sofer M, Watterson JD, Wollin TA et al (2002) Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167:31–34PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Teh CL, Zhong P, Preminger GM (1998) Laboratory and clinical assessment of pneumatically driven intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Endourol 12:163–169PubMedCrossRef Teh CL, Zhong P, Preminger GM (1998) Laboratory and clinical assessment of pneumatically driven intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Endourol 12:163–169PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Teichman J, Vassar G, Bishoff J (1998) Holmium:YAG lithotripsy yields smaller fragments than lithoclast, pulsed dye laser, or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Urol 159:17–23PubMedCrossRef Teichman J, Vassar G, Bishoff J (1998) Holmium:YAG lithotripsy yields smaller fragments than lithoclast, pulsed dye laser, or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Urol 159:17–23PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lehman DS, Hruby GW, Phillips C et al (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of a combined ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotrite with a standard ultrasonic. J Endourol 22:285–289PubMedCrossRef Lehman DS, Hruby GW, Phillips C et al (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of a combined ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotrite with a standard ultrasonic. J Endourol 22:285–289PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Begun FP (1994) Modes of intracorporeal lithotripsy: Ultrasound versus electrohydraulic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy. Semin Urol 12:39–50PubMed Begun FP (1994) Modes of intracorporeal lithotripsy: Ultrasound versus electrohydraulic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy. Semin Urol 12:39–50PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hoffman R, Olbert P, Weber J et al (2002) Clinical experience with a new ultrasonic and LithoClast combination for percutaneous litholapaxy. BJU Int 90:16–19CrossRef Hoffman R, Olbert P, Weber J et al (2002) Clinical experience with a new ultrasonic and LithoClast combination for percutaneous litholapaxy. BJU Int 90:16–19CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Haupt G, Sabrodina N, Orlovski M et al (2001) Rapid communication endoscopic lithotripsy with a new device combining ultrasound and lithoclast. J Endourol 15:929–935PubMedCrossRef Haupt G, Sabrodina N, Orlovski M et al (2001) Rapid communication endoscopic lithotripsy with a new device combining ultrasound and lithoclast. J Endourol 15:929–935PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Denstedt JD, Razvi HA, Rowe E et al (1995) Investigation of the tissue effect of a new device for intracorporeal lithotripsy the Swiss Lithoclast. J Urol 153:535–537PubMedCrossRef Denstedt JD, Razvi HA, Rowe E et al (1995) Investigation of the tissue effect of a new device for intracorporeal lithotripsy the Swiss Lithoclast. J Urol 153:535–537PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Piergiovanni M, Desgrandchamps F, Cochand-Priollet B et al (1994) Ureteral and bladder lesions after ballistic, ultrasonic, electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 8:293–299PubMedCrossRef Piergiovanni M, Desgrandchamps F, Cochand-Priollet B et al (1994) Ureteral and bladder lesions after ballistic, ultrasonic, electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 8:293–299PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Xue YQ, He DL, Chen XF et al (2009) Shock wave induced kidney injury promotes calcium oxalate deposition. J Urol 182:762–765PubMedCrossRef Xue YQ, He DL, Chen XF et al (2009) Shock wave induced kidney injury promotes calcium oxalate deposition. J Urol 182:762–765PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rabinovich YI, Esayanur M, Daosukho S et al (2006) Adhesion force between calcium oxalate monohydrate crystal and kidney epithelial cells and possible relevance for kidney stone formation. J Coll I Sci 300:131–140CrossRef Rabinovich YI, Esayanur M, Daosukho S et al (2006) Adhesion force between calcium oxalate monohydrate crystal and kidney epithelial cells and possible relevance for kidney stone formation. J Coll I Sci 300:131–140CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tsujihata M (2008) Mechanism of calcium oxalate renal stone formation and renal tubular cell injury. Int J Urol 15:115–120PubMedCrossRef Tsujihata M (2008) Mechanism of calcium oxalate renal stone formation and renal tubular cell injury. Int J Urol 15:115–120PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fuchs GJ (1988) Ultrasonic lithotripsy in the ureter. Urol Clin North Am 15:347–359PubMed Fuchs GJ (1988) Ultrasonic lithotripsy in the ureter. Urol Clin North Am 15:347–359PubMed
21.
go back to reference Marberger M (1983) Disintegration of renal and ureteral calculi with ultrasound. Urol Clin North Am 10:729–742PubMed Marberger M (1983) Disintegration of renal and ureteral calculi with ultrasound. Urol Clin North Am 10:729–742PubMed
Metadata
Title
Tissue effects of intracorporeal lithotripsy techniques during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotripters on rat bladder
Authors
Akif Diri
Berkan Resorlu
Muzeyyen Astarci
Ali Unsal
Cankon Germiyonoglu
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0439-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Urolithiasis 4/2012 Go to the issue