Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Original Paper

Fragmentation without extraction in ureteral stones: outcomes of 238 cases

Authors: Cemal Göktaş, Rahim Horuz, Oktay Akça, Ali Cihangir Çetinel, Selami Albayrak, Kemal Sarıca

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the success rates, auxiliary procedures and complications after ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) during which the fragments left in situ for spontaneous passage after complete disintegration into a acceptable (<4 mm) size. 238 patients with ureteral stones were treated with URS between 2005 and 2011, and disintegrated fragments (<4 mm) were left in situ for spontaneous passage. Patients were followed with radiography for 3 months and evaluated with respect to the success rates (stone-free), auxiliary procedures, complication rates and additional analgesic requirement. The median age was 42.2 ± 13.7 years, and overall stone size was 8.79 ± 2.94 mm. Significantly lower rate of stone-free status was achieved in proximal stones (p < 0.05). A second URS was necessary in 5% (n = 12) of the patients. Double-J catheter placement during initial URS did not cause any change in the rate of secondary URS (p = 0.620). Additional oral or intramuscular analgesia was required in 41% (n = 97) and 25% (n = 59) of the patients, respectively, after discharge. The overall stone-free rate was 95% and mean time to complete clearance was 5 days. Severe colic pain within 24 h was noted in 21 (9%), and transient hydro-ureteronephrosis in 31 (13%) patients, as minor complications. Leaving the fragments (<4 mm) in place for spontaneous passage following a successful disintegration in URS could be a reasonable approach with acceptable and comparable stone-free rates, and this approach appears to give chance of shortening the duration of operation and also avoiding from the potential morbidity of repeated manipulations during the both further disintegration and extraction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stoller ML, Bolton DM (2000) Urinary stone disease. In: Tanagho EA, McAninch JW (eds) Smith’s General Urology. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 291–320 Stoller ML, Bolton DM (2000) Urinary stone disease. In: Tanagho EA, McAninch JW (eds) Smith’s General Urology. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 291–320
2.
go back to reference Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJM, De La Rosette JJMCH et al (1998) Treatment of mid-and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness. Br J Urol 81:31–35PubMedCrossRef Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJM, De La Rosette JJMCH et al (1998) Treatment of mid-and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness. Br J Urol 81:31–35PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG et al (1997) Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 158:1915–1921PubMedCrossRef Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG et al (1997) Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 158:1915–1921PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Elsobky E, Sheir KZ, Madbouly K et al (2000) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: experience using two second-generation lithotripters. Br J Urol 86:851–856 Elsobky E, Sheir KZ, Madbouly K et al (2000) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: experience using two second-generation lithotripters. Br J Urol 86:851–856
5.
go back to reference Ghobish A (1998) In situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of middle and lower ureteral stones: a boosted, stentless, ventral technique. Eur Urol 34:93–98PubMedCrossRef Ghobish A (1998) In situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of middle and lower ureteral stones: a boosted, stentless, ventral technique. Eur Urol 34:93–98PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shiroyanagi Y, Yagisawa T, Nanri M et al (2002) Factors associated with failure of ESWL for ureteral stones using Dornier lithotriptor U/50. Int J Urol 9:304–307PubMedCrossRef Shiroyanagi Y, Yagisawa T, Nanri M et al (2002) Factors associated with failure of ESWL for ureteral stones using Dornier lithotriptor U/50. Int J Urol 9:304–307PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sayed MAB, Taher AM, Aboul-Ella HA et al (2001) Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management. BJU Int 88:675–678PubMedCrossRef Sayed MAB, Taher AM, Aboul-Ella HA et al (2001) Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management. BJU Int 88:675–678PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Willis LR, Evan AP, Connors BA et al (1999) Relationship between kidney size, renal injury and renal impairment induced by shock wave lithotripsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1753–1762PubMed Willis LR, Evan AP, Connors BA et al (1999) Relationship between kidney size, renal injury and renal impairment induced by shock wave lithotripsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1753–1762PubMed
9.
go back to reference Choong S, Whitfield H, Duffy P et al (2000) The management of paediatric urolithiasis. Br J Urol 86:857–860 Choong S, Whitfield H, Duffy P et al (2000) The management of paediatric urolithiasis. Br J Urol 86:857–860
10.
go back to reference Deliveliotis C, Stavropoulos NI, Koutsokalis A et al (1996) Distal ureteral calculi: ureteroscopy versus ESWL. A prospective analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 28:627–631PubMedCrossRef Deliveliotis C, Stavropoulos NI, Koutsokalis A et al (1996) Distal ureteral calculi: ureteroscopy versus ESWL. A prospective analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 28:627–631PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Küpeli B, Alkibay T, Sınık Z et al (2000) What is the optimal treatment for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm? Int J Urol 7:167–171PubMedCrossRef Küpeli B, Alkibay T, Sınık Z et al (2000) What is the optimal treatment for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm? Int J Urol 7:167–171PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Strohmaier WL, Schubert G, Rosenkranz T et al (1999) Comparison of ESWL and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study. Eur Urol 36:376–379PubMedCrossRef Strohmaier WL, Schubert G, Rosenkranz T et al (1999) Comparison of ESWL and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study. Eur Urol 36:376–379PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bagley DH (1988) Indications for ureteropyeloscopy. In:Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Lyon ES (ed) Ureteroscopy, Philadelphia, pp 17–30 Bagley DH (1988) Indications for ureteropyeloscopy. In:Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Lyon ES (ed) Ureteroscopy, Philadelphia, pp 17–30
14.
go back to reference Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, Hofmann R et al (1999) Ureteroscopy without routine balloon dilatation: an outcome assessment. J.Urol 147:1238–1241 Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, Hofmann R et al (1999) Ureteroscopy without routine balloon dilatation: an outcome assessment. J.Urol 147:1238–1241
15.
go back to reference Daniels GF Jr, Garnett JE, Carter MF (1988) Ureteroscopic results and complications experience with 130 cases. J Urol 139:710–712PubMed Daniels GF Jr, Garnett JE, Carter MF (1988) Ureteroscopic results and complications experience with 130 cases. J Urol 139:710–712PubMed
16.
go back to reference Netto NR, Claro JA, Esreves SC et al (1997) Ureteroscopic stone removal in the distal ureter. Why change? J Urol 157:2081–2083CrossRef Netto NR, Claro JA, Esreves SC et al (1997) Ureteroscopic stone removal in the distal ureter. Why change? J Urol 157:2081–2083CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fraser M, Joyce AD, Thomas DFM et al (1999) Minimally invasive treatment of urinary tract calculi in children. Br J Urol 84:339–342 Fraser M, Joyce AD, Thomas DFM et al (1999) Minimally invasive treatment of urinary tract calculi in children. Br J Urol 84:339–342
18.
go back to reference Tawfiek E, Bagley HD (1999) Management of upper urinary tract calculi with ureteroscopic techniques. Urology 53(1):25–31PubMedCrossRef Tawfiek E, Bagley HD (1999) Management of upper urinary tract calculi with ureteroscopic techniques. Urology 53(1):25–31PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Costello AJ, Westcott MJ, Peters JS (2000) Experience with the holmium laser as an endoscopic lithotrite. Aust NZJ Surg 70:348–350CrossRef Costello AJ, Westcott MJ, Peters JS (2000) Experience with the holmium laser as an endoscopic lithotrite. Aust NZJ Surg 70:348–350CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yamaguchi K, Minei S, Yamazaki T et al (1999) Characterization of ureteral lesions associated with impacted stones. Int J Urol 6:281–285PubMedCrossRef Yamaguchi K, Minei S, Yamazaki T et al (1999) Characterization of ureteral lesions associated with impacted stones. Int J Urol 6:281–285PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Harmon WJ, Sershon PD, Blute ML et al (1997) Ureteroscopy: current practice and long term complications. J Urol 157:28–32PubMedCrossRef Harmon WJ, Sershon PD, Blute ML et al (1997) Ureteroscopy: current practice and long term complications. J Urol 157:28–32PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Seitz C, Tanovic E, Kikic Z et al (2007) Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy. Eur Urol 52:1751–1757PubMedCrossRef Seitz C, Tanovic E, Kikic Z et al (2007) Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy. Eur Urol 52:1751–1757PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brito AH, Mitre AI, Srougi M (2006) Ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy of impacted ureteral calculi. Int Braz J Urol 32(3):295–299PubMedCrossRef Brito AH, Mitre AI, Srougi M (2006) Ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy of impacted ureteral calculi. Int Braz J Urol 32(3):295–299PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ et al (2001) Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol 166(2):538–540PubMedCrossRef Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ et al (2001) Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol 166(2):538–540PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) EAU/AUA: nephrolithiasis guideline panel. Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178:2418–2434PubMedCrossRef Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) EAU/AUA: nephrolithiasis guideline panel. Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178:2418–2434PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gettman MT, Segura JW (2005) Management of ureteric stones: issues and controversies. BJU Int 95(suppl 2):85–93PubMedCrossRef Gettman MT, Segura JW (2005) Management of ureteric stones: issues and controversies. BJU Int 95(suppl 2):85–93PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wolf JS Jr (2007) Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi. Urol Clin North Am 34(3):421–430PubMedCrossRef Wolf JS Jr (2007) Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi. Urol Clin North Am 34(3):421–430PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ciftci H, Savas M, Altunkol A et al (2010) Influence of stone size, location and impaction on the success of ureteroscopic pneumolithotripsy. Georgian Med News 183:7–12PubMed Ciftci H, Savas M, Altunkol A et al (2010) Influence of stone size, location and impaction on the success of ureteroscopic pneumolithotripsy. Georgian Med News 183:7–12PubMed
30.
go back to reference Fuganti PE, Pires S, Branco R et al (2008) Predictive factors for intraoperative complications in semirigid ureteroscopy: analysis of 1235 ballistic ureterolithotripsies. Urology 72((4):770–774 (Epub 2008 Jul 16)PubMedCrossRef Fuganti PE, Pires S, Branco R et al (2008) Predictive factors for intraoperative complications in semirigid ureteroscopy: analysis of 1235 ballistic ureterolithotripsies. Urology 72((4):770–774 (Epub 2008 Jul 16)PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Fragmentation without extraction in ureteral stones: outcomes of 238 cases
Authors
Cemal Göktaş
Rahim Horuz
Oktay Akça
Ali Cihangir Çetinel
Selami Albayrak
Kemal Sarıca
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0431-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Urolithiasis 4/2012 Go to the issue