Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2019

01-12-2019 | Infertility | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Frozen-thawed embryo transfer is better than fresh embryo transfer in GnRH antagonist cycle in women with 3–10 oocytes retrieved: a retrospective cohort study

Authors: Xitong Liu, Haiyan Bai, Wenhao Shi, Juanzi Shi

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcome of fresh embryo transfer with frozen-thawed embryo transfer in subsequent cycle of GnRH antagonist protocol.

Methods

Totally, 1430 women were enrolled from the cases of our Assisted Reproduction Center from January 2015 to January 2019 for this retrospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria of the subjects included women with ages under 40 years, 3–10 oocytes retrieved, good embryo quality according to gardener score, GnRH antagonist protocol, underwent first cycle of fresh embryo transfer or freeze-all strategy and transferred in subsequent cycle. However, the patients with endometriosis, PGD/PGS cycles, history of recurrent pregnancy loss and uterine pathology were excluded. 495 women of group I underwent fresh embryo transfer in first cycle and 935 patients of group II received frozen-thawed transfer in subsequent cycle. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the variables that could be independently associated with clinical pregnancy rate. Models were adjusted for covariates including patients’ age, fertilization type, infertility type, infertility duration, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of embryos transferred and type of embryo transferred.

Results

Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in frozen-thawed embryo transfer than in fresh embryo transfer (63.70% vs. 54.50%, p < 0.001). Miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate were comparable between two groups. Variables independently associated with clinical pregnancy rate were fresh/frozen embryo transfer, patients’ age and the number of embryos transferred. After adjusting for variables, the frozen embryo transfer [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59–0.95, p = 0.016] was a predictive factor of clinical pregnancy rate.

Conclusion

Frozen embryo transfer is better than fresh embryo transfer in GnRH antagonist cycle in women with 3–10 oocytes retrieved.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC (2011) Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril 96(2):344–348CrossRef Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC (2011) Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril 96(2):344–348CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC (2014) Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. Fertil Steril 102(1):3–9CrossRef Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC (2014) Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. Fertil Steril 102(1):3–9CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA (2014) Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update 20(6):808–821CrossRef Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA (2014) Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update 20(6):808–821CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pelkonen S, Koivunen R, Gissler M (2010) Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995–2006. Hum Reprod 25(4):914–923CrossRef Pelkonen S, Koivunen R, Gissler M (2010) Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995–2006. Hum Reprod 25(4):914–923CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Depalo R, Jayakrishan K, Garruti G (2012) GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 10(4):26CrossRef Depalo R, Jayakrishan K, Garruti G (2012) GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 10(4):26CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F (2015) Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 103(5):1190–1193CrossRef Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F (2015) Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 103(5):1190–1193CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aflatoonian AM-TM, Mojtahedi MF (2018) Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer after gonadotropinreleasing hormone agonist trigger in gonadotropinreleasing hormone antagonist cycles among high responder women: a randomized, multi-center study. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) 16(1):9–18CrossRef Aflatoonian AM-TM, Mojtahedi MF (2018) Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer after gonadotropinreleasing hormone agonist trigger in gonadotropinreleasing hormone antagonist cycles among high responder women: a randomized, multi-center study. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) 16(1):9–18CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kol S, Lightman A, Hillensjo T (1999) High doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in in-vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect the outcome of subsequent freeze-thaw cycles. Hum Reprod 14(9):2242–2244CrossRef Kol S, Lightman A, Hillensjo T (1999) High doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in in-vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect the outcome of subsequent freeze-thaw cycles. Hum Reprod 14(9):2242–2244CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zikopoulos K, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M (2004) Duration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration does not affect the outcome of subsequent frozen-thawed cycles. Fertil Steril 81(2):473–475CrossRef Zikopoulos K, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M (2004) Duration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration does not affect the outcome of subsequent frozen-thawed cycles. Fertil Steril 81(2):473–475CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Garcia JE, Acosta AA, Hsiu JG (1984) Advanced endometrial maturation after ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 41(1):31–35CrossRef Garcia JE, Acosta AA, Hsiu JG (1984) Advanced endometrial maturation after ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 41(1):31–35CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kolb BA, Paulson RJ (1997) The luteal phase of cycles utilizing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and the possible impact of this hyperstimulation on embryo implantation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176(6):1262–1267CrossRef Kolb BA, Paulson RJ (1997) The luteal phase of cycles utilizing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and the possible impact of this hyperstimulation on embryo implantation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176(6):1262–1267CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mirkin S, Nikas G, Hsiu JG (2004) Gene expression profiles and structural/functional features of the peri-implantation endometrium in natural and gonadotropin-stimulated cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(11):5742–5752CrossRef Mirkin S, Nikas G, Hsiu JG (2004) Gene expression profiles and structural/functional features of the peri-implantation endometrium in natural and gonadotropin-stimulated cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(11):5742–5752CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ubaldi F, Bourgain C, Tournaye H (1997) Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase. Fertil Steril 67(3):521–526CrossRef Ubaldi F, Bourgain C, Tournaye H (1997) Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase. Fertil Steril 67(3):521–526CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nikas G, Develioglu OH, Toner JP (1999) Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 14(3):787–792CrossRef Nikas G, Develioglu OH, Toner JP (1999) Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 14(3):787–792CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kolibianakis E, Bourgain C, Albano C (2002) Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. Fertil Steril 78(5):1025–1029CrossRef Kolibianakis E, Bourgain C, Albano C (2002) Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. Fertil Steril 78(5):1025–1029CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A (2012) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 98(2):368–377CrossRef Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A (2012) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 98(2):368–377CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ishihara O, Araki R, Kuwahara A (2014) Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan. Fertil Steril 101(1):128–133CrossRef Ishihara O, Araki R, Kuwahara A (2014) Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan. Fertil Steril 101(1):128–133CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wennerholm UB, Henningsen AK, Romundstad LB (2013) Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod 28(9):2545–2553CrossRef Wennerholm UB, Henningsen AK, Romundstad LB (2013) Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod 28(9):2545–2553CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wennerholm UB, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Bergh C (2009) Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod 24(9):2158–2172CrossRef Wennerholm UB, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Bergh C (2009) Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod 24(9):2158–2172CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB (2013) Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 19(2):87–104CrossRef Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB (2013) Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 19(2):87–104CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Johnson KM, Hacker MR, Resetkova N (2019) Risk of ischemic placental disease in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 111(4):714–721CrossRef Johnson KM, Hacker MR, Resetkova N (2019) Risk of ischemic placental disease in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 111(4):714–721CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer is better than fresh embryo transfer in GnRH antagonist cycle in women with 3–10 oocytes retrieved: a retrospective cohort study
Authors
Xitong Liu
Haiyan Bai
Wenhao Shi
Juanzi Shi
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05373-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2019 Go to the issue